by Booney » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:08 pm
by cracka » Tue Jun 10, 2014 4:47 pm
Booney wrote:Goal less is one thing, having zero impact is another.
by bennymacca » Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:29 pm
Booney wrote:bennymacca wrote:Good post Ron, I agree with all of that. 40-50 I would be happy with
What if he has 8 touches and kicks no goals in 3-5 matches? ( He's done it twice in 5 weeks )
If he has zero impact on the game, Adelaide would most likely lose the game. Not saying you are a one man team ( lucky for you lot! ) but he is a bit of a barometer. So if he has zero impact and Adelaide lose and he does that several times during the year yet kicks 40 goals in the other games, you'd be happy with that?
I wouldn't be.
by JK » Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:42 pm
by whufc » Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:46 pm
JK wrote:Feel dirty sticking up for the Crows, but it's worth remembering they are paying good, not great, money for Betts. So they know he's not elite, and knew what they were getting. I think for all his faults (and they've been accurately mentioned here). he would receive a pass mark from what Ive seen of him/them this season.
by JK » Tue Jun 10, 2014 6:52 pm
by whufc » Wed Jun 11, 2014 8:02 am
JK wrote:I agree with you mate .. He probably would have been a better addition to a side that was a genuine contender
by JK » Wed Jun 11, 2014 9:37 am
whufc wrote:JK wrote:I agree with you mate .. He probably would have been a better addition to a side that was a genuine contender
Yeah but i dont think it would come as a surprise to anyone if the arrogant c**nts at west lakes truly believed they were a genuine premiership threat.
by gossipgirl » Wed Jun 11, 2014 11:01 am
whufc wrote:JK wrote:I agree with you mate .. He probably would have been a better addition to a side that was a genuine contender
Yeah but i dont think it would come as a surprise to anyone if the arrogant c**nts at west lakes truly believed they were a genuine premiership threat.
by cracka » Thu Jun 12, 2014 8:44 am
by Booney » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:01 am
cracka wrote:Looks like Sandersons in trouble. He has the full support of the board.
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:33 am
by JK » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:53 am
bennymacca wrote:Who are even asking the questions? I haven't even contemplated them replacing sando just yet. Seems like pure speculation to me.
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 12, 2014 9:56 am
JK wrote:bennymacca wrote:Who are even asking the questions? I haven't even contemplated them replacing sando just yet. Seems like pure speculation to me.
I think any suggestions of chopping him are jumping the gun at the moment, but questions certainly need to be asked and there would want to be significant improvement between now and the end of next season
by JK » Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:10 am
bennymacca wrote:JK wrote:bennymacca wrote:Who are even asking the questions? I haven't even contemplated them replacing sando just yet. Seems like pure speculation to me.
I think any suggestions of chopping him are jumping the gun at the moment, but questions certainly need to be asked and there would want to be significant improvement between now and the end of next season
Yeah agree with that. The thing that is bugging me at the moment is the inconsistency. At their very best they look like a finals team but then they put in a pathetic performance the next week. Or even the next half of footy like on the weekend.
That says to me it is more about coaching than players but it's hard to know, obviously a combination of both.
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 12, 2014 10:29 am
by JK » Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:17 am
bennymacca wrote:2012 would be the answer to your question. We beat Sydney and Fremantle. This year My expectations are somewhat lower than that. I don't expect them to beat freo in the west, but I do expect the crows to take it up to them like they did in the first half. The thing I don't like is that the blueprint to beat the crows is so obvious. If we can work it out here then it's a problem.
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:26 am
by JK » Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:29 am
bennymacca wrote:It was round 6 and 10. I wasn't trying to debunk your point, I agree with you, that was 2 years ago.
I really think that we are seeing the effects of the tippet debacle, because it means CEY and Brodie Martin are getting games, when they should be two first round picks. The drafting of brad crouch looks like a master stroke now because without him and his brother we would be royally screwed
by bennymacca » Thu Jun 12, 2014 11:32 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |