SA Footy

smac wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

Chuck Wepner wrote:Sounds like common sense may prevail after all.Nigel "not so" smart it seems.

He's plenty smart. Facebook has gone off and everyone is talking about the game. He probably knew it wouldn't fly in the first place.

regards,

REB

Got lucky. Did you see the smug pricks face at the announcement? That's not someone who knows what they're doing.

Yeah fair call smaccer.

regards,

REB

Rik E Boy wrote:

smac wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

Chuck Wepner wrote:Sounds like common sense may prevail after all.Nigel "not so" smart it seems.

He's plenty smart. Facebook has gone off and everyone is talking about the game. He probably knew it wouldn't fly in the first place.

regards,

REB

Got lucky. Did you see the smug pricks face at the announcement? That's not someone who knows what they're doing.

Yeah fair call smaccer.

regards,

REB

Promoting a Power home game and copping a hiding from some of the states biggest football names.... I would say he wasn't acting too smartly

scoob wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:

smac wrote:

Rik E Boy wrote:He's plenty smart. Facebook has gone off and everyone is talking about the game. He probably knew it wouldn't fly in the first place.

regards,

REB

Got lucky. Did you see the smug pricks face at the announcement? That's not someone who knows what they're doing.

Yeah fair call smaccer.

regards,

REB

Promoting a Power home game and copping a hiding from some of the states biggest football names.... I would say he wasn't acting too smartly

Yeah, making 500k off the guersney's wouldnt have been a smart move either hey!

it was a disgrace they were going to sell them

woodublieve12 wrote:it was a disgrace they were going to sell them

Course it wasn't a disgrace. They have done it for every other commemorative jumper.

Only heard this third hand, but apparently kochie said on radio that we should be more pissed off at the SANFL for ticking this off than at the crows for coming up with the suggestion, and I tend to agree. Never should have been allowed in the first place.

bennymacca wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:it was a disgrace they were going to sell them

Course it wasn't a disgrace. They have done it for every other commemorative jumper.

Only heard this third hand, but apparently kochie said on radio that we should be more pissed off at the SANFL for ticking this off than at the crows for coming up with the suggestion, and I tend to agree. Never should have been allowed in the first place.

they were not state jumpers....
Even Roo said tjey shouldn't be selling them

If they had been cleared to wear it I have no problem with them selling it. The problem is that they shouldn't have been allowed to wear in the first place.

bennymacca wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:it was a disgrace they were going to sell them

Course it wasn't a disgrace. They have done it for every other commemorative jumper.

Only heard this third hand, but apparently kochie said on radio that we should be more pissed off at the SANFL for ticking this off than at the crows for coming up with the suggestion, and I tend to agree. Never should have been allowed in the first place.

Spot on Macca- the fact that the SANFL allowed it to happen is pretty average. Whicker's "no comments" gave me the sh*ts too- someone at the SANFL needs to be made accountable for a glaring administrative error.

valleys07 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:it was a disgrace they were going to sell them

Course it wasn't a disgrace. They have done it for every other commemorative jumper.

Only heard this third hand, but apparently kochie said on radio that we should be more pissed off at the SANFL for ticking this off than at the crows for coming up with the suggestion, and I tend to agree. Never should have been allowed in the first place.

Spot on Macca- the fact that the SANFL allowed it to happen is pretty average. Whicker's "no comments" gave me the sh*ts too- someone at the SANFL needs to be made accountable for a glaring administrative error.

Someone at the SANFL accountable..... A haha haha haha

A hahaha

valleys07 wrote:

bennymacca wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:it was a disgrace they were going to sell them

Course it wasn't a disgrace. They have done it for every other commemorative jumper.

Only heard this third hand, but apparently kochie said on radio that we should be more pissed off at the SANFL for ticking this off than at the crows for coming up with the suggestion, and I tend to agree. Never should have been allowed in the first place.

Spot on Macca- the fact that the SANFL allowed it to happen is pretty average. Whicker's "no comments" gave me the sh*ts too- someone at the SANFL needs to be made accountable for a glaring administrative error.

100% agree.

Squids wrote:

Love the design, hate the colours...

Someone at the SANFL accountable..... A haha haha haha

A hahaha

One of the best comments of the year.

Stephen Rowe looks more like a "KG Fool" with every passing day.

Lost his shed when Tippett moved to Sydney.

Caroline Wilson's Cellar must be looking good with all the bottles of Blackguts Shiraz she has won off Rowey

Think it's time for this idiot to pull his head in and send him back to South Fremantle where he can continue to be a loser with that loser club!!!

If they did wear it of course they should sell them. The AFL was selling Big V guernseys after the last rep game.

Crows shouldn't wear it but shit it looked good to see it again....

It was last worn in May.

The only teams who should be wearing the State jumper are

SANFL - & Age groups
SAAFL & Country
Super Rules

Andrew Capel wrote in today's fish wrap re Shaun McKernan - and I quote, "The player the Crows battled hard to retain at the end of last year when he sought a trade to a Victorian club".

Ummm, I was under the impression they shopped him around endlessly and in the end were resigned to the fact no one wanted him?

Spargo wrote:Andrew Capel wrote in today's fish wrap re Shaun McKernan - and I quote, "The player the Crows battled hard to retain at the end of last year when he sought a trade to a Victorian club".

Ummm, I was under the impression they shopped him around endlessly and in the end were resigned to the fact no one wanted him?

Glenelg were happy to offload him to the Ravens

Jim05 wrote:

Spargo wrote:Andrew Capel wrote in today's fish wrap re Shaun McKernan - and I quote, "The player the Crows battled hard to retain at the end of last year when he sought a trade to a Victorian club".

Ummm, I was under the impression they shopped him around endlessly and in the end were resigned to the fact no one wanted him?

Glenelg were happy to offload him to the Ravens

Not before gifting South a transfer fee for him.....

Spargo wrote:Andrew Capel wrote in today's fish wrap re Shaun McKernan - and I quote, "The player the Crows battled hard to retain at the end of last year when he sought a trade to a Victorian club".

Ummm, I was under the impression they shopped him around endlessly and in the end were resigned to the fact no one wanted him?

you were under the wrong impression