by Booney » Tue Jun 19, 2007 11:44 am
by Aerie » Tue Jun 19, 2007 12:43 pm
Booney wrote:I for one never find myself surprised,or for that matter dissapointed at the headlines we all read,no different to the rest of society,some good eggs,some stinkers.
by JK » Tue Jun 19, 2007 1:22 pm
Booney wrote:I for one never find myself surprised,or for that matter dissapointed at the headlines we all read,no different to the rest of society,some good eggs,some stinkers.
by Benchwarmer » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:02 pm
by Booney » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:42 pm
Benchwarmer wrote:We all know that increased professionalism has caused this problem.
Before the advent of professionalism around the 1990s, players had to work full-time so they all went to uni or got into trades so that they were educated in the ways of the working world.
Now they enter the system as 17 or 18 year olds and don't go to uni, are far from wise as to society's ideals and standards and as a result we have the perception of "dumb footballers" in all the major football codes.
They have too much time on their hands, some blow their inflated salaries on gambling, booze, etc. and when their careers are over they have trouble "assimilating" back into the mainstream.
Do you blame the players or the system ... personally, I think that the system hasn't been tough enough because they don't ensure that their sport's ambassadors complete their studies or at least learn a trade so that they may have it as a fallback if their careers don't last long.
Too many hope to get a undeserved cushy job in the media ... and bore us senseless with their uneducated warblings!
by heater31 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 2:47 pm
Booney wrote:
Good post.I think the Players Assosciation have in recent years been more active in ensuring the younger players develop off field skills whilst they are still learning the on field trade.
This also reflects badly on the 'system' as the AFLPA are looking after thier own,the AFL having little (publicised anyway) impact.
by Sojourner » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:01 pm
by Benchwarmer » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:14 pm
by am Bays » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:15 pm
by Mr66 » Wed Jun 20, 2007 8:41 pm
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:When i first saw this thread, I thought it was a Port supporter admitting it is time to lower his expectation on where Port is going to finish...![]()
by Psyber » Wed Jun 20, 2007 11:23 pm
by Hondo » Thu Jun 21, 2007 9:10 am
Mr66 wrote:1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:When i first saw this thread, I thought it was a Port supporter admitting it is time to lower his expectation on where Port is going to finish...![]()
LOL. What makes it doubly funny is that it applies to SANFL & AFL.![]()
Benchy's post was spot on.
We are copying the US recruiting system and just have a look at the
immature drop-kicks they are turning out, eg. Terrell Owens,Randy Moss,Ron Artest etc...
by JK » Thu Jun 21, 2007 10:29 am
Benchwarmer wrote:We all know that increased professionalism has caused this problem.
Before the advent of professionalism around the 1990s, players had to work full-time so they all went to uni or got into trades so that they were educated in the ways of the working world.
Now they enter the system as 17 or 18 year olds and don't go to uni, are far from wise as to society's ideals and standards and as a result we have the perception of "dumb footballers" in all the major football codes.
They have too much time on their hands, some blow their inflated salaries on gambling, booze, etc. and when their careers are over they have trouble "assimilating" back into the mainstream.
Do you blame the players or the system ... personally, I think that the system hasn't been tough enough because they don't ensure that their sport's ambassadors complete their studies or at least learn a trade so that they may have it as a fallback if their careers don't last long.
Too many hope to get a undeserved cushy job in the media ... and bore us senseless with their uneducated warblings!
by Benchwarmer » Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:03 am
by Booney » Thu Jun 21, 2007 11:39 am
by doggies4eva » Fri Jun 22, 2007 6:19 pm
by Psyber » Fri Jun 22, 2007 10:26 pm
doggies4eva wrote:Interesting topic. Just because a bloke has a job as a footy player he is then supposed to be a role model. Why? Are we the public so stupid that if high profile players act stupidly in public we will all follow suit?
I guess it comes down to the pressure that sponsors put on clubs when they sign up for the big dollars. They are paying for image not on-field performance.
by Magpiespower » Sat Jun 23, 2007 1:23 pm
by Psyber » Sat Jun 23, 2007 2:11 pm
Magpiespower wrote:The ongoing Sonny Bill soapie is a joke.
He took a slash in the street - who hasn't?
He had a crack at a skank glamour in a pub toilet - who wouldnt?
Nothing's gonna change the fact that these are young dumb blokes doing young dumb things.
Like we all did.
And some of us still do...
by Strawb » Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:22 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |