Page 2 of 3

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:13 pm
by JK
Dogwatcher wrote:I sooooo want to ask about the drug use of posters. ;)


Chill bro and pass me the Cheezles man

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:13 pm
by nuggety goodness
Dogwatcher wrote:I sooooo want to ask about the drug use of posters. ;)

Caffeine - guilty....

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:45 pm
by Q.
Dogwatcher wrote:I sooooo want to ask about the drug use of posters. ;)


Nootropics ;)

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:45 pm
by Coach Bombay
MDMA caps - had them once but it was pretty fun night

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:47 pm
by Dogwatcher
And I only say that because it does provide a context for a person's stance on the topic.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 2:56 pm
by Booney
Dogwatcher wrote:And I only say that because it does provide a context for a person's stance on the topic.


How so?

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:27 pm
by Dogwatcher
I'm sure you can figure that out, you're a smart bloke.

For a Port supporter.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:37 pm
by Booney
I don't think your assumption is correct.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 4:41 pm
by MW
1st strike, anonymous, no penalty. Counselling internally.
2nd strike, name released, 2 game suspension.
3rd strike, goneski for good.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 5:08 pm
by Q.
Booney wrote:
Dogwatcher wrote:And I only say that because it does provide a context for a person's stance on the topic.


How so?


Confirmation biases.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 6:16 pm
by Dog_ger
three strikes is a joke.

afl you are sending out the wrong message.

Where can I do 3 things illegal in other countries and be forgiven... Hahaha

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 6:21 pm
by MJ_23
MW wrote:1st strike, anonymous, no penalty. Counselling internally.
2nd strike, name released, 2 game suspension.
3rd strike, goneski for good.


Pretty close, I reckon 2 weeks is a bit light. I would prefer 4-6, but pretty bang on IMO

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 6:22 pm
by CENTURION
hang on, if everyone knows the policy is no chances, then surely the culprit deserves to get the flick?

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:23 pm
by carey
So you can rob the bank once that's all good, You can even do it again we'll let that slide but you do it a 3rd time mister and your gone!

FFS give me a break. 3 strikes is a joke.

You get done for performace enhancing drugs no strikes at all, You get done F**k off your out.

Recreational drugs you get caught once- 10 weeks suspension and $20,000 get done a second time. F**k off your out.

These blokes live the greatest life's in the world. They love the fame but the fact is being a role model is par for the course in being AFL footballers, Like it or not. It's just the way it is.

In my line of work were randomly tested. So we toe the line as these guys need to.

'Ice' is a huge concern in the current climate we live in. I know I worry like hell about my lad and the group he can associate with I've just done my best to educated my lad and hope he makes the right life choices. I'm pretty confident he'll turn out fine but, You can't help but worry in this day and age.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:31 pm
by Q.
Footballers don't use ice. Impedes recovery and performance through sleep deprivation and appetite suppression. Most of them would be having a few toots of cocaine here and there.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 10:42 pm
by carey
Q. wrote:Footballers don't use ice. Impedes recovery and performance through sleep deprivation and appetite suppression. Most of them would be having a few toots of cocaine here and there.



Fair point Q. The ICE reference was probably more a point of me as a parent having concerns of this problem that's getting totally out of hand.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Wed Apr 08, 2015 11:20 pm
by Q.
The 'ice epidemic' is media sensationalism. Methamphetamine use in general hasn't actually increased.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:06 pm
by GWW
I'm no expert on the subject, but I noticed in this article, that the way that the drug is now being used, is causing problems.

http://www.news.com.au/technology/scien ... 7305408169

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 2:49 pm
by Q.
Exactly, the number of users hasn't increased, but habits of existing users has changed.

Re: AFL Illicit drugs policy

PostPosted: Thu Apr 16, 2015 3:57 pm
by JK
Q. wrote:Footballers don't use ice. Impedes recovery and performance through sleep deprivation and appetite suppression. Most of them would be having a few toots of cocaine here and there.


Out of season I wouldn't rule it out. There would be players racking up the Meth too I reckon.