Re: Sydney Swans 2014
![Post Post](./styles/SAFOOTYv2/imageset/icon_post_target.png)
bennymacca wrote:If goodes is fit, having him and buddy running as high half forwards is going to create a ton of problems
chuck in reid too
bennymacca wrote:If goodes is fit, having him and buddy running as high half forwards is going to create a ton of problems
MatteeG wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:Tippett and franklin got through training and are set to line up Friday night
Timed it well with Lake out
bennymacca wrote:Yeah who will they play on? Gibson will take buddy? That leaves spangher for Tippett?
With Tippett in form I like that matchup if I was a swans fan. Remains to be seen how match fit he is though.
I'm gonna tip the swans up there though
woodublieve12 wrote:Tippett and franklin got through training and are set to line up Friday night
Jim05 wrote:Hawks by plenty, Swans struggle at that pathetic ground. Time to bite the bullet and give ANZ the flick
Bum Crack wrote:Not hard to get a kick when you've got Cheney on u most of the night. Most teams in the 8 would have beaten hawks with the players they had missing.
woodublieve12 wrote:Hawks were a bit undermanned but the swans had few underdone
woodublieve12 wrote:bennymacca wrote:If goodes is fit, having him and buddy running as high half forwards is going to create a ton of problems
chuck in reid too
NO-MERCY wrote:Bum Crack wrote:Not hard to get a kick when you've got Cheney on u most of the night. Most teams in the 8 would have beaten hawks with the players they had missing.
I agree with that. the Swans should of won easily, Hawthorn with no Hodge, Mitchell, Lake, Rioli............... & other injuries to good players were unlucky in the end with a very very depleted side.
If your a Swans supporter it nothing to BARR up about!
Rik E Boy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:bennymacca wrote:If goodes is fit, having him and buddy running as high half forwards is going to create a ton of problems
chuck in reid too
Sorry dude but Reid is shit.
regards,
REB
Rik E Boy wrote:NO-MERCY wrote:Bum Crack wrote:Not hard to get a kick when you've got Cheney on u most of the night. Most teams in the 8 would have beaten hawks with the players they had missing.
I agree with that. the Swans should of won easily, Hawthorn with no Hodge, Mitchell, Lake, Rioli............... & other injuries to good players were unlucky in the end with a very very depleted side.
If your a Swans supporter it nothing to BARR up about!
Here's the thing though, Collingwood and Geelong have introduced youth, Hawthorn (and Sydney) topped up over the years with players from other clubs. With everyone on the park you've got a formidable, experienced line up. When injuries occur to key veterans the youth you haven't been developing aren't experienced enough to fill the void. In my view Collingwood and Geelong have done it right.
When was the last time MItchell had two injuries in one season? He's normally Mr 20 games a season every year. Sewell is gone and Hodge's regular representation was a huge benefit for Hawkers last year. Will Lake have the hunger now he's got his medal? Plenty of questions over the Hawks even before this match even though their percentage said they are unbeatable.
Hawthorn just don't have the next generation of players ready but having said that no club can counter injuries that occur during a game but a Rioli hamstring injury is hardly a shock to anyone.
regards,
REB
woodublieve12 wrote:Rik E Boy wrote:woodublieve12 wrote:bennymacca wrote:If goodes is fit, having him and buddy running as high half forwards is going to create a ton of problems
chuck in reid too
Sorry dude but Reid is shit.
regards,
REB
Wasn't last night...