Page 114 of 155

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:35 pm
by Dutchy
Is Hinkley's contract up next year or 2018?

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 9:43 pm
by UK Fan

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:26 pm
by woodublieve12
Dutchy wrote:Is Hinkley's contract up next year or 2018?

Is he under the pump?

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:28 pm
by GWW
He would be, but has 2 more years on his contract so would be safe for the moment.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:53 pm
by MW
GWW wrote:He would be, but has 2 more years on his contract so would be safe for the moment.


Since when does a contract make you safe?

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 10:58 pm
by GWW
I cant see the club paying out 2 years of his contract.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:26 pm
by daysofourlives
Spargo wrote:
Fluffbag wrote:I would not pass judgement on Port until they have a preseason that is not affected by the Essendon stuff. Really hard to come up with the right structures when players are not available for preseason games or for the whole year. I never played the game but players talk about how important the preseason is, especially when bringing in key position players into the club.

Players not available?
Monfries wasn't getting a game regardless (and may not be re-signed?) so that leaves Ryder. A big out, no doubt.
But it's only 1 player. Yes, they've had injuries but this mob IMO is mentally weak. They just drift in & out of so many games.


They really are more Richmond than Richmond atm

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:29 pm
by woodublieve12
Anyone hear the lady cry on mmm this arvo talking about the club? Certainly can't knock her passion.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:00 am
by Booney
Wedgie wrote:I think Diss's server is struggling enough with this one! Some genuine queries though.
When it comes to respect only Ebert and perhaps an in form Boak achieve it from me.


And I bet they sleep better at night because of it.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 8:40 am
by Wedgie
Booney wrote:
Wedgie wrote:I think Diss's server is struggling enough with this one! Some genuine queries though.
When it comes to respect only Ebert and perhaps an in form Boak achieve it from me.


And I bet they sleep better at night because of it.

They probably would if another twenty guys at the club could earn some respect and they won some more games.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:05 am
by Lightning McQueen
Wedgie wrote:I think Diss's server is struggling enough with this one! Some genuine queries though.
When it comes to respect only Ebert and perhaps an in form Boak achieve it from me.

Ebert? Turn over king.

I rate Wines above him for effort and effectiveness.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:07 am
by Lightning McQueen
Wedgie wrote:They probably would if another twenty guys at the club could earn some respect and they won some more games.

If they had a more realistic game plan they'd probably be able to sustain the level required to win games for longer.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:09 am
by Booney
Lightning McQueen wrote:
Wedgie wrote:I think Diss's server is struggling enough with this one! Some genuine queries though.
When it comes to respect only Ebert and perhaps an in form Boak achieve it from me.

Ebert? Turn over king.

I rate Wines above him for effort and effectiveness.


Both play inside contested ball, it's where clangers are more likely to happen when under pressure.

On the run Eberts skills this year have been better than Wines have, easily.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:10 am
by Dutchy
woodublieve12 wrote:
Dutchy wrote:Is Hinkley's contract up next year or 2018?

Is he under the pump?


The media will eat him alive if it was next year, hence why I was wondering if that was on the agenda in 2017. Make next year huge for him, will be fascinating what he does from a list perspective, back in this group or complete clean out, has to be one or the other.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:12 am
by Lightning McQueen
Booney wrote:
Both play inside contested ball, it's where clangers are more likely to happen when under pressure.

On the run Eberts skills this year have been better than Wines have, easily.

You'd know more than I, I haven't been watching a great deal of footy lately.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:12 am
by Dogwatcher
Wonder why ;)

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:39 am
by Mythical Creature
Lightning McQueen wrote:
Booney wrote:
Both play inside contested ball, it's where clangers are more likely to happen when under pressure.

On the run Eberts skills this year have been better than Wines have, easily.

You'd know more than I, I haven't been watching a great deal of footy lately.


I wouldn't be watching much footy either in your position. Batting well McQueen. =D>

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:44 am
by Lightning McQueen
Mythical Creature wrote:
I wouldn't be watching much footy either in your position. Batting well McQueen. =D>


Ha, someone said to me the other day that they thought I was a bit out of my league, I said "Are you for real? We're not even in the same sport".

I'll gladly take the win and put up with having to look at her LOL.

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:50 am
by UK Fan
Bring her to the Reepham LM!!!!!

Re: Port Adelaide 2016

PostPosted: Tue Jul 26, 2016 10:54 am
by Lightning McQueen
UK Fan wrote:Bring her to the Reepham LM!!!!!

I'm sure she'll be picking my drunken arse out of there on the odd occasion.