by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:49 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:57 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Will be plenty of suspensions this week. MRP report is normally on the AFL site by now.
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:59 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:17 pm
by bloods08 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:24 pm
by whufc » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:26 pm
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:30 pm
by bloods08 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:47 pm
by Jim05 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:56 pm
by Q. » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:02 pm
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:23 pm
Quichey wrote:whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.
by LMA » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:42 pm
The Sleeping Giant wrote:Quichey wrote:whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.
Also intentional and reckless Quichey. Joel Corey is lucky. Stokes unlucky.
by NO-MERCY » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:08 pm
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
by The Sleeping Giant » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:15 pm
NO-MERCY wrote:whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
Spot on mate, the AFL tribunal system is an absolute joke.![]()
by Johno6 » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:24 pm
by Q. » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:40 pm
by whufc » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:42 pm
Johno6 wrote:Are u dead set. Stokes got 2 weeks. Haha wtf.
I dunno if they see somethin diff to us with some of these
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:00 pm
Quichey wrote:whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.
by whufc » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:01 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Quichey wrote:whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!
No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.
Steady on Q that doesn't fit in with hammers' conspiracy theory.
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:10 pm
whufc wrote:Funny the bloke with the conspiracy theory was one of only a few who predicted this outcome
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |