by Dog_ger » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:15 pm
by Psyber » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:44 pm
Maybe you would probably be better off if you had!Rotter wrote:Staggers me how many self righteous pricks there are on this forum. I wish I'd lived a holier than thou existence many of you have though it must be nice to sit in judgement with such surety.
by Rotter » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:47 pm
With all due respect, you're delusionalPsyber wrote:Maybe you would probably be better off if you had!Rotter wrote:Staggers me how many self righteous pricks there are on this forum. I wish I'd lived a holier than thou existence many of you have though it must be nice to sit in judgement with such surety.![]()
Absolutely no one I went to school with, through Uni with, or worked with, has ever done anything like this sort of stuff - driving absolutely pissed and pissing in public.
A few may have sometimes got mildly drunk and driven close to or just over the limit.
This is not normal behaviour, except in a small sub-group of over-indulged and under-matured sport jocks. I admit it seems to be becoming more common, presumably because kids copy these guys, who perhaps shouldn't be role models, but are just because they are in every kid's face in the media and held up as "stars" and made excuses for.
Good on Collingwood for finally making a stand. Hopefully all the other clubs will too.
by Psyber » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:52 pm
Do you mean I imagined the people around me all my life haven't been behaving like this and they really were?Rotter wrote:With all due respect, you're delusional
i.e. This is the percentage drinking any alcohol at all - not the percentage getting totally tanked.Alcohol drinking status 2001 – percentage of population:
Daily 3%
Weekly 39.5%
Less than Weekly 34.6%
by Dirko » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:56 pm
by Hondo » Tue Aug 05, 2008 10:57 pm
Rotter wrote:Staggers me how many self righteous pricks there are on this forum. I wish I'd lived a holier than thou existence many of you have though it must be nice to sit in judgement with such surety.
by Rotter » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:02 pm
Mate in direct contrast to your narrow minded recollections of youth, if what Didak and co have done was the worst any of the people I went through school and Uni had done, they would be sleeping a lot better at night than what they do now. What did you study at Uni - abstinence.Psyber wrote:Do you mean I imagined the people around me all my life haven't been behaving like this and they really were?Rotter wrote:With all due respect, you're delusional
by Rotter » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:06 pm
That's the very point, I'm not on a soap box and frankly I find more interest in watching the likes of you get all roused up over it. Just out of interest how can you tell someone's a self righteuos prick from a 10 word forum post because mate, you're not that clever.hondo71 wrote:Rotter wrote:Staggers me how many self righteous pricks there are on this forum. I wish I'd lived a holier than thou existence many of you have though it must be nice to sit in judgement with such surety.
Like you just did? You can tell someone's a "self righteous prick" from a 10 word forum post![]()
If anybody acted like that they would be similarly judged - AFL player or not. Think about it, its not that hard.
So how about you get off your soap box and tell us what do you think about what the lads did and what do you think about the club's penalty ....
by Psyber » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:11 pm
1. Absolutely never in adulthood. I did once when I was 8 and was caught short in the playground [very discretely and wasn't visible].Rotter wrote: [1]Are you telling me you never pissed behind a tree at "O" week or [2] drove home after one too many because it wasn't far from the pub and you're kidding yourself if you try to split hairs by saying your friends were only [3] "mildly" drunk or there abouts when they drove home as if that makes a difference from being paralytic..
by Hondo » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:12 pm
Rotter wrote:Just out of interest how can you tell someone's a self righteuos prick from a 10 word forum post
by Rotter » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:16 pm
I'm not suggesting for a moment that they not face the consequences of their actions, my points have tried to challenge the very notion that because they play AFL football and earn X amount of $$$, that they are expected to be any more resposible than You and I.SJABC wrote:Rotter, perhaps the players have to abide by a code of conduct in which they are employed ?
I know that if I got pi55ed and drove and lost my license, my code of conduct from my ex workplace
meant that I had to resign as I could not do my job with out a valid drivers license...
Also covered public behaviour in uniform as even though I may not of been working, I represented
the company as I wore there uniform....
Like it or not they represent the Collingwood Footy Club, and if they bring the club into a bad light then
they face the consequences just as I would've for my previous company for doing such.....
by southee » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:18 pm
by Hondo » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:19 pm
Rotter wrote:my points have tried to challenge the very notion that because they play AFL football and earn X amount of $$$, that they are expected to be any more resposible than You and I.
by Dirko » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:21 pm
by Rotter » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:26 pm
This attitude is what I was referring too Hondo71, it's exactly what you're saying they're not being judged for.Mr66 wrote:
But none of us on this forum are getting paid (at least) $150Gs a year to act with a bit of intelligence.
by magpie in the 80's » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:27 pm
by Rotter » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:33 pm
What statements have I made that even remotely condones their behaviour. My first entre in this forum was questioning how "some" on this forum are passing judgement as if they've never transgressed.southee wrote:Rotter, there is no excuse for drink driving.....imagine if the car that they were driving hit one of your family/relatives, would you be saying the statements you are saying??
I think not.
These guys are morons who are put up in a GOD like manner to the public. Ego's out of control who think that are immortal. Great role model for kids hey??
I say good decision by Collingwood.
by Dutchy » Tue Aug 05, 2008 11:47 pm
Rotter wrote:I'm not suggesting for a moment that they not face the consequences of their actions, my points have tried to challenge the very notion that because they play AFL football and earn X amount of $$$, that they are expected to be any more resposible than You and I.SJABC wrote:Rotter, perhaps the players have to abide by a code of conduct in which they are employed ?
I know that if I got pi55ed and drove and lost my license, my code of conduct from my ex workplace
meant that I had to resign as I could not do my job with out a valid drivers license...
Also covered public behaviour in uniform as even though I may not of been working, I represented
the company as I wore there uniform....
Like it or not they represent the Collingwood Footy Club, and if they bring the club into a bad light then
they face the consequences just as I would've for my previous company for doing such.....
by Rotter » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:03 am
Well hopefully those kids learned that there are far better role models to model their life on.Dutchy wrote:Rotter wrote:I'm not suggesting for a moment that they not face the consequences of their actions, my points have tried to challenge the very notion that because they play AFL football and earn X amount of $$$, that they are expected to be any more responsible than You and I.SJABC wrote:Rotter, perhaps the players have to abide by a code of conduct in which they are employed ?
I know that if I got pi55ed and drove and lost my license, my code of conduct from my ex workplace
meant that I had to resign as I could not do my job with out a valid drivers license...
Also covered public behaviour in uniform as even though I may not of been working, I represented
the company as I wore there uniform....
Like it or not they represent the Collingwood Footy Club, and if they bring the club into a bad light then
they face the consequences just as I would've for my previous company for doing such.....
Yes however cause they play football they are in the public eye and have an extra responsibility to behave, consider the thousands of kids with No's 4 and 39 on their backs who look(ed) up to these blokes....
by Rotter » Wed Aug 06, 2008 12:06 am
I'm tipping you get called a wanker in any eventhondo71 wrote:[. If I did what they did I'd cop being called a wanker for it.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |