Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Talk on the national game

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby MatteeG » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:57 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
Geez you write some crap at times. Months later and you're still sooking.


LOL- poor Reb has at least 9 more months of sooking to do yet AH... :D

PS, well fished REB, was it a lure or good ol maggots on a hook?
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 519 times
Been liked: 510 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby Rik E Boy » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:14 pm

Adelaide Hawk wrote:
Rik E Boy wrote:They should never have changed this rule. Ever since the tough Hawks retired this club has been known for rushing behinds......

And to think Geelong's bad kicking has ended up in a victory for the metrosexuals.

regards,

REB


Geez you write some crap at times. Months later and you're still sooking.


If the cap fits...if the cap fits...

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28590
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby Rik E Boy » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:15 pm

MatteeG wrote:
LOL- poor Reb has at least 9 more months of sooking to do yet AH... :D

PS, well fished REB, was it a lure or good ol maggots on a hook?


Not easy on this site either Matteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. But you can always count on Hawker. ;)

regards,

REB

ps - it was a metrosexual lure heh heh.
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28590
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby redden whites » Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:45 pm

Wedgie wrote:Any chance they can introduce this rule retrospectively starting at the beginning of Grand Final day last year?
Geelong would have won by 5 or 6 goals then! :D

Not if ol jelly legs Cam Mooney got to take the kicks Wedgie!
User avatar
redden whites
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1970
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2005 9:09 am
Location: On the way to Bonnie Doon
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 8 times
Grassroots Team: Jamestown-Peterborough

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby TEX07 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:29 pm

I would instruct players to put the ball out of bounds deliberately either on the full or via handball at least the onus is then on the oppostion to kick the goal from a tougher position (ie where the ball goes over the line) then if they score the goal only resulting in 6 points rather than 7. If they miss you regain control of the ball. Stupid rule regardless!
hola acabo de hacer que el yo se resuelve lo que este los medios en español
TEX07
League Bench Warmer
 
 
Posts: 1461
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 1:40 pm
Has liked: 140 times
Been liked: 49 times
Grassroots Team: Golden Grove

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby Hawker » Tue Dec 09, 2008 6:40 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
MatteeG wrote:
LOL- poor Reb has at least 9 more months of sooking to do yet AH... :D

PS, well fished REB, was it a lure or good ol maggots on a hook?


Not easy on this site either Matteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee. But you can always count on Hawker. ;)

??
User avatar
Hawker
Mini-League
 
 
Posts: 7
Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2005 8:11 am
Location: Canberra
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby MatteeG » Tue Dec 09, 2008 8:44 pm

LMAO @ Hawker- brilliant.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 519 times
Been liked: 510 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby Rik E Boy » Wed Dec 10, 2008 8:36 am

MatteeG wrote:LMAO @ Hawker- brilliant.


LMAO @ Matteeeeeeeeeeeeee. It wasn't that brilliant. Small things amuse small minds I guess. Seriously though, I don't think I've been moaning about the Hawks that badly. I don't feel as bad about 2008 as I did during the Blight era when we lost every time. No matter what happens no one can take 2007 away from us, even though the Hawks successfully took 2008 away from us.

Really looking forward to next year and seeing how Geelong respond to being knocked off and how Hawthorn respond to being 'the hunted'. Will another team step up and take over the Bullies mantle as the next biggest challenger?

regards,

REB
User avatar
Rik E Boy
Coach
 
 
Posts: 28590
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:55 pm
Location: The Switch
Has liked: 1773 times
Been liked: 1887 times

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby Booney » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:05 am

Please check the spelling of the thread title.

Should read Rushby Hinds. ;)
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61786
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8223 times
Been liked: 11957 times

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby Hondo » Wed Dec 10, 2008 9:46 am

rod_rooster wrote:Firstly the "massive" increase in rushed behinds? Might want to check the stats on that one. I think the large number of behinds that Hawthorn rushed in the biggest game of the year has clouded people's minds on this issue.

Secondly it's not Bowden or Richmond's fault that Essendon wouldn't man up. Whilst the tactic is not one you would want to see very often there are tactics coaches could employ to prevent it so i don't seen the need for a rule change. I think the major problem that needs to be overcome is the trying to beat the defensive zone. Reverting to make the players wait till the flags are waved will have a major impact on this. Sides will have a much better chance to man up thus making it much more difficult for the team kicking in. The appeal of rushing the behind will not be a great then. The rules were never broken and i'm not sure why the AFL felt they needed to change them.


1 - there was a 20% increase in 2008 and the coaches have warned the AFL that they will increase even more next season if the AFL do nothing

2 - manning up isn't the answer. It's the zone that's got the defenders baffled in the first place so they aren't about to go off and man up to stop Joel Bowden dawdling back over the line of Mark Williams kicking an "own goal" when in the clear 30m out :shock: Waiting to wave the flags is a backwards step that just gives more time to get the zone set up. Let the defenders have an opportunity for a fast break and they might just get it out of there (provided the point was NOT from a deliberate rushed behind).

PS: Good to see the Hawks fans out in force in a rushed behinds thread :lol: I think you won fair and square, don't you? ;)
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby MatteeG » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:09 pm

Rik E Boy wrote:
MatteeG wrote:LMAO @ Hawker- brilliant.


LMAO @ Matteeeeeeeeeeeeee. It wasn't that brilliant. Small things amuse small minds I guess. Seriously though, I don't think I've been moaning about the Hawks that badly. I don't feel as bad about 2008 as I did during the Blight era when we lost every time. No matter what happens no one can take 2007 away from us, even though the Hawks successfully took 2008 away from us.

Really looking forward to next year and seeing how Geelong respond to being knocked off and how Hawthorn respond to being 'the hunted'. Will another team step up and take over the Bullies mantle as the next biggest challenger?

regards,

REB


I have been surprised at your lack of usual hawk hunting...

Agreed looking forward to next year- will the cats bounce back? I am sure they will.
How will the hawks respond to being the hunted? Not sure, although I dont think we really 'snuck up' on teams much this year.
Have no idea who could be the surprise packet- there is always one. Hmm, maybe Brisbane? If they can learn to run the season out...
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
User avatar
MatteeG
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4926
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 10:36 pm
Has liked: 519 times
Been liked: 510 times
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Rushed Behinds - Trial Rule for NAB Cup

Postby Drop Bear » Wed Dec 10, 2008 3:17 pm

MatteeG wrote:Hmm, maybe Brisbane?


I think we're just focusing on making the finals first Mattee!
1. M Hayden.
User avatar
Drop Bear
League - Top 5
 
 
Posts: 2833
Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 2:12 pm
Location: The Doghouse
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Hope Valley

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: arthur, Bing [Bot] and 21 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |