I'm not involved enough to really comment whether indigenous players need more help or not, so I wont.
What I do find interesting is Kevin Sheedy's comments when the Rendell issue first came up, from memory it was something to the means of "we're gonna run them (anyone who has the same thoughts as that of Rendells) out of the game, we don't need them". Now that Rendell looks to be going to Collingwood I wonder if Kev will still be trying to run Matt out of the game.
It's also very interesting that during a meeting with Demitriou, Mifsud named 3 other officials that had the same opinion as that of Rendell, they or their club have never been named, no journo has ever even suggested who they are or their club. So my point is, if this issue is so important to the likes of Sheedy, Mifsud, Fahour, and Demitriou why hasn't this been taken further? How in fact do we know that Collingwood wasn't one of the clubs whose official had a similar opinion to that of Rendell? Going on from that, if Rendell has been through an "education" process concerning this and the other 3 haven't, how do we know that the problem isn't still apparent at these clubs and one of them might well be the club that employs Rendell which may then comprimise Matt Rendell?
JOKE, THE WHOLE THING IS A JOKE!!

'PAFC don't want any advantages in the SANFL. It would only take away from any achievements we earned.'
Keith Thomas ABC 891 Radio, 21/6/14.