by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:10 pm
by Blue Boy » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:29 pm
sydney-dog wrote:hondo
Craigy cops a flogging each and every week, however, Williams does not make a change well in to the final term, and nobody raises an eye brow, that he was slow to react in the box
by MW » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:31 pm
by carey18 » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:34 pm
by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:38 pm
by carey18 » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:39 pm
by sydney-dog » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:43 pm
by RoosterMarty » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:48 pm
MW wrote:Loosing a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd best side is a choke in my book
Lets not forget that they had 10 premiership players in their 22 vs Geelongs one
by MW » Mon Oct 01, 2007 8:50 pm
RoosterMarty wrote:MW wrote:Loosing a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd best side is a choke in my book
Lets not forget that they had 10 premiership players in their 22 vs Geelongs one
That one for Geelong had doughnuts in his only flag as well!
by RustyCage » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:14 pm
MW wrote:Loosing a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd best side is a choke in my book
Lets not forget that they had 10 premiership players in their 22 vs Geelongs one
by carey18 » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:39 pm
pafc1870 wrote:MW wrote:Loosing a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd best side is a choke in my book
Lets not forget that they had 10 premiership players in their 22 vs Geelongs one
A choke! I suppose Melbourne choked against Essendon in 2000! Being up by 10 goals and losing would be a choke. Being the dominant team all year and losing by 20 goals would be a choke. Getting smashed by the dominant team is not a choke.
How many premiership players did Port have in 2004 compared to Brisbane? It means very little.
by MW » Mon Oct 01, 2007 9:41 pm
pafc1870 wrote:MW wrote:Loosing a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd best side is a choke in my book
Lets not forget that they had 10 premiership players in their 22 vs Geelongs one
A choke! I suppose Melbourne choked against Essendon in 2000! Being up by 10 goals and losing would be a choke. Being the dominant team all year and losing by 20 goals would be a choke. Getting smashed by the dominant team is not a choke.
How many premiership players did Port have in 2004 compared to Brisbane? It means very little.
by RustyCage » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:01 pm
MW wrote:pafc1870 wrote:MW wrote:Loosing a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd best side is a choke in my book
Lets not forget that they had 10 premiership players in their 22 vs Geelongs one
A choke! I suppose Melbourne choked against Essendon in 2000! Being up by 10 goals and losing would be a choke. Being the dominant team all year and losing by 20 goals would be a choke. Getting smashed by the dominant team is not a choke.
How many premiership players did Port have in 2004 compared to Brisbane? It means very little.
They choked dude, no matter how you spin it. To loose a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd ranked side was a CHOKE![]()
by RustyCage » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:02 pm
carey18 wrote:pafc1870 wrote:MW wrote:Loosing a GF by 20 goals when you were the 2nd best side is a choke in my book
Lets not forget that they had 10 premiership players in their 22 vs Geelongs one
A choke! I suppose Melbourne choked against Essendon in 2000! Being up by 10 goals and losing would be a choke. Being the dominant team all year and losing by 20 goals would be a choke. Getting smashed by the dominant team is not a choke.
How many premiership players did Port have in 2004 compared to Brisbane? It means very little.
If it means little how come willams used it as a talking point during the week and how it was good for his team to have it?
by Hondo » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:10 pm
sydney-dog wrote:agree Port did not choke, however Port's pre-match strategy and match day performance from coaches to players was very very ordinary
sydney-dog wrote:ask yourself, if the boot was on the other foot, would the power supporters just sit their quietly
by am Bays » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:15 pm
pafc1870 wrote:I think we have very different definitions of the word choke.
by RustyCage » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:21 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:pafc1870 wrote:I think we have very different definitions of the word choke.
Let me guess, a choke under your defintion is when Adelaide lose....When Port lose its because they lost to the better side on the day (like the showdowns this year and whenever you play us in teh finals) .......![]()
by devilsadvocate » Mon Oct 01, 2007 10:34 pm
carey18 wrote:Getting a bit bored with all this talk about nothing was going to stop the cats and all that. If you are out there playing and things arnt going well dont you man up and play man on man and beat your oppenent?. Y talk it up all week then serve up that crap and now say no one would of got close. Easy cop out in my book
by Dutchy » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:03 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:
The Kangas wouldn't have got any closer.
by GWW » Mon Oct 01, 2007 11:17 pm
Dutchy wrote:devilsadvocate wrote:
The Kangas wouldn't have got any closer.
But we did on the same ground, same opposition 3 weeks earlier...
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |