SA Footy

Eagles2014 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

Who is gone, Fagan or Pyke??

Possibly both, Pyke may have ad enough and just walks on is own accord.

Dutchy wrote:

Eagles2014 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

Who is gone, Fagan or Pyke??

Possibly both, Pyke may have ad enough and just walks on is own accord.

He wouldn't walk from two years of contract.

Booney wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Eagles2014 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

Who is gone, Fagan or Pyke??

Possibly both, Pyke may have ad enough and just walks on is own accord.

He wouldn't walk from two years of contract.

Depends on the payout offer

Booney wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Eagles2014 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

Who is gone, Fagan or Pyke??

Possibly both, Pyke may have ad enough and just walks on is own accord.

He wouldn't walk from two years of contract.

He would if they pay him out.

Booney wrote:

Dutchy wrote:

Eagles2014 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

Who is gone, Fagan or Pyke??

Possibly both, Pyke may have ad enough and just walks on is own accord.

He wouldn't walk from two years of contract.

He is apparently wealthy man, so could see him walking away if does not need all this BS. (they would come to some arrangement).

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

I've been deeply unimpressed with him for a while. Hoping he's one that gets trimmed out of all of this

mots02 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

I've been deeply unimpressed with him for a while. Hoping he's one that gets trimmed out of all of this

How deep?

mots02 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

I've been deeply unimpressed with him for a while. Hoping he's one that gets trimmed out of all of this

If you're running the show and you bring in external people to find out and tell you what's wrong with the show surely you're gone?

amber_fluid wrote:

mots02 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

I've been deeply unimpressed with him for a while. Hoping he's one that gets trimmed out of all of this

How deep?

Barry White deep

Booney wrote:

mots02 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

I've been deeply unimpressed with him for a while. Hoping he's one that gets trimmed out of all of this

If you're running the show and you bring in external people to find out and tell you what's wrong with the show surely you're gone?

Sound conclusion

Booney wrote:

mots02 wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Fagan, extremely unimpressive on AA this morning, I reckon he is gone

I've been deeply unimpressed with him for a while. Hoping he's one that gets trimmed out of all of this

If you're running the show and you bring in external people to find out and tell you what's wrong with the show surely you're gone?

You don't say

Ok, I've read the room, I'll tread gently around you blokes for a few weeks.

Booney wrote:Ok, I've read the room, I'll tread gently around you blokes for a few weeks.

no need. One things for sure, it's going to be a looooong off season.

Another thing amused me today...media been calling out for an external review of Crows most of the year. They do this, and Paul Roos tees off on them for arranging an external review.

Long off season again MW

MW wrote:

Booney wrote:Ok, I've read the room, I'll tread gently around you blokes for a few weeks.

no need. One things for sure, it's going to be a looooong off season.

Another thing amused me today...media been calling out for an external review of Crows most of the year. They do this, and Paul Roos tees off on them for arranging an external review.

I thought the same thing - Internal review and everyone says "oh its comprimised". External review and everyone says "what would those guys know". Cant win, welcome to footy media 101 I guess.

Bandit wrote:

MW wrote:

Booney wrote:Ok, I've read the room, I'll tread gently around you blokes for a few weeks.

no need. One things for sure, it's going to be a looooong off season.

Another thing amused me today...media been calling out for an external review of Crows most of the year. They do this, and Paul Roos tees off on them for arranging an external review.

I thought the same thing - Internal review and everyone says "oh its comprimised". External review and everyone says "what would those guys know". Cant win, welcome to footy media 101 I guess.

Yeah Whately cracked in last night too, using the argument that the best club turnarounds of late have been via internal review. Im not sure it's a one size fits all so was supposed by his strong stance on it.

I know clubs aren't run by supporters, but the weight of anger towards the club especially directed to the Burton, Roo, Pyke, Fagan, Hass, Reids etc means they cannot just do an internal review as they would be the ones doing it. They clearly require an external review.

IMO

Pyke stays (likely only the length of his contract)
Reid stays
Roo stays
Burton goes (fallout from camp, players don't trust him etc)
Hass stays
Fagan goes (he's the boss afterall…)

MW wrote:Roo stays

No arguments here!

#rooforpresident

RB wrote:

MW wrote:Roo stays

No arguments here!

#rooforpresident

Yep and if he doesn't like it he can be president for someone else.

amber_fluid wrote:
He would if they pay him out.

The Crow supporters seem to do enough of that.