by overloaded » Mon May 03, 2010 7:04 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by Felch » Mon May 03, 2010 7:07 pm
by gadj1976 » Mon May 03, 2010 7:07 pm
by overloaded » Mon May 03, 2010 7:16 pm
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....
I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
by devilsadvocate » Tue May 04, 2010 6:24 pm
by fish » Tue May 04, 2010 7:55 pm
by jackpot jim » Wed May 05, 2010 2:17 am
Felch wrote:As much as i would love to stick the boots in here, its a storm in a teacup. Happened 14 months ago, involves a $20 bet placed on a pre-season game that Port wasnt involved in, by a punters club that Matty Primus may or may not have been part of.
Load of cr@p, media beat up.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed May 05, 2010 6:10 am
by Footy Smart » Wed May 05, 2010 11:11 am
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Matty Primus will be sanctioned as the lap-top used to place the bet was in his name
im disappointed that they havent mentioned whether it was a winner or not
by nuggety goodness » Wed May 05, 2010 11:40 am
Footy Smart wrote:mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Matty Primus will be sanctioned as the lap-top used to place the bet was in his name
im disappointed that they havent mentioned whether it was a winner or not
Thats the only important and interesting thing about this topic... the suspence over the result of the ticket!
whats a joke of a stroy, who cares it was a 20 buck bet
by Psyber » Wed May 05, 2010 11:45 am
by Footy Smart » Wed May 05, 2010 1:58 pm
Psyber wrote:It really does seem rather trivial.
I can't see the problem about players having the odd bet on games not involving their own team.
There would be a need to watch for situations, indirectly involving their own team, that might create temptation to throw games to affect another team's ladder position.
by mighty_tiger_79 » Wed May 05, 2010 5:18 pm
Footy Smart wrote:Psyber wrote:It really does seem rather trivial.
I can't see the problem about players having the odd bet on games not involving their own team.
There would be a need to watch for situations, indirectly involving their own team, that might create temptation to throw games to affect another team's ladder position.
I guess the issue is them knowing a mate from an opposition isnt playing before hand getting fixed odds etc etc
by X Runna » Wed May 05, 2010 6:06 pm
by Psyber » Wed May 05, 2010 7:20 pm
by The Dark Knight » Wed May 05, 2010 8:24 pm
mighty_tiger_79 wrote:Matty Primus will be sanctioned as the lap-top used to place the bet was in his name
im disappointed that they havent mentioned whether it was a winner or not
by the big bang » Wed May 05, 2010 11:54 pm
devilsadvocate wrote:I think the investigation should start with the 2008 granny.
Could some players had had line bets on the Cats -60.5?
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |