SA Footy

the milky bar kid wrote:Pretty sure Port blocking the move is just to ensure that they get Richardson's contract paid out.

If he walks away what would Port need his contract paid out for, they wouldn't have to pay him?

If they have matched St.Kilda FC's offer than what a stupid decision from an admin point of view. If the bloke was that important to your set up why didn't you pay him that in the first place and once you chase people back from that scenario and throw cash it's not right now but eventually you will regret the actions .There would be more behind the scenes but you're better off letting the bloke go.....

Koch ... all piss and wind, looks like a Kock now.

Alan Richardson now officially coach.

dedja wrote:Koch ... all piss and wind, looks like a Kock now.

Alan Richardson now officially coach.

Koch was never really blocking it, just getting St Kilda to now foot the bill associated with finding a replacement. Good move.

Very smart move by Kochy, this sort of thing would not of been thought of in previous years, its about time the club toughened up.
$200K minimum i say.

Mr Beefy wrote:

the milky bar kid wrote:Pretty sure Port blocking the move is just to ensure that they get Richardson's contract paid out.

If he walks away what would Port need his contract paid out for, they wouldn't have to pay him?

Sorry, I meant foot the bill of replacing him.
The dangers of posting quickly at work!

Apparently negotiations stalled until St Kilda agreed to chuck $200 on Wakelins metro card

So who will hold Abe Simpsons hand in the coaches box this year ???

Trader wrote:

dedja wrote:Koch ... all piss and wind, looks like a Kock now.

Alan Richardson now officially coach.

Koch was never really blocking it, just getting St Kilda to now foot the bill associated with finding a replacement. Good move.

I liked the bit where he complained about having to pay for another clubs incompetence. Luckily no one has ever paid for Port being incompetent.

dedja wrote:Koch ... all piss and wind, looks like a Kock now.

Alan Richardson now officially coach.

If I had a a picture of a hand fiercely stroking a shaft I would post it but alas dedja I don't so you escape my wrath.

There was a Power logo like that in the early days ...

dedja wrote:There was a Power logo like that in the early days ...

Still got that T-shirt....

Ahmed Saad gets a 18 month suspension for his drug charges

Brodlach wrote:Ahmed Saad gets a 18 month suspension for his drug charges

disgrace. bit harsh of a ban...
so he accidently takes something and get 18 months, gee when/if they start handing out infraction notices to the bombers who willingly took banned drugs, there penalty MUST be more then Saads...

woodublieve12 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Ahmed Saad gets a 18 month suspension for his drug charges

disgrace. bit harsh of a ban...
so he accidently takes something and get 18 months, gee when/if they start handing out infraction notices to the bombers who willingly took banned drugs, there penalty MUST be more then Saads...

Certainly sets a precedence, doesn't it?

Rules and Rules

Got off lightly, should've got 3 years for stupidity.

Max penalty is 2 years, so who is stupid?

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Ahmed Saad gets a 18 month suspension for his drug charges

disgrace. bit harsh of a ban...
so he accidently takes something and get 18 months, gee when/if they start handing out infraction notices to the bombers who willingly took banned drugs, there penalty MUST be more then Saads...

Certainly sets a precedence, doesn't it?

Think your missing the point.
No Essendon player has ever returned a positive test. If they do then they too will deservedly cop a 2 year ban. Id be surprised if anything more than 6-12 months will be dished out unless they have suddenly uncovered some new info

Jim05 wrote:

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:

Brodlach wrote:Ahmed Saad gets a 18 month suspension for his drug charges

disgrace. bit harsh of a ban...
so he accidently takes something and get 18 months, gee when/if they start handing out infraction notices to the bombers who willingly took banned drugs, there penalty MUST be more then Saads...

Certainly sets a precedence, doesn't it?

Think your missing the point.
No Essendon player has ever returned a positive test. If they do then they too will deservedly cop a 2 year ban. Id be surprised if anything more than 6-12 months will be dished out unless they have suddenly uncovered some new info

lack of positive test results didnt stop them banning lance armstrong....

tipper wrote:

Jim05 wrote:

Booney wrote:

woodublieve12 wrote:[quote="Brodlach"]Ahmed Saad gets a 18 month suspension for his drug charges

disgrace. bit harsh of a ban...
so he accidently takes something and get 18 months, gee when/if they start handing out infraction notices to the bombers who willingly took banned drugs, there penalty MUST be more then Saads...

Certainly sets a precedence, doesn't it?

Think your missing the point.
No Essendon player has ever returned a positive test. If they do then they too will deservedly cop a 2 year ban. Id be surprised if anything more than 6-12 months will be dished out unless they have suddenly uncovered some new info

lack of positive test results didnt stop them banning lance armstrong....[/quote]

Think you will find he tested positive