by Newman » Mon May 19, 2008 5:56 pm
by Booney » Mon May 19, 2008 6:11 pm
by brod » Mon May 19, 2008 6:17 pm
by hearts on fire » Mon May 19, 2008 6:26 pm
by Newman » Mon May 19, 2008 6:29 pm
by hearts on fire » Mon May 19, 2008 6:31 pm
Newman wrote:No mistake mate has been offered 4 weeks 3 with an early plea.
by redden whites » Mon May 19, 2008 7:29 pm
hearts on fire wrote:Surely there is some mistake? Burgoyne hardly touched Sam Mitchell..........................![]()
by hearts on fire » Mon May 19, 2008 7:58 pm
redden whites wrote:hearts on fire wrote:Surely there is some mistake? Burgoyne hardly touched Sam Mitchell..........................![]()
Other than the shoulder to the head and the stretcher that was required.
by JK » Tue May 20, 2008 2:19 pm
by redden whites » Tue May 20, 2008 4:24 pm
hearts on fire wrote:redden whites wrote:hearts on fire wrote:Surely there is some mistake? Burgoyne hardly touched Sam Mitchell..........................![]()
Other than the shoulder to the head and the stretcher that was required.
pfffft, the contact was very minimal and was not worthy of a three match suspension. A free kick yes but a suspension NO!
by norm11 » Tue May 20, 2008 4:36 pm
by hearts on fire » Tue May 20, 2008 4:38 pm
redden whites wrote:hearts on fire wrote:redden whites wrote:hearts on fire wrote:Surely there is some mistake? Burgoyne hardly touched Sam Mitchell..........................![]()
Other than the shoulder to the head and the stretcher that was required.
pfffft, the contact was very minimal and was not worthy of a three match suspension. A free kick yes but a suspension NO!
A man is knocked out cold and you believe it is "very minimal " and he was "hardly touched"...strange very strange.It had to be looked at surely as he actually had not yet taken the ball and was hit high.....I assume you think the Ben McGlynn incident with Cornes was laughable and should be thrown out too(personally I don't), has he actually had the ball and then got straight up without being knocked out![]()
by redden whites » Tue May 20, 2008 4:39 pm
norm11 wrote:He came back on the ground he could not have hit him that hard
by redden whites » Tue May 20, 2008 4:41 pm
hearts on fire wrote:exactly what Norm said, how long was he off for? 20 minutes? it wasn't very hard at all!
by norm11 » Tue May 20, 2008 4:43 pm
Accidental contact . IT does happen.redden whites wrote:hearts on fire wrote:exactly what Norm said, how long was he off for? 20 minutes? it wasn't very hard at all!
by redden whites » Tue May 20, 2008 4:48 pm
norm11 wrote:Accidental contact . IT does happen.redden whites wrote:hearts on fire wrote:exactly what Norm said, how long was he off for? 20 minutes? it wasn't very hard at all!
by hearts on fire » Tue May 20, 2008 4:49 pm
by norm11 » Tue May 20, 2008 4:51 pm
redden whites wrote:norm11 wrote:Accidental contact . IT does happen.redden whites wrote:hearts on fire wrote:exactly what Norm said, how long was he off for? 20 minutes? it wasn't very hard at all!
It does not have to be deliberate to at least face the tribunal .Ask Peter Everitt and Stephen Powell or according to Dogs fans Chris grant
by redden whites » Tue May 20, 2008 4:52 pm
hearts on fire wrote:It was worthy to get a look at but no way was it worthy of a suspension!
by SCD » Tue May 20, 2008 5:21 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |