Booney wrote:Mark Bickley. Why not, he gets a go at other gigs without being qualified*.![]()
*My opinion only, not that of the H.O.F selection committee *
with Darryl Wakelin as an assistant?

by dedja » Tue Jun 02, 2009 1:36 pm
Booney wrote:Mark Bickley. Why not, he gets a go at other gigs without being qualified*.![]()
*My opinion only, not that of the H.O.F selection committee *
by stan » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:07 pm
overloaded wrote:dedja wrote:Highly unlikely and improbable, but could the tigers entice the Messiah from the sunshine state if he gives a rats toss bag about returning to the coaching foray?
The next dark horse is Damien Hardwick.
There is a rumour going around the Port Adelaide circles that Hardwick has spoken with the Power
by ezydoesitbigfella » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:48 pm
by Zelezny Chucks » Tue Jun 02, 2009 2:54 pm
by Pup » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:27 pm
by Gingernuts » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:31 pm
gadj1976 wrote:They need someone really stern to rid the cancers of the club, board included. The only one I can see doing that is Malthouse. They wont go with a 'new' coach, because the culture needs changing and that can't be on the new coach's agenda while they're still finding their way in the caper IMO.
Unfortunately for Richo, I reckon the new coach might end his career.
by dedja » Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:38 pm
by tigerhutch » Wed Jun 03, 2009 5:12 pm
by Pag » Wed Jun 03, 2009 6:36 pm
by Wedgie » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:39 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by CK » Wed Jun 03, 2009 8:56 pm
by bayman » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:20 pm
MightyEagles wrote:From the extreme left field BAYMAN.
by bayman » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:22 pm
by jointman » Wed Jun 03, 2009 10:47 pm
by Pup » Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:17 am
Pag wrote:Buckley for me. He has the drive to do it, you know he'll be doing everything possible, he understands the game like not many others. Nothing against anyone else thast's been mentioned, but I'd be talking to Buckley right now before the merry-go-round really starts and someone else grabs him.
The clean-out needs to start with Schulz, Hughes, Pettifer, McMahon, Oakley-Nicholls, Simmonds (got his five-year contract though so he won't go) and King. These guys have all had enough chances to cement spots and can't do it in a terrible side. Unfortunately, with the Gold Coast's entry, it's a bad time to start revamping a list, considering there aren't many high draft picks to grab with GC getting 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 etc
We haven't really timed it very well.
by Pag » Thu Jun 04, 2009 1:58 am
I understand that, but it takes more than one draft to turn a list from a bottom-two side to a premiership threat. Carlton for example, got Murphy, Kreuzer and Gibbs over three successive drafts, plus traded for Judd, and they're only mid-table still (heading upwards though).Pup wrote:Pag wrote:Buckley for me. He has the drive to do it, you know he'll be doing everything possible, he understands the game like not many others. Nothing against anyone else thast's been mentioned, but I'd be talking to Buckley right now before the merry-go-round really starts and someone else grabs him.
The clean-out needs to start with Schulz, Hughes, Pettifer, McMahon, Oakley-Nicholls, Simmonds (got his five-year contract though so he won't go) and King. These guys have all had enough chances to cement spots and can't do it in a terrible side. Unfortunately, with the Gold Coast's entry, it's a bad time to start revamping a list, considering there aren't many high draft picks to grab with GC getting 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9 etc
We haven't really timed it very well.
GC wont affect this years top picks..
by Dog_ger » Thu Jun 04, 2009 7:39 am
CK wrote:I would have thought that, if Mark Williams is ever going to go to Victoria, the timing is right for him in a number of ways.
by ORDoubleBlues » Tue Jun 09, 2009 11:33 pm
Gingernuts wrote:gadj1976 wrote:They need someone really stern to rid the cancers of the club, board included. The only one I can see doing that is Malthouse. They wont go with a 'new' coach, because the culture needs changing and that can't be on the new coach's agenda while they're still finding their way in the caper IMO.
Unfortunately for Richo, I reckon the new coach might end his career.
Isn't that what Terry Wallace was supposed to deliver?? He was supposed to be an experienced coach from outside the club who would bring order to chaos. That worked.![]()
At this stage I think even Jesus Christ would have trouble resurrecting Richmond.![]()
Tough gig, good luck to anyone who is willing to throw their hat in the ring. I for one would like to see a competitive Richmond.
by westozfalcon » Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:44 pm
by gadj1976 » Thu Jun 11, 2009 3:52 pm
Gingernuts wrote:gadj1976 wrote:They need someone really stern to rid the cancers of the club, board included. The only one I can see doing that is Malthouse. They wont go with a 'new' coach, because the culture needs changing and that can't be on the new coach's agenda while they're still finding their way in the caper IMO.
Unfortunately for Richo, I reckon the new coach might end his career.
Isn't that what Terry Wallace was supposed to deliver?? He was supposed to be an experienced coach from outside the club who would bring order to chaos. That worked.![]()
At this stage I think even Jesus Christ would have trouble resurrecting Richmond.![]()
Tough gig, good luck to anyone who is willing to throw their hat in the ring. I for one would like to see a competitive Richmond.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |