Adelaide Hawk wrote:
Geez you write some crap at times. Months later and you're still sooking.
LOL- poor Reb has at least 9 more months of sooking to do yet AH...

PS, well fished REB, was it a lure or good ol maggots on a hook?
by MatteeG » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:57 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:
Geez you write some crap at times. Months later and you're still sooking.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:14 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:They should never have changed this rule. Ever since the tough Hawks retired this club has been known for rushing behinds......
And to think Geelong's bad kicking has ended up in a victory for the metrosexuals.
regards,
REB
Geez you write some crap at times. Months later and you're still sooking.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:15 pm
MatteeG wrote:
LOL- poor Reb has at least 9 more months of sooking to do yet AH...![]()
PS, well fished REB, was it a lure or good ol maggots on a hook?
by redden whites » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:45 pm
Wedgie wrote:Any chance they can introduce this rule retrospectively starting at the beginning of Grand Final day last year?
Geelong would have won by 5 or 6 goals then!
by TEX07 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:29 pm
by Hawker » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:40 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:MatteeG wrote:
LOL- poor Reb has at least 9 more months of sooking to do yet AH...![]()
PS, well fished REB, was it a lure or good ol maggots on a hook?
Not easy on this site either Matteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. But you can always count on Hawker.![]()
by MatteeG » Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:44 pm
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Rik E Boy » Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:36 am
MatteeG wrote:LMAO @ Hawker- brilliant.
by Booney » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:05 am
by Hondo » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:46 am
rod_rooster wrote:Firstly the "massive" increase in rushed behinds? Might want to check the stats on that one. I think the large number of behinds that Hawthorn rushed in the biggest game of the year has clouded people's minds on this issue.
Secondly it's not Bowden or Richmond's fault that Essendon wouldn't man up. Whilst the tactic is not one you would want to see very often there are tactics coaches could employ to prevent it so i don't seen the need for a rule change. I think the major problem that needs to be overcome is the trying to beat the defensive zone. Reverting to make the players wait till the flags are waved will have a major impact on this. Sides will have a much better chance to man up thus making it much more difficult for the team kicking in. The appeal of rushing the behind will not be a great then. The rules were never broken and i'm not sure why the AFL felt they needed to change them.
by MatteeG » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:09 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:MatteeG wrote:LMAO @ Hawker- brilliant.
LMAO @ Matteeeeeeeeeeeeee. It wasn't that brilliant. Small things amuse small minds I guess. Seriously though, I don't think I've been moaning about the Hawks that badly. I don't feel as bad about 2008 as I did during the Blight era when we lost every time. No matter what happens no one can take 2007 away from us, even though the Hawks successfully took 2008 away from us.
Really looking forward to next year and seeing how Geelong respond to being knocked off and how Hawthorn respond to being 'the hunted'. Will another team step up and take over the Bullies mantle as the next biggest challenger?
regards,
REB
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Drop Bear » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:17 pm
MatteeG wrote:Hmm, maybe Brisbane?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |