by Coach Bombay » Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:07 pm
by cripple » Thu Jun 20, 2013 7:41 pm
by stan » Thu Jun 20, 2013 7:51 pm
cripple wrote:Will get laughed at for this but the crows seem to be in a similar pattern to Geelong of 2004-2006. Had a good year (cats in 05) that displayed some potential but fell of the year after. Crows are the 4th or 5th youngest list in the league and the player's we will lose in the next few years such as Reilly, Johncock and Tambling will be more a positive then negative for us. Main ones we need to cover are Rutten mainly and Thompson to a lesser extent. Hopefully with the extra cash we have in the cap after the Tippett debacle the club can attract someone that will go.someway to covering our Draft penalties.
Sent from my GT-I9305T using Tapatalk 2
by Jim05 » Thu Jun 20, 2013 8:35 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:30 am
cripple wrote:Will get laughed at for this but the crows seem to be in a similar pattern to Geelong of 2004-2006. Had a good year (cats in 05) that displayed some potential but fell of the year after. Crows are the 4th or 5th youngest list in the league and the player's we will lose in the next few years such as Reilly, Johncock and Tambling will be more a positive then negative for us. Main ones we need to cover are Rutten mainly and Thompson to a lesser extent. Hopefully with the extra cash we have in the cap after the Tippett debacle the club can attract someone that will go.someway to covering our Draft penalties.
Sent from my GT-I9305T using Tapatalk 2
by stan » Fri Jun 21, 2013 8:54 am
Jim05 wrote:Has been mentioned that the Cows are after LeCras who is a free agent at end of year
by Hefty » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:58 am
Rik E Boy wrote:cripple wrote:Will get laughed at for this but the crows seem to be in a similar pattern to Geelong of 2004-2006. Had a good year (cats in 05) that displayed some potential but fell of the year after. Crows are the 4th or 5th youngest list in the league and the player's we will lose in the next few years such as Reilly, Johncock and Tambling will be more a positive then negative for us. Main ones we need to cover are Rutten mainly and Thompson to a lesser extent. Hopefully with the extra cash we have in the cap after the Tippett debacle the club can attract someone that will go.someway to covering our Draft penalties.
Sent from my GT-I9305T using Tapatalk 2
You wish. The Cats made the Prelim in 2004. We had Bartel, Ablett, Johnson, Corey, Enright, Mackie, Scarlett, Mooney and you have Dangerfield the end. If Tex comes back Adelaide will improve but I can't see you winning a flag once those draft penalties begin to bit.
regards,
REB
by Stumps » Fri Jun 21, 2013 11:54 am
by Mr Beefy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 12:00 pm
Hefty wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:cripple wrote:Will get laughed at for this but the crows seem to be in a similar pattern to Geelong of 2004-2006. Had a good year (cats in 05) that displayed some potential but fell of the year after. Crows are the 4th or 5th youngest list in the league and the player's we will lose in the next few years such as Reilly, Johncock and Tambling will be more a positive then negative for us. Main ones we need to cover are Rutten mainly and Thompson to a lesser extent. Hopefully with the extra cash we have in the cap after the Tippett debacle the club can attract someone that will go.someway to covering our Draft penalties.
Sent from my GT-I9305T using Tapatalk 2
You wish. The Cats made the Prelim in 2004. We had Bartel, Ablett, Johnson, Corey, Enright, Mackie, Scarlett, Mooney and you have Dangerfield the end. If Tex comes back Adelaide will improve but I can't see you winning a flag once those draft penalties begin to bit.
regards,
REB
REB, the similarities are there......
Bartel > Sloane
Ablett > Dangerfield
Mooney = Walker (this is being harsh on TEX cos Mooney was a spud of the highest order!)
Mackie > Smith
Scarlett > Talia
Enright > Laird
Johnson > Crouch
Selwood > ?
Ottens > ?
Corey > ?
Milburn >
Chapman >
Kelly = ?
etc..
Regards,
Hefty
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:17 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:20 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:21 pm
Stumps wrote:I was with you until the bottom two hefty !
by Mr Beefy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:21 pm
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:27 pm
Mr Beefy wrote:Thought I'd give Hefty and the crows one equivalent...
by Hefty » Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:34 pm
Rik E Boy wrote:Nah Beefy
Mooney>Walker.
People forget how good Moons was as his best was 2001-2006. By the time the Cats graduated Moons was in decline. When were losing by three goals every week Mooney was absolutely massive in a multitude of positions. Walker is a one trick pony...good trick, but throw him at CHB and in the Ruck then try and tell me he is as good as Mooney.
regards,
REB
by Booney » Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:29 pm
Hefty wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:cripple wrote:Will get laughed at for this but the crows seem to be in a similar pattern to Geelong of 2004-2006. Had a good year (cats in 05) that displayed some potential but fell of the year after. Crows are the 4th or 5th youngest list in the league and the player's we will lose in the next few years such as Reilly, Johncock and Tambling will be more a positive then negative for us. Main ones we need to cover are Rutten mainly and Thompson to a lesser extent. Hopefully with the extra cash we have in the cap after the Tippett debacle the club can attract someone that will go.someway to covering our Draft penalties.
Sent from my GT-I9305T using Tapatalk 2
You wish. The Cats made the Prelim in 2004. We had Bartel, Ablett, Johnson, Corey, Enright, Mackie, Scarlett, Mooney and you have Dangerfield the end. If Tex comes back Adelaide will improve but I can't see you winning a flag once those draft penalties begin to bit.
regards,
REB
REB, the similarities are there......
Bartel = Sloane
Ablett = Dangerfield
Mooney = Walker (this is being harsh on TEX cos Mooney was a spud of the highest order!)
Mackie = Smith
Scarlett = Talia
Enright = Laird
Johnson = Crouch
Regards,
Hefty
by Rik E Boy » Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:01 pm
Hefty wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:Nah Beefy
Mooney>Walker.
People forget how good Moons was as his best was 2001-2006. By the time the Cats graduated Moons was in decline. When were losing by three goals every week Mooney was absolutely massive in a multitude of positions. Walker is a one trick pony...good trick, but throw him at CHB and in the Ruck then try and tell me he is as good as Mooney.
regards,
REB
Mooney was the most overated player in the Cats lineup. Easy to kick (or should i say miss) goals when you have quality delivery each week from the likes of Ablett, Corey, Sloane...sorry Bartel etc....
by Stumps » Fri Jun 21, 2013 7:42 pm
by cripple » Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:10 pm
by Rik E Boy » Sat Jun 22, 2013 1:24 am
Stumps wrote:I'm with you REB about this crows v cats argument but to say mooney was at his peak when bartel was in the twos is a fallacy. He was AA in 2007 and had a good patch between 2005-2010 where he was a serviceable forward. In 2002-4 he received all 1 of his 13 brownlow votes and by 2005 bartel was somewhere between a good player and a gun. I know you are a die hard cat, but reckon your memory is inflated of moons due to the passion and effort he put in in the early 00's rather than the quality of his footy. Just an opinion Too FWIW
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |