SA Footy

Booney wrote:

stan wrote:

Dutchy wrote:They never said that was the footage of the incident, simply part of his big night on the town, its probably not even the girl in questions. Looks like it is outside and someone has taken some video on their phone cause they knew who it was.

Thats good point and this wasnt cctv footage either. So there is another set of footage from inside the club.

However this shows him acting like a dickhead, by the looks of things ad her reaction hes gone the ass grab (purely my own speculation on her reaction) here and shes not overly happy.

She's holding her handbag behind her back.

Was he trying to pinch it?

Day 3 of trial by internet.

Spargo wrote:

Booney wrote:

stan wrote:

Dutchy wrote:They never said that was the footage of the incident, simply part of his big night on the town, its probably not even the girl in questions. Looks like it is outside and someone has taken some video on their phone cause they knew who it was.

Thats good point and this wasnt cctv footage either. So there is another set of footage from inside the club.

However this shows him acting like a dickhead, by the looks of things ad her reaction hes gone the ass grab (purely my own speculation on her reaction) here and shes not overly happy.

She's holding her handbag behind her back.

Was he trying to pinch it?

What are you suggesting? He's a thief? You're accusing him of theft?

I'm sure you've got the evidence to back up your claim.

Sidebar, your honour...

Spargo wrote:Sidebar, your honour...

No. Please proceed.

Booney wrote:
What are you suggesting? He's a thief? You're accusing him of theft?

I'm sure you've got the evidence to back up your claim.

He was trying to steal her heart.

Lightning McQueen wrote:

Booney wrote:
What are you suggesting? He's a thief? You're accusing him of theft?

I'm sure you've got the evidence to back up your claim.

He was trying to steal her heart.

From her ar$e?

FOOTAGE OF THE INCIDENT HAS BEEN RELEASED!!!!

OMG!!!!

*opens video* - Footage of an intoxicated SPP on the street. Literally something you would see of thousands of people on Hindley St on a Sunday morning.

**** me. What does that footage actually prove?

Gutter journalism.

valleys07 wrote:FOOTAGE OF THE INCIDENT HAS BEEN RELEASED!!!!

OMG!!!!

*opens video* - Footage of an intoxicated SPP on the street. Literally something you would see of thousands of people on Hindley St on a Sunday morning.

**** me. What does that footage actually prove?

Gutter journalism.

Yep, and the public thrives on it.

I guess Mr Kim's don't have security there, I'm sure the owners would be loving the publicity regardless of the accuracy of any reports.

valleys07 wrote:FOOTAGE OF THE INCIDENT HAS BEEN RELEASED!!!!

OMG!!!!

*opens video* - Footage of an intoxicated SPP on the street. Literally something you would see of thousands of people on Hindley St on a Sunday morning.

**** me. What does that footage actually prove?

Gutter journalism.

Read Dutchy’s comments above.
It’s not THE incident in the footage.

I'm in no way condoning the allegations and I wasn't there to judge, I do get annoyed at being treated like a piece of meat by all the women when I do go out though.

amber_fluid wrote:

valleys07 wrote:FOOTAGE OF THE INCIDENT HAS BEEN RELEASED!!!!

OMG!!!!

*opens video* - Footage of an intoxicated SPP on the street. Literally something you would see of thousands of people on Hindley St on a Sunday morning.

**** me. What does that footage actually prove?

Gutter journalism.

Read Dutchy’s comments above.
It’s not THE incident in the footage.

My point exactly.

If it is nothing related to the incident in question- what is channel 7's agenda behind releasing footage of him pi$$ed in the street?

Because the other part of the story was him breaking curfew and being heavily intoxicated. This backs that up.

MW wrote:Because the other part of the story was him breaking curfew and being heavily intoxicated. This backs that up.

Which he admitted to prior to release of the footage.

So does the public need seedy camera phone footage to vindicate what has already been admitted to by the interested party?

In this era of media? yes

It's trash journalism is what it is. Just like how Channel 7 have messaged everyone that was tagged in photo's on FB from Mr Kim's on Sat night asking them for info.

Just has Today Tonight written all over it...

Don't know why people can't just wait til all the facts are out and pass judgement then. The amount of people going tit-for-tat on this over social media - all the while taking a side in keeping with their footy allegiance - Is just stupid. It affects a young man and young woman's life both of which should transcend football.

valleys07 wrote:FOOTAGE OF THE INCIDENT HAS BEEN RELEASED!!!!

OMG!!!!

*opens video* - Footage of an intoxicated SPP on the street. Literally something you would see of thousands of people on Hindley St on a Sunday morning.

**** me. What does that footage actually prove?

Gutter journalism.

Apparently the original one has been taken down & now just an edit is now showing the worst bit. F*** me, if that's the worst bit then the term mountain out of a molehill comes to mind.

Booney wrote:

stan wrote:

Dutchy wrote:They never said that was the footage of the incident, simply part of his big night on the town, its probably not even the girl in questions. Looks like it is outside and someone has taken some video on their phone cause they knew who it was.

Thats good point and this wasnt cctv footage either. So there is another set of footage from inside the club.

However this shows him acting like a dickhead, by the looks of things ad her reaction hes gone the ass grab (purely my own speculation on her reaction) here and shes not overly happy.

She's holding her handbag behind her back.

Righto look like she was turning away from a bit of graby.

Honestly this doesnt tell us anything. Just CH 7 trying to get all they can from it.