Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:10 pmAny chance the Chinese will envoke the get out clause of their agreement?
Jim05 wrote:Pittard lol
Don't rubbish him, only one who can hold his head up.
Page 13 of 19
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:10 pmRe: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:11 pmDon't rubbish him, only one who can hold his head up.
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:11 pmCorona Man wrote:Any chance the Chinese will envoke the get out clause of their agreement?
I'd try it if I were them!
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:12 pmSack Bucks
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:12 pmBooney wrote:Jim05 wrote:Pittard lol
Don't rubbish him, only one who can hold his head up.
Agree, was laughing at that one bit of play where he coughed up a goal. Probably been his only mistake though
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:13 pmDees 6-2
Pies 1-2
Pies 1-2
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:13 pmQ. wrote:Sack Bucks
ANZAC Day cripple fight
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:14 pmNo need to drop Dixon. One week for stupidity there. ******* idiot.
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:14 pmDixon booked
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:17 pmWhat a clown Dixon!!! Minute to go in the game...
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:19 pmlooks like the puzzle needs a few more pieces
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:19 pmGeelong now paying $1.60.
I took the Cats in the first 1/4 at $1.95
I took the Cats in the first 1/4 at $1.95
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:22 pmcarey wrote:Geelong now paying $1.60.
I took the Cats in the first 1/4 at $1.95
Yeah but the Cats aren't that good, and don't travel well over here.
And that price will shorten up and then you can lay off and lock in a profit
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:25 pmwhufc wrote:Booney wrote:daysofourlives wrote:Yes we Ken
Time he took the blame, players are clearly not playing for him anymore. It happens when you show blind faith in the same guys every week and they dont feel the heat for their spots in the team and on the other side of the coin perhaps the guys in the reserves dont feel they get opportunities when they deserve it.
Has to take sole responsibility for recruiting Dixon, clearly doesnt fit in with the rest of the group or fits in too well and is a bad influence.
I'll cop criticism of Hinkley with no issues at all. This is deloprable.
What you know about Dixons career 4 games in is as much as the test of us, very little and you can't make that call.
You can tell alot about a blokes character when times are tough and Dixon is a spoilt brat!!
Only needed a couple of quarters to get a chance to bump this one
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:38 pmWonder how many media "experts" had Port, Richmond and Collingwood playing finals?
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:40 pmMaybe the AFL should have an 'contract amnesty week' that way the Power, Richmond, Collingwood and Fremantle can get rid of all their coaches!!!
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:43 pmJust got home from my sons footy trial games, anything happen in the footy today?
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:47 pmBrodlach wrote:Just got home from my sons footy trial games, anything happen in the footy today?
Not from a Port point of view. Nothing at all. That was the problem
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:47 pmBrodlach wrote:Just got home from my sons footy trial games, anything happen in the footy today?
Nothing worth discussing to be honest.
Port were worse than shit. It was an indictment on the playing group. Embarrassing. Disgusting. Unacceptable. We've dished up some shit over the years, no denying that, today was up with the worst of the worst.
Sums it all up.
Re: Round 4 discussion
Posted: Sun Apr 17, 2016 4:52 pmOnly took Buckley a quarter and a half to put our best midfielder in the midfield, meanwhile game already over.