
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:34 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by JK » Thu Mar 22, 2012 2:55 pm
by Hefty » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:02 pm
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:40 pm
by Q. » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:44 pm
OnSong wrote:So it's ok for everyone to go "Yeah, give Jim a State funeral" but it's not ok for someone to go "Perhaps a State funeral is taking things a bit far"?
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:48 pm
Q. wrote:OnSong wrote:So it's ok for everyone to go "Yeah, give Jim a State funeral" but it's not ok for someone to go "Perhaps a State funeral is taking things a bit far"?
Tow the line buddy, it's socially unnacceptable to speak anything but good about the deceased.
by Q. » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:50 pm
OnSong wrote:Q. wrote:OnSong wrote:So it's ok for everyone to go "Yeah, give Jim a State funeral" but it's not ok for someone to go "Perhaps a State funeral is taking things a bit far"?
Tow the line buddy, it's socially unnacceptable to speak anything but good about the deceased.
He hasn't said anything bad about Jim.
by tigerpie » Thu Mar 22, 2012 3:58 pm
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:02 pm
tigerpie wrote:Jim Stynes deserves every bit of credit he can get, including a state funeral. Aker is a bell end of the highest order!
I feel for this idiots children who, as they grow up are going to have to have croc skin.
by Wedgie » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:16 pm
OnSong wrote:tigerpie wrote:Jim Stynes deserves every bit of credit he can get, including a state funeral. Aker is a bell end of the highest order!
I feel for this idiots children who, as they grow up are going to have to have croc skin.
He's a bell-end for questioning whether a State funeral was appropriate for a footballer who worked with kids with cancer, while others who do as much or more don't get that recognition?
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:19 pm
by Mr66 » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:23 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:24 pm
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:25 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:No state funeral for Aker then....
by Dogwatcher » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:26 pm
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:28 pm
Mr66 wrote:I wonder if Aker has attacked any of the state funerals given for useless, lazy and unknown politicians.
Jim did more good in an hour than any of these lying, thieving scum that get (taxpayer funded!)state funerals.
by Q. » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:31 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Aker, sometimes, just sometimes makes a bit of sense.
The problem is, he uses his outspoken thoughts for currency, to keep him in a career, not to make any difference in this world. Anything he ever says will be coloured by that.
While he may have had some good points in what he was trying to say, what did he think it would achieve?
Interestingly, while he's criticising a state funeral for a footballer, he forgets that he only gets the opportunity to drive opinion because he was a footballer himself.
If it wasn't for him being a highly decorated footballer, he'd be just another big mouth down the pub like the rest of us.
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:34 pm
by Dogwatcher » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:58 pm
by OnSong » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:59 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Which goes to my point, OS. Why make the comment in the first place?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |