SA Footy

bertiebeatle wrote:

Brodlach wrote:

bertiebeatle wrote:Hearing Monfries is going to be in the final 22!

Couldn't be any happier today if my mail is correct

Interesting decision when only last week Hinkley said he needed a couple of weeks of solid footy in him before he came into the team. Magpies had a bye last week

Agree with the above. Thought the Maggies bye might rule him out for this week, but as the season has gone on, i have had a feeling his first game would be this weekend. Come in and do a job on Smith or Laird then have a block of 3 more weeks leading into finals. Could be wrong, just the way i have seen it.

hawks21 wrote:

bertiebeatle wrote:

Brodlach wrote:

bertiebeatle wrote:Hearing Monfries is going to be in the final 22!

Couldn't be any happier today if my mail is correct

Interesting decision when only last week Hinkley said he needed a couple of weeks of solid footy in him before he came into the team. Magpies had a bye last week

Agree with the above. Thought the Maggies bye might rule him out for this week, but as the season has gone on, i have had a feeling his first game would be this weekend. Come in and do a job on Smith or Laird then have a block of 3 more weeks leading into finals. Could be wrong, just the way i have seen it.

When's the last time he played AFL?

bertiebeatle wrote:

Brodlach wrote:

bertiebeatle wrote:Hearing Monfries is going to be in the final 22!

Couldn't be any happier today if my mail is correct

Interesting decision when only last week Hinkley said he needed a couple of weeks of solid footy in him before he came into the team. Magpies had a bye last week

Agree with the above. Thought the Maggies bye might rule him out for this week, but as the season has gone on, i have had a feeling his first game would be this weekend. Come in and do a job on Smith or Laird then have a block of 3 more weeks leading into finals. Could be wrong, just the way i have seen it.

Booney wrote:In - Monfries, Houston
Out - White (Omit ), Broadbent ( inj )

morell wrote:

Booney wrote:In - Monfries, Houston
Out - White (Omit ), Broadbent ( inj )

Only because its going to be wet, otherwise it's:

In - Monfries, Houston, Frampton
Out - White (Omit ), Broadbent ( inj ), Impey (Omit)

bertiebeatle wrote:

morell wrote:

Booney wrote:In - Monfries, Houston
Out - White (Omit ), Broadbent ( inj )

Only because its going to be wet, otherwise it's:

In - Monfries, Houston, Frampton
Out - White (Omit ), Broadbent ( inj ), Impey (Omit)

You need to accept that we wont have another tall come in!

Reckon Ah Chee will come in for White. Broadbent out for Houston & Monfries for Young

Booney wrote:In - Monfries, Houston
Out - White (Omit ), Broadbent ( inj )

Booney wrote:It's a lovely chart that tells me what I already knew, we beat up on the bottom sides and can't quite get close to the top sides. The top 4 sides consistent across the board, bar Adelaide who stand out head and shoulders above.

Pretty colours though.

morell wrote:

Booney wrote:It's a lovely chart that tells me what I already knew, we beat up on the bottom sides and can't quite get close to the top sides. The top 4 sides consistent across the board, bar Adelaide who stand out head and shoulders above.

Pretty colours though.

Its less about that and more about how much worse we are compared to the rest of the comp.

We're a middle of the road team that's been protected by a soft draw.

Spargo wrote:

morell wrote:

Booney wrote:It's a lovely chart that tells me what I already knew, we beat up on the bottom sides and can't quite get close to the top sides. The top 4 sides consistent across the board, bar Adelaide who stand out head and shoulders above.

Pretty colours though.

Its less about that and more about how much worse we are compared to the rest of the comp.

We're a middle of the road team that's been protected by a soft draw.

You've also had a fantastic run with injuries.

bennymacca wrote:It is interesting comparing Port with Melbourne, West Coast, Richmond, and even Collingwood, who, on that chart at least, seem to be doing a better job.

Post more charts like that Morell. As long as someone else makes them

bennymacca wrote:It is interesting comparing Port with Melbourne, West Coast, Richmond, and even Collingwood, who, on that chart at least, seem to be doing a better job.

Post more charts like that Morell. As long as someone else makes them

Booney wrote:

bennymacca wrote:It is interesting comparing Port with Melbourne, West Coast, Richmond, and even Collingwood, who, on that chart at least, seem to be doing a better job.

Post more charts like that Morell. As long as someone else makes them

**** me, a chart that means more than the ladder. Some shit gets spun I tell you...