by Brucetiki » Sun Mar 28, 2010 6:37 pm
by NFC » Sun Mar 28, 2010 7:08 pm
by Brucetiki » Sun Mar 28, 2010 8:13 pm
by Gingernuts » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:12 pm
by Voice » Sun Mar 28, 2010 10:37 pm
Brucetiki wrote:10:10 10:30 still going to be flippin late - glad I don't have an early start tomorrow or I'd be watching the second half in bed!
The game will finish at 10:10, the coverage goes on until 10:30
by Booney » Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:08 am
Gingernuts wrote:Can honestly say that this is the best I have ever seen Fremantle play.
To say the Crows played bad would take credit away from Freo, their pressure made Adelaide look like a rabble tonight.
Me thinks a few players were underdone out there too, Vince to name one.
Oh well, think you've just gotta right it off as one of those nights.
by whufc » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:00 am
by Gingernuts » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:00 am
Booney wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Can honestly say that this is the best I have ever seen Fremantle play.
To say the Crows played bad would take credit away from Freo, their pressure made Adelaide look like a rabble tonight.
Me thinks a few players were underdone out there too, Vince to name one.
Oh well, think you've just gotta right it off as one of those nights.
Interested in your thoughts on Edwards being named Adelaides best in the Monday 'Tiser mate?
by Footy Smart » Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:21 am
Gingernuts wrote:Booney wrote:Gingernuts wrote:Can honestly say that this is the best I have ever seen Fremantle play.
To say the Crows played bad would take credit away from Freo, their pressure made Adelaide look like a rabble tonight.
Me thinks a few players were underdone out there too, Vince to name one.
Oh well, think you've just gotta right it off as one of those nights.
Interested in your thoughts on Edwards being named Adelaides best in the Monday 'Tiser mate?
Serious?? Gees, barely sighted him.
My best would've been out of McLeod, Walker, Dangerfield. Was really impressed by Walker & Dangerfield actually, it seemed to me like they busted their chops all night.
Things to take out of the game:
- I know it's early to call, but Freo could be the big improver this year. They played unbelievable football last night. Pressure on the ball carier, clean possessions in close, and superb midfield work off Sandilands taps. Unstoppable they were.
- The Crows are underdone and will take a few rounds to get going. No doubt the coaching panel would expect to drop 2 or 3 games early on the back of putting the squad through a hard pre-season. If this means they peak in September rather that August, so be it.
- I felt the younger Crows still showed a lot last night despite the result. Walker impressed, as did Dangerfield's attempts to break the lines despite the game situation.
All in all it's no time for hysterics (see 'sack Craig' thread). A tough night at the office, but still plenty of footy to be played.
by Psyber » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:15 am
by hawks21 » Mon Mar 29, 2010 10:44 am
by JK » Mon Mar 29, 2010 11:00 am
hawks21 wrote:When Burton, Porps and Knights come back, I think the question could be asked about Henstels spot in the team? Found himself at half back for half the game!
by Chuck Wepner » Mon Mar 29, 2010 1:15 pm
Psyber wrote:The Crows have a bit of work to do.
Too many handballs, especially to players already covered by opponents.
Too many kicks straight to opposition players standing there on their own - a kick to a contest would be better than that.One ruckman??? It might have made sense if the one had been a Sandilands....
Both Fremantle and Port played a more direct style and both won.
[Though Port did their usual "take it easy and go defensive" once well in front, and nearly came unstuck as usual as a result.]
by Choccies » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:15 pm
by Brucetiki » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:18 pm
Voice wrote:Brucetiki wrote:10:10 10:30 still going to be flippin late - glad I don't have an early start tomorrow or I'd be watching the second half in bed!
The game will finish at 10:10, the coverage goes on until 10:30
Would you rather them play mid afternoon in 36 degree heat. Maybe it wasn't 36 there today but the AFL aren't to know that. It is very warm still in Perth this time of year.
by Gingernuts » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:20 pm
Choccies wrote:Top 10 things that annoyed me - Round 1, Crows v Freo
1. Refusing to bomb the ball long inside 50 where you have Tippett standing there, instead dicking around with the ball outside 50, apssing it thru 10 sets of hands and eventually turning it over.
2. Inablility to turn attack into defense after a turn over.
3. Crap handball skills
4. Richard Douglas' effort.
5. Backwards, retreating handballs, especially by the teams senior players
6. Umpiring. Didn't cost us the game at all but was still terrible
7. Missing shots at goal. Shouldn't really be any excuses at that level.
8. The way Freo waltzed the ball away from stoppages time and time again
9. Our apparent lack of ability to stem the flow when a bleed occurs.
10. We lost
by JK » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:21 pm
Gingernuts wrote:Choccies wrote:Top 10 things that annoyed me - Round 1, Crows v Freo
1. Refusing to bomb the ball long inside 50 where you have Tippett standing there, instead dicking around with the ball outside 50, apssing it thru 10 sets of hands and eventually turning it over.
2. Inablility to turn attack into defense after a turn over.
3. Crap handball skills
4. Richard Douglas' effort.
5. Backwards, retreating handballs, especially by the teams senior players
6. Umpiring. Didn't cost us the game at all but was still terrible
7. Missing shots at goal. Shouldn't really be any excuses at that level.
8. The way Freo waltzed the ball away from stoppages time and time again
9. Our apparent lack of ability to stem the flow when a bleed occurs.
10. We lost
Love your work Choccies, I cursed about every one of those at least once last night.
by Psyber » Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:53 pm
Well Port have a long established pattern of going purely defensive when in front and my wife, who was a Port supporter and came from a Port Adelaide linked family, first pointed it out to me.Chuck Wepner wrote:Do you think ? how insightful... of course don't give any credit to Port's opponent - they didn't lift or change their gameplan at all... psber with your revolutionary thought processes I'm amazed youre not coaching an AFL side now.. or perhaps you are?Psyber wrote:The Crows have a bit of work to do.
Too many handballs, especially to players already covered by opponents.
Too many kicks straight to opposition players standing there on their own - a kick to a contest would be better than that.
One ruckman??? It might have made sense if the one had been a Sandilands....
Both Fremantle and Port played a more direct style and both won.
[Though Port did their usual "take it easy and go defensive" once well in front, and nearly came unstuck as usual as a result.]
by The Dark Knight » Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:08 pm
by Voice » Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:53 pm
Brucetiki wrote:Voice wrote:Brucetiki wrote:10:10 10:30 still going to be flippin late - glad I don't have an early start tomorrow or I'd be watching the second half in bed!
The game will finish at 10:10, the coverage goes on until 10:30
Would you rather them play mid afternoon in 36 degree heat. Maybe it wasn't 36 there today but the AFL aren't to know that. It is very warm still in Perth this time of year.
Then play it Saturday night if they wanna play night games in Perth to escape the heat
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |