Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Talk on the national game

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:49 pm

Will be plenty of suspensions this week. MRP report is normally on the AFL site by now.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Jim05 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:57 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Will be plenty of suspensions this week. MRP report is normally on the AFL site by now.

A couple of those tackles in the Geelong/Saints game were just as bad as Trengove's
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48342
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3840 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:59 pm

Ryan O'Keefe and Shane Mumford will get games as well. Michael Hurley?
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Jim05 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:17 pm

Buddy got 1
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48342
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3840 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby bloods08 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:24 pm

Go you Redbacks!
User avatar
bloods08
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4818
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: right here
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby whufc » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:26 pm

No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28745
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5957 times
Been liked: 2846 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:30 pm

Love the fact they called it reckless. Very very lucky. Even with 40% added he didn't get 2 games.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby bloods08 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:47 pm

Go you Redbacks!
User avatar
bloods08
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4818
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 1:06 pm
Location: right here
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 14 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Jim05 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:56 pm

Some of those decisions are a joke.
Jim05
Coach
 
 
Posts: 48342
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 9:03 pm
Has liked: 1130 times
Been liked: 3840 times
Grassroots Team: South Gawler

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Q. » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:02 pm

whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!


No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:23 pm

Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!


No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.


Also intentional and reckless Quichey. Joel Corey is lucky. Stokes unlucky.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby LMA » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:42 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!


No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.


Also intentional and reckless Quichey. Joel Corey is lucky. Stokes unlucky.


Also chuck in, Guerra couldn't finish the game and subsequently missed the following week where as Weller was unaffected
User avatar
LMA
Coach
 
 
Posts: 6237
Joined: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:37 pm
Has liked: 387 times
Been liked: 714 times
Grassroots Team: Port District

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby NO-MERCY » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:08 pm

whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!


Spot on mate, the AFL tribunal system is an absolute joke. :oops: :oops:
NO-MERCY
Coach
 
Posts: 5336
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:21 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 15 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:15 pm

NO-MERCY wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!


Spot on mate, the AFL tribunal system is an absolute joke. :oops: :oops:


I will call it The Judd Factor. Stokes gets 2 games for a love tap to the nuts, Franklin gets 1 week for an elbow to the head.
Cannabis is safer than alcohol
User avatar
The Sleeping Giant
Coach
 
Posts: 13693
Joined: Sat Apr 04, 2009 7:49 pm
Location: Not dying alone
Has liked: 69 times
Been liked: 193 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Johno6 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:24 pm

Are u dead set. Stokes got 2 weeks. Haha wtf.
I dunno if they see somethin diff to us with some of these
R.I.P Mum 28/02/12



Asterix Users - Squibs
User avatar
Johno6
Coach
 
Posts: 14684
Joined: Wed Mar 11, 2009 10:37 am
Has liked: 344 times
Been liked: 604 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Q. » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:40 pm

Comparing apples with apples, how Stokes gets done after Waite was cleared earlier in the year is horribly inconsistent.
User avatar
Q.
Coach
 
 
Posts: 22019
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 1:16 pm
Location: El Dorado
Has liked: 970 times
Been liked: 2397 times
Grassroots Team: Houghton Districts

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby whufc » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:42 pm

Johno6 wrote:Are u dead set. Stokes got 2 weeks. Haha wtf.
I dunno if they see somethin diff to us with some of these


Yeah mate $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

The AFL is nothing more than a multi million dollar business with an Australian Rules Comp on the side.
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28745
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5957 times
Been liked: 2846 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:00 pm

Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!


No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.


Steady on Q that doesn't fit in with hammers' conspiracy theory.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby whufc » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:01 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!


No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.


Steady on Q that doesn't fit in with hammers' conspiracy theory.

regards,

REB


Funny the bloke with the conspiracy theory was one of only a few who predicted this outcome ;)
RIP PH408 63notoutforever
User avatar
whufc
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28745
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 10:56 am
Location: Blakeview
Has liked: 5957 times
Been liked: 2846 times
Grassroots Team: BSR

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Postby Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:10 pm

whufc wrote:Funny the bloke with the conspiracy theory was one of only a few who predicted this outcome ;)



My conspiracy theory is better. The 'AFL doesn't want the Cats in the top four theory'

Draw - ******
MRP - ******
Free Kick Ratio (Despite Selwood's efforts) - ******

but - Stokesy shouldn't have done what he did...still....surprised Buddy didn't get more.

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28580
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1772 times
Been liked: 1886 times

PreviousNext

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Lightning McQueen and 7 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |