Re: 2017 Off-Season
Posted: Mon Nov 20, 2017 3:42 pm
MW wrote:you developed a stutter wubbsy?
No, just tex with the case of the sooks
MW wrote:you developed a stutter wubbsy?
woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:you developed a stutter wubbsy?
No, just tex with the case of the sooks
woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:you developed a stutter wubbsy?
No, just tex with the case of the sooks
MW wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:you developed a stutter wubbsy?
No, just tex with the case of the sooks
I think my sarcasm meter is turned up too high...
woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:you developed a stutter wubbsy?
No, just tex with the case of the sooks
I think my sarcasm meter is turned up too high...
No i got it just didn’t want to miss an opportunity to give some grief to tex
MW wrote:I'm sure he's reading SA Footy also to add to his pain
mots02 wrote:
You thought he was poor in the GF, Really? Why have you never mentioned this before?
Booney wrote:mots02 wrote:
You thought he was poor in the GF, Really? Why have you never mentioned this before?
Been a busy few weeks.
mots02 wrote:Booney wrote:mots02 wrote:
You thought he was poor in the GF, Really? Why have you never mentioned this before?
Been a busy few weeks.
Lift your game
Booney wrote:mots02 wrote:Booney wrote:mots02 wrote:
You thought he was poor in the GF, Really? Why have you never mentioned this before?
Been a busy few weeks.
Lift your game
We'll dissect every minute of the game in intricate detail through the summer.
We'll kick it off tomorrow with "The Stare Down - Standing in a line, like men"
mots02 wrote:
Good topic! Is there also enough time to dissect Ports version of standing in a line, like men?
mots02 wrote:Come on mate, he was poor in that GF loss, he's got loads to work through already.
woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:MW wrote:you developed a stutter wubbsy?
No, just tex with the case of the sooks
I think my sarcasm meter is turned up too high...
No i got it just didn’t want to miss an opportunity to give some grief to tex
MW wrote:He'd have to spell Google first
woodublieve12 wrote:To be fair I don’t think it’s been mentioned enough