by sydney-dog » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:28 pm
by CUTTERMAN » Sat Sep 15, 2007 11:40 pm
by sydney-dog » Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:27 am
by Mr66 » Sun Sep 16, 2007 12:29 am
sydney-dog wrote:CUTTERMAN
I would also think that the Magpies would need to make some room under the Cap, Didak would free up about $400k per year
by Blue Boy » Mon Sep 17, 2007 12:01 pm
sydney-dog wrote:the Hawks will also flag their interest in Kenny McGregor
by Hondo » Mon Sep 17, 2007 2:04 pm
Blue Boy wrote:sydney-dog wrote:the Hawks will also flag their interest in Kenny McGregor
Really - I thought they were only playin there kids !!!
by Punk Rooster » Tue Sep 18, 2007 1:23 pm
sydney-dog wrote:NFC
Hang on, how can the Pies ask for a first round
they have a one warning clause in Didak's contract, this alone say's he is not an untouchable and a potential risk
if he is worth a first round pick, then remove the clause
you can't have you cake and eat it
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by sydney-dog » Tue Sep 18, 2007 8:12 pm
by sydney-dog » Fri Sep 21, 2007 10:44 pm
by Wedgie » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:17 pm
sydney-dog wrote:Farmer resigns
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by Psyber » Fri Sep 21, 2007 11:24 pm
by brod » Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:23 am
by Hondo » Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:51 am
brod wrote:Age wise Hawthorn has the youngest list for 2007 (22 years and 82 days) with Carlton next at 22 years and 110 days.
At the other end the Crows are the oldest (24 years 126 days) next is Fremantle 24 years 28 days)
Games played the most inexperienced side (ave games) is once again Hawthorn 48 games, next is the Power 49 games
The most experienced side (ave games) is Fremantle with 76 games.
Hondo, dont know if you would like to retract!!!!
by rod_rooster » Sun Sep 23, 2007 8:58 am
by Hondo » Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:08 am
rod_rooster wrote:Take Vandenburg, Smith and Dixon off that list as well. Fair bit of age and experience that has retired. No doubt they will be replaced by guys younger than them so the Hawthorn list isn't as old and experienced as you would try to have people believe hondo
by rod_rooster » Sun Sep 23, 2007 9:41 am
hondo71 wrote:rod_rooster wrote:Take Vandenburg, Smith and Dixon off that list as well. Fair bit of age and experience that has retired. No doubt they will be replaced by guys younger than them so the Hawthorn list isn't as old and experienced as you would try to have people believe hondo
Every team has a few older guys retiring so all the averages will come down![]()
Anyway, I am not saying their list is old - all I am saying is their best 22 is far from inexperienced
by redden whites » Sun Sep 23, 2007 2:23 pm
by Psyber » Sun Sep 23, 2007 4:22 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:sydney-dog wrote:NFC
Hang on, how can the Pies ask for a first round
they have a one warning clause in Didak's contract, this alone say's he is not an untouchable and a potential risk
if he is worth a first round pick, then remove the clause
you can't have you cake and eat it
What a stupid post.
Of course he's worth a 1st round pick- do you actually watch any games???
by redden whites » Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:29 pm
by Hondo » Sun Sep 23, 2007 7:57 pm
redden whites wrote:Hondo,please post a quote with the only playing kids line in it???????
My post said "probably the most inexpirienced side in the league" which in ave games terms and average age terms which has proven to be correct I see.
also I might point out that AGAIN that 24 of the list of 38 is under 70games so enough of this top 24-28 rubbish please.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |