by brod » Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:46 pm
by Pup » Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:49 pm
by brod » Thu Nov 08, 2007 11:55 pm
Pup wrote:Just one correction if it is the player i am thinking off, It is Jamie Allen from Box Hill. (Pedantic i know)
by FlyingHigh » Fri Nov 09, 2007 10:21 am
brod wrote:Jake Orreal (no previous club);
by GWW » Fri Nov 09, 2007 12:48 pm
FlyingHigh wrote:brod wrote:Jake Orreal (no previous club);
??
by sasquatch » Fri Nov 09, 2007 3:10 pm
by Andy #24 » Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:32 pm
Dog_ger wrote:Collingwoods' Alan Didak is a Crow.... 98.7665%
Only time will tell...?
Know any more...?
by Psyber » Fri Nov 09, 2007 6:53 pm
Andy #24 wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Collingwoods' Alan Didak is a Crow.... 98.7665%
Only time will tell...?
Know any more...?
Unlucky mate, there was only 1.2335% chance, but you were wrong
by magpie in the 80's » Mon Nov 19, 2007 5:22 pm
by Punk Rooster » Tue Nov 20, 2007 11:45 am
Psyber wrote:Andy #24 wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Collingwoods' Alan Didak is a Crow.... 98.7665%
Only time will tell...?
Know any more...?
Unlucky mate, there was only 1.2335% chance, but you were wrong
WHAT A RELIEF! I didn't want the Crows to take him on.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things
by Blue Boy » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:02 pm
Psyber wrote:Andy #24 wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Collingwoods' Alan Didak is a Crow.... 98.7665%
Only time will tell...?
Know any more...?
Unlucky mate, there was only 1.2335% chance, but you were wrong
WHAT A RELIEF! I didn't want the Crows to take him on.
by Rik E Boy » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:13 pm
Psyber wrote:Andy #24 wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Collingwoods' Alan Didak is a Crow.... 98.7665%
Only time will tell...?
Know any more...?
Unlucky mate, there was only 1.2335% chance, but you were wrong
WHAT A RELIEF! I didn't want the Crows to take him on.
by NFC » Tue Nov 20, 2007 12:49 pm
Psyber wrote:Andy #24 wrote:Dog_ger wrote:Collingwoods' Alan Didak is a Crow.... 98.7665%
Only time will tell...?
Know any more...?
Unlucky mate, there was only 1.2335% chance, but you were wrong
WHAT A RELIEF! I didn't want the Crows to take him on.
by Psyber » Tue Nov 20, 2007 6:33 pm
by scoob » Tue Nov 20, 2007 7:27 pm
Psyber wrote:I don't really believe you can build a winning team on drunks, druggies, and crims - except perhaps in WA![And even there it comes unstuck in time..]
by MatteeG » Tue Nov 20, 2007 9:39 pm
Psyber wrote:I don't really believe you can build a winning team on drunks, druggies, and crims
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Psyber » Tue Nov 20, 2007 10:47 pm
scoob wrote:Psyber wrote:I don't really believe you can build a winning team on drunks, druggies, and crims - except perhaps in WA![And even there it comes unstuck in time..]
Pull your head out of the sand... its going on in a lot of clubs...
by stan » Fri Nov 23, 2007 9:22 am
MatteeG wrote:Psyber wrote:I don't really believe you can build a winning team on drunks, druggies, and crims
So thats why the Crows didnt do so well- they are too squeaky clean (). And I thought it was just lack of talent!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |