SA Footy • View topic - Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

by **The Sleeping Giant** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:49 pm

Will be plenty of suspensions this week. MRP report is normally on the AFL site by now.

by **Jim05** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:57 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:Will be plenty of suspensions this week. MRP report is normally on the AFL site by now.

A couple of those tackles in the Geelong/Saints game were just as bad as Trengove's

by **The Sleeping Giant** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 5:59 pm

Ryan O'Keefe and Shane Mumford will get games as well. Michael Hurley?

by **Jim05** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:17 pm

Buddy got 1

by **bloods08** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:24 pm

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

by **whufc** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:26 pm

No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

by **The Sleeping Giant** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:30 pm

Love the fact they called it reckless. Very very lucky. Even with 40% added he didn't get 2 games.

by **bloods08** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:47 pm

All the MRP findings from this week

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

by **Jim05** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 6:56 pm

Some of those decisions are a joke.

by Q. » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:02 pm

whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.

by **The Sleeping Giant** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:23 pm

Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.

Also intentional and reckless Quichey. Joel Corey is lucky. Stokes unlucky.

by **LMA** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 7:42 pm

The Sleeping Giant wrote:
Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.

Also intentional and reckless Quichey. Joel Corey is lucky. Stokes unlucky.

Also chuck in, Guerra couldn't finish the game and subsequently missed the following week where as Weller was unaffected

by **NO-MERCY** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:08 pm

whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

Spot on mate, the AFL tribunal system is an absolute joke. :oops:

by **The Sleeping Giant** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:15 pm

NO-MERCY wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

Spot on mate, the AFL tribunal system is an absolute joke.

I will call it The Judd Factor. Stokes gets 2 games for a love tap to the nuts, Franklin gets 1 week for an elbow to the head.

by **Johno6** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:24 pm

Are u dead set. Stokes got 2 weeks. Haha wtf.
I dunno if they see somethin diff to us with some of these

by Q. » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:40 pm

Comparing apples with apples, how Stokes gets done after Waite was cleared earlier in the year is horribly inconsistent.

by **whufc** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:42 pm

Johno6 wrote:Are u dead set. Stokes got 2 weeks. Haha wtf.
I dunno if they see somethin diff to us with some of these

Yeah mate $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

The AFL is nothing more than a multi million dollar business with an Australian Rules Comp on the side.

by **Rik E Boy** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:00 pm

Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.

Steady on Q that doesn't fit in with hammers' conspiracy theory.

regards,

REB

by **whufc** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:01 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
Quichey wrote:
whufc wrote:No surprise at all difference between Franklin and Selwood MARKETABILITY!

No, the difference was in-play versus behind-play.

Steady on Q that doesn't fit in with hammers' conspiracy theory.

regards,

REB

Funny the bloke with the conspiracy theory was one of only a few who predicted this outcome

by **Rik E Boy** » Mon Jun 20, 2011 9:10 pm

whufc wrote:Funny the bloke with the conspiracy theory was one of only a few who predicted this outcome

My conspiracy theory is better. The 'AFL doesn't want the Cats in the top four theory'

Draw - ******
MRP - ******
Free Kick Ratio (Despite Selwood's efforts) - ******

but - Stokesy shouldn't have done what he did...still....surprised Buddy didn't get more.

regards,

REB

Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Re: Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Who is online

Around the place

Round 13 AFL tribunal discussion / Buddy Reported

Around the place

Join us