by valleys07 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:05 pm
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:07 pm
by helicopterking » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:10 pm
by valleys07 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:23 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:provided that youth continues to develop as it has.
sign up Beams and Ryder for 4yrs each
by Red Rocket » Wed Sep 24, 2014 8:48 pm
valleys07 wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:provided that youth continues to develop as it has.
sign up Beams and Ryder for 4yrs each
Well they did say that Brisbane have got approx $250-300k per year more to offer than Port.
Hinkley posed the statement- if his decision is based on finances, then Port are not the club for him. If he makes the decision for football- then we are.
by JK » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:18 pm
by gadj1976 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:22 pm
by JK » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:35 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Brisbane's approach makes more sense than say Carlton getting Thomas. Carlton gave up pick 12 (Carlton's first pick) I think it was for Thomas and paid him a motza (ie, put all our eggs in one basket). Brisbane are saying they need more than 1 player (ie, keep pick 4) but are happy to pay overs for someone with pick 22. Makes sense to me to try and do it.
by Jim05 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:44 pm
JK wrote:I think GWS are a chance but less likely than the other options.
Bris - the lure of family and possible big dollars
Port - the lure of (potential) success
Syd - the lure of either or both $$ and premiership contention
Actually had a message from a mate tonight saying he has it on very good authority he'll re-sign with Essendon, but it's hard to see that happening.
by Q. » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:45 pm
by bennymacca » Wed Sep 24, 2014 9:51 pm
by the joker » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:03 pm
doing a medical from Bali?Booney wrote:Sam Day had a medical at Port Adelaide yesterday.
by CoverKing » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:10 pm
gadj1976 wrote:Brisbane's approach makes more sense than say Carlton getting Thomas. Carlton gave up pick 12 (Carlton's first pick) I think it was for Thomas and paid him a motza (ie, put all our eggs in one basket). Brisbane are saying they need more than 1 player (ie, keep pick 4) but are happy to pay overs for someone with pick 22. Makes sense to me to try and do it.
by gadj1976 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:14 pm
JK wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Brisbane's approach makes more sense than say Carlton getting Thomas. Carlton gave up pick 12 (Carlton's first pick) I think it was for Thomas and paid him a motza (ie, put all our eggs in one basket). Brisbane are saying they need more than 1 player (ie, keep pick 4) but are happy to pay overs for someone with pick 22. Makes sense to me to try and do it.
Yeah hate to say it mate, but Carlton have paid overs on multiple fronts for Daisy when there was such a big query about what levels he'd ever be able to reach with serious injury.
by gadj1976 » Wed Sep 24, 2014 10:15 pm
CoverKing wrote:gadj1976 wrote:Brisbane's approach makes more sense than say Carlton getting Thomas. Carlton gave up pick 12 (Carlton's first pick) I think it was for Thomas and paid him a motza (ie, put all our eggs in one basket). Brisbane are saying they need more than 1 player (ie, keep pick 4) but are happy to pay overs for someone with pick 22. Makes sense to me to try and do it.
Carlton gave up nothing for daisy. They got him via free agency.
Technically the only they gave up is the compensation pick that they would of got for Eddie betts
by Pup » Wed Sep 24, 2014 11:26 pm
by Pup » Thu Sep 25, 2014 8:15 am
by Feenix » Thu Sep 25, 2014 9:03 am
by Pup » Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:03 am
Feenix wrote:The Suns could make a play for Beams, imagine him and Ablett in the midfield. Beams has only said he wants to go back to Queensland not that he wants to get traded to Brisbane, he’s from the Gold Coast too.
by dedja » Thu Sep 25, 2014 10:09 am
heater31 wrote:RustyCage wrote:Three delistings for the PAFC so far
Brent Renouf
Cam Hitchcock
Campbell Heath
Hitchcock back to the Bays?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |