White Line Fever wrote:So any suspension in the finals series does not affect your Brownlow chances?
doesn't look like it...it should be carried over to the next year
by jointman » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:02 pm
White Line Fever wrote:So any suspension in the finals series does not affect your Brownlow chances?
by JK » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:13 pm
by White Line Fever » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:20 pm
Wedgie wrote:The MVP is like the Cox Plate and the Brownlow is like the Melbourne Cup.
The best horse in the nation wins the Cox where quite often a scrubber gets up in the Melbourne Cup despite it being worth more money and prestige.
by tiger07andbeyond » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:20 pm
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by tiger07andbeyond » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:21 pm
White Line Fever wrote:Wedgie wrote:The MVP is like the Cox Plate and the Brownlow is like the Melbourne Cup.
The best horse in the nation wins the Cox where quite often a scrubber gets up in the Melbourne Cup despite it being worth more money and prestige.
Sorry I disagree with this.
The MVP is picked at the end of the season by blokes who have seen the players play at most twice that year.
The media would affect their choice, and it would be whoever is fresh in their minds.
(who remembered Judd got 5 BOG early this year)
The umpires vote on every game, on the day, and have the best view of the game and unbiased opinions.
The Brownlow has way more prestige and is the Best and Fairest as voted fairly.
Media Park wrote:You'd sort of hope to finish third in such a tightly contested year- get the cheap win over the fourth placed side for a bit of momentum.
by Drop Bear » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:22 pm
by White Line Fever » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:23 pm
tiger07andbeyond wrote:White Line Fever wrote:Wedgie wrote:The MVP is like the Cox Plate and the Brownlow is like the Melbourne Cup.
The best horse in the nation wins the Cox where quite often a scrubber gets up in the Melbourne Cup despite it being worth more money and prestige.
Sorry I disagree with this.
The MVP is picked at the end of the season by blokes who have seen the players play at most twice that year.
The media would affect their choice, and it would be whoever is fresh in their minds.
(who remembered Judd got 5 BOG early this year)
The umpires vote on every game, on the day, and have the best view of the game and unbiased opinions.
The Brownlow has way more prestige and is the Best and Fairest as voted fairly.
Well sorry we disagree with you. The MVP is the best player not the player with crap teammates
by GWW » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:23 pm
by JK » Tue Sep 21, 2010 3:25 pm
by Wedgie » Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:04 pm
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
by gadj1976 » Tue Sep 21, 2010 4:56 pm
Adelaide Hawk wrote:Leaping Lindner wrote:There were no winners tonight.
I feel the same way. I think Judd's win has done the football world a favour by opening their eyes to the fact that the Brownlow Medal is a farce. It's no longer relevant.
Judd 30, Hodge 16 ... umpires are wanting us to believe Judd had twice the season Hodge did? I don't think so. Even Judd himself said his season wasn't good enough to win ... he's right.
by Dirko » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:05 pm
White Line Fever wrote:So any suspension in the finals series does not affect your Brownlow chances?
A player also remains eligible for the Brownlow Medal under the following circumstances:
* if he is suspended during the finals or pre-season;
* if he serves a suspension in the current season which was earned for an offence committed late in the previous season;
* he receives any sort of club-imposed suspension which is not recognised by the AFL Tribunal;
* if he is found guilty by the AFL Tribunal of an offence which attracts only a financial penalty.
by Dirko » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:07 pm
Leaping Lindner wrote:Pity you didn't turn up.
by cokadonkeytoo » Tue Sep 21, 2010 5:52 pm
by Q. » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:14 pm
by Phantom Gossiper » Tue Sep 21, 2010 6:22 pm
cokadonkeytoo wrote:I feel sorry for Ablett, Judd should not have been eligible after he split Pav open earlier in the year. I agree he is an umpires favourite, but to a degree so is Ablett and Swan, its just the latter two had competition from people in their own sides.
Eddies face was the best part of the night, i wonder what his face will look like if they lose on Saturday, ill be watching just for that
by overloaded » Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:00 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Media Park » Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:55 pm
Quichey wrote:What's with the "Eddie's face" gags that everyone is carrying on with. The bloke has virtually a blank expression FFS and it's being extrapolated to him blowing a fuse
Wedgie wrote:I wear skin tight arseless leather pants, wtf do you wear?
by am Bays » Wed Sep 22, 2010 10:12 am
by RoosterMarty » Wed Sep 22, 2010 11:02 am
am Bays wrote:What do Rebecca Twiggly and Dane Swan have in common??
They both got F***** by Chris Judd on Brownlow Night....
![]()
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |