Footy Smart wrote:Dutchy wrote:Yeah not sure, some players look good in shit teams, just cause they are above average. No doubt he was a fantastic player.
Thinking a bit more about Ben Hart, he was as good a 17-20 year old the game has seen IMO, the way he burst onto the scene and stood Lockett and Dunstall in their prime and ran off them to create was memorable. In a lot of ways he hit his prime early and faded in a bit in the later years which hurts peoples memory of him.
He still recieved AA honours in 1999 and then again in his 10/11th season in 2002 (finished in 2006 after injuries all year).
Its interesting to see how people perceive players and then when you see the stats.... think sh*t i was off. I did that with Richo ( I thought he played between 200-250 games and missed a shite load of set shots yet he played just under 300 games and kicked 800 goals

)
on that note, how do you rate fevola as a kick for goal? As good as they come?
Yeah thats what most people think. Richo had a better conversion rate then him!
His goal kicking woes are highly talked about because of those easy misses from 10metres out. I would pick him to kick for me any day. The blokes passion is amazing. love him!
Good to see Booney and REB stick up for the big fella. Not sure why he is not a great because he didnt play many finals. He dominated in a side that was shiat for years. his delivery was terrible his whole career. He still kicked 800 goals. Amazing effort. Definitely a great of the game.