mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturtpeter wrote:Cp!
I rate both the Dogs and Hawks above the Cats.
you got issues then!!!!!!!!!
sturtpeter has issues



by rod_rooster » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:07 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:sturtpeter wrote:Cp!
I rate both the Dogs and Hawks above the Cats.
you got issues then!!!!!!!!!
by hearts on fire » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:07 pm
gadj1976 wrote:my nomination for the most ridiculous thread of the year, this one.
by rod_rooster » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:09 pm
gadj1976 wrote:my nomination for the most ridiculous thread of the year, this one.
by gadj1976 » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:17 pm
rod_rooster wrote:gadj1976 wrote:my nomination for the most ridiculous thread of the year, this one.
To be fair to sturtpeter he has started dozens of threads that would be eligible for that title. In fact i reckon he'd have the top twenty covered pretty easily. How do you split the ridiculousness of one sturtpeter thread with that of another?
by rod_rooster » Sat Jul 05, 2008 8:21 pm
gadj1976 wrote:rod_rooster wrote:gadj1976 wrote:my nomination for the most ridiculous thread of the year, this one.
To be fair to sturtpeter he has started dozens of threads that would be eligible for that title. In fact i reckon he'd have the top twenty covered pretty easily. How do you split the ridiculousness of one sturtpeter thread with that of another?
RR, simple. Normally I ignore anything Sturtpeter starts. However I didn't know who NC was until I read the 2nd post!
by NFC » Sun Jul 06, 2008 2:59 am
locky801 wrote:Craig will sign a 3 year deal within weeks for the Crows
by fester69 » Sun Jul 06, 2008 12:00 pm
by Psyber » Sun Jul 06, 2008 1:00 pm
fester69 wrote:Please stay were you are NC, we are trying to move forward at Norwood.
by Adelaide Hawk » Sun Jul 06, 2008 5:35 pm
Psyber wrote:fester69 wrote:Please stay were you are NC, we are trying to move forward at Norwood.
Although I'd still suggest having a chat to Peter Rohde again!
by Tassie Blues » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:23 pm
sturtpeter wrote:Cp!
I rate both the Dogs and Hawks above the Cats.
by Wedgie » Sun Jul 06, 2008 11:33 pm
Tassie Blues wrote:sturtpeter wrote:Cp!
I rate both the Dogs and Hawks above the Cats.
i was giving you some slack coz ur a sturt fan n cop a bit on here but that is crazy talk! Dogs or Hawks will do well to get withing 5 goals of the cats in the grand final!
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by rod_rooster » Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:38 am
Wedgie wrote:Tassie Blues wrote:sturtpeter wrote:Cp!
I rate both the Dogs and Hawks above the Cats.
i was giving you some slack coz ur a sturt fan n cop a bit on here but that is crazy talk! Dogs or Hawks will do well to get withing 5 goals of the cats in the grand final!
Spot on.
Hawks and Dogs aren't close to the Cats, only side that worries the Cats is Collingwood.
by Wedgie » Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:01 am
rod_rooster wrote:Interesting you say that considering Geelong haven't played either the Dogs or Hawthorn yet.
rod_rooster wrote:Whilst i can't see the Cats being too concerned with either the Dogs or Hawthorn i also don't think they'd be overly fussed by the massively overrated Collingwood either. The Pies won't go close to being a threat this year. They really are not that good.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Strawb » Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:35 am
Wedgie wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Interesting you say that considering Geelong haven't played either the Dogs or Hawthorn yet.
Geelong have played Footscray and Hawthorn many times over the years.rod_rooster wrote:Whilst i can't see the Cats being too concerned with either the Dogs or Hawthorn i also don't think they'd be overly fussed by the massively overrated Collingwood either. The Pies won't go close to being a threat this year. They really are not that good.
Wrong there mate, Collingwood are the only tam that has a gameplan to worry the Cats, the proof is in the pudding.
Even at our dominant best over the last 2 years, Collingwood have never lost by less than 2 goals to us and have won by almot 15 goals against us.
If Collingwood weren't in the AFL Geelong would have their name on the next 10 Premiership cups already.
by Adelaide Hawk » Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:53 pm
by sturtpeter » Mon Jul 21, 2008 3:03 pm
by NFC » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:17 pm
by JK » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:21 pm
NFC wrote:I bet Walker's not playing because he doesn't dominate on the training track.
by NFC » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:27 pm
Constance_Perm wrote:NFC wrote:I bet Walker's not playing because he doesn't dominate on the training track.
Wouldn't surprise if he doesn't because he was spent at times in the 1st and 3rd quarters on Saturday, which at SANFL level says a bit.
by JK » Mon Jul 21, 2008 7:53 pm
NFC wrote:Constance_Perm wrote:NFC wrote:I bet Walker's not playing because he doesn't dominate on the training track.
Wouldn't surprise if he doesn't because he was spent at times in the 1st and 3rd quarters on Saturday, which at SANFL level says a bit.
Yeh I think fitness, not lack of defensive pressure, is the main reason why he's not playing. Still, Jericho and Tippett have only been playning 50% (or slightly more) so I think Walker could handle that.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |