by Booney » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:22 am
by Rik E Boy » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:26 am
by Booney » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:31 am
Rik E Boy wrote:What's in it for you hey Booney? Well, if you were flying Virgin - nothing!.![]()
regards,
REB
by Rik E Boy » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:35 am
by Footy Chick » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:06 am
Dutchy wrote:No more DOOM![]()
Different name, same disgraceful surface
by Dirko » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:19 am
I'm a GLENELG supporter flying to Melbourne today.
Who with?
An aviation company....
Oh,Qantas,Virgin?
No neither we fly TIGER.
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:47 am
Footy Chick wrote:Dutchy wrote:No more DOOM![]()
Different name, same disgraceful surface
Actually, I did the DOOM tour on the thursday before the GF and the ground now looks really good. They've actually spent millions of dollars on heat lamps to stop so that the permenantly shaded areas of the stadium get just as much sun as the rest of it..
The new name? disgraceful..un-Australian (in more ways than one).
by Footy Chick » Wed Oct 29, 2008 11:53 am
by Dutchy » Wed Oct 29, 2008 7:37 pm
Footy Chick wrote:Hmm. I walked on it and it felt like carpet... I guess you can't please all the people all the time
by Dirko » Wed Oct 29, 2008 8:02 pm
Dutchy wrote:Footy Chick wrote:Hmm. I walked on it and it felt like carpet... I guess you can't please all the people all the time
ask the players what they think
by westozfalcon » Fri Oct 31, 2008 9:46 pm
by Dirko » Fri Oct 31, 2008 10:10 pm
westozfalcon wrote:I reckon it's ridiculous how the ABC refers to the stadium as 'Docklands'.
They should call it by it's official name, even if it includes that of a commercial sponsor.
by Psyber » Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:08 am
westozfalcon wrote:I reckon it's ridiculous how the ABC refers to the stadium as 'Docklands'.
They should call it by it's official name, even if it includes that of a commercial sponsor.
by McAlmanac » Sat Nov 01, 2008 6:40 pm
by heater31 » Sat Nov 01, 2008 9:16 pm
westozfalcon wrote:I reckon it's ridiculous how the ABC refers to the stadium as 'Docklands'.
They should call it by it's official name, even if it includes that of a commercial sponsor.
by Barto » Sat Nov 01, 2008 10:06 pm
rod_rooster wrote:SJABC wrote:rod_rooster wrote:How do you pronounce that correctly as well?
Pretty sure in pronounced like; El - thee - had
Docklands it is.
by Punk Rooster » Sun Nov 02, 2008 5:12 pm
McAlmanac wrote:The great stadiums of the world don't need sponsor names - MCG, San Siro, Old Trafford, Prospect Oval...
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Dog_ger » Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:15 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:McAlmanac wrote:The great stadiums of the world don't need sponsor names - MCG, San Siro, Old Trafford, Prospect Oval...
corrected a minor mistake
by The Lethal 1 » Thu Nov 13, 2008 1:45 am
by Dutchy » Thu Nov 13, 2008 12:21 pm
The Lethal 1 wrote:I have three points to make on this subject,
First...Why couldn't they change the name to the Etihad Dome as to still have the option to call it just "The Dome" like people do when they refer to the Melbourne Cricket Ground as "The G."
Second...The reason for the change of sponsorship over the Docklands Stadium is because the AFL need as much money as they can get so they can pay for it and take over the ownership of the stadium, they still owe a fair few million.
Third...The surface has improved significantly in the past few years due to the fact that they are opening the roof as much as possible as well as using special hydroponic lights on the parts of the surface that don't enough sunlight.
Cheers!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |