Page 7 of 11
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 6:39 pmby Brodlach
bennymacca wrote:I dont think he means you specifically Jim, but a lot of people did have us at 0-3
two teams that were finalists last year and one that everyone had in their finals at the start of the season is hardly average opposition. Though Richmond and Port hardly played like finalists, so maybe it wasnt as hard as everyone thought originally
Correct didn't mean you Jim, choose the wrong word, should have used most people.
Benny reckon you said you would be happy with a 4-6 start after 10 games, should get that at least?
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 6:45 pmby Spargo
JK wrote:Spargo wrote:Dutchy wrote:Saints have one of the oldest teams going around this weekend!
Reckon they'll win tomorrow.
Yeah I reckon they're a big chance too (lol watch em get pantsed now)
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 6:49 pmby Corona Man
I've been the kiss of death this season so far with my footy tips. I tipped the crows with a degree of confidence... Even that didn't work!
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:05 pmby bennymacca
Brodlach wrote:bennymacca wrote:I dont think he means you specifically Jim, but a lot of people did have us at 0-3
two teams that were finalists last year and one that everyone had in their finals at the start of the season is hardly average opposition. Though Richmond and Port hardly played like finalists, so maybe it wasnt as hard as everyone thought originally
Correct didn't mean you Jim, choose the wrong word, should have used most people.
Benny reckon you said you would be happy with a 4-6 start after 10 games, should get that at least?
This is what i had for our next 7 games, with my new estimates (old estimates in brackets)
Syd (h) 40 (40)
Haw (a) 30 (10)
Freo (h) 60 (20)
Dogs (a) 30 (40)
Geel (h) 50 (50)
Gc (a) 60 (70)
Gws (h) 60 (80)
thats another 3.3 wins in our next 7, which would give us 5.3 from 10. So we are already 1 win ahead of where i thought we would be
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:32 pmby JK
Excellent last quarter at the SCG. Giants play some great footy
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 7:41 pmby bennymacca
JK wrote:Excellent last quarter at the SCG. Giants play some great footy
yeah swans too good in the end, but they had a real crack
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:10 pmby stan
bennymacca wrote:I dont think he means you specifically Jim, but a lot of people did have us at 0-3
two teams that were finalists last year and one that everyone had in their finals at the start of the season is hardly average opposition. Though Richmond and Port hardly played like finalists, so maybe it wasnt as hard as everyone thought originally
Port look like shit at the moment.
Richmond well...............they look as they are struggling as well.
Still the crows looked good. Played well. I tipped the crows as I thought they would be too good.
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:11 pmby stan
Jim05 wrote:It's over, great move by the paper Tigers to sign up Hardwick, they are going nowhere.
Good win by the Saints too
On the saints they have improved quite a bit and seem to be heading in the right direction.
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:14 pmby stan
Charlie Curnow, like the look of him. Blues just need to hold here a bit,
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:20 pmby stan
Thomas just a few minutes he would like to forget. Found the ball and every touch was stuffed.
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:53 pmby JK
I know it couldn't be an easy one to adjudicate, but FFS I wish they'd get some consistenccy about these short passes being called play on
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:04 pmby bennymacca
JK wrote:I know it couldn't be an easy one to adjudicate, but FFS I wish they'd get some consistenccy about these short passes being called play on
It is consistent. Do it in the back half its 25m, in the forward line its 8m
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:43 pmby woodublieve12
I reckon Luke Parker could have 9 Brownlow votes after this round... On fire
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:46 pmby Chuck Wepner
bennymacca wrote:Jim05 wrote:Corona Man wrote:Maybe you blokes are top 4 material BMac?
Bit early for that I think, they are going very well but have played a couple of pretty ordinary sides.
They will definately play finals but not sure of top 4 material yet
I think It's definitely time we all learnt to spell the word DEFINITELY the right way.
And FWIW I think the Crows are a definite GF threat in 2016
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 10:22 pmby JK
Fair goal from the Pav
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:09 pmby FlyingHigh
bennymacca wrote:JK wrote:I know it couldn't be an easy one to adjudicate, but FFS I wish they'd get some consistenccy about these short passes being called play on
It is consistent. Do it in the back half its 25m, in the forward line its 8m
Just go back to 10mt. Has been one of the most pointless rule changes ever and even after all this time is not adjudicated properly.
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:10 pmby FlyingHigh
bennymacca wrote:JK wrote:I know it couldn't be an easy one to adjudicate, but FFS I wish they'd get some consistenccy about these short passes being called play on
It is consistent. Do it in the back half its 25m, in the forward line its 8m
Just go back to 10mt. Has been one of the most pointless rule changes ever and even after all this time is not adjudicated properly.
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:21 pmby bennymacca
i think 15m is good, but I do agree that they seem to change interpretation quite a lot
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:44 pmby gadj1976
Changing the rule from 10m to 15m is just nuts. And I really can't stand changing rules when it's subjective. When they changed the mark rule from 10m to 15m I said it was crazy because all you're doing is changing the subjectivity. It's still grey. NUTZ!
Re: Round 3....and they start to appear.
Posted:
Sat Apr 09, 2016 11:47 pmby bennymacca
every rule is grey though, thats like saying dont have a 50m penalty. Or a holding the ball rule.
I think in general it is a good thing, just that they too often make it 20m in the back half