by Thiele » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:24 pm
by GWW » Tue Aug 04, 2009 8:28 pm
NFC wrote:PORT Adelaide’s Matt Thomas and Fremantle’s Hayden Ballantyne have both been offered one-match suspensions after the match review panel's assessment of round 18.
Thomas was charged for rough conduct against Hawthorn’s Xavier Ellis.
Thomas’ poor record means his one-game sanction cannot be reduced with an early plea.
His incident was assessed as negligent conduct, medium impact and body contact, drawing four activation points and a level one offence. Thomas’s existing bad record of three matches suspended within the last three years increased the penalty by 30 per cent to 162.50 points.
Well deserved.
by Macca19 » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:09 pm
GWW wrote:NFC wrote:PORT Adelaide’s Matt Thomas and Fremantle’s Hayden Ballantyne have both been offered one-match suspensions after the match review panel's assessment of round 18.
Thomas was charged for rough conduct against Hawthorn’s Xavier Ellis.
Thomas’ poor record means his one-game sanction cannot be reduced with an early plea.
His incident was assessed as negligent conduct, medium impact and body contact, drawing four activation points and a level one offence. Thomas’s existing bad record of three matches suspended within the last three years increased the penalty by 30 per cent to 162.50 points.
Well deserved.
Thomas cleared
by jackpot jim » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:15 pm
NFC wrote:PORT Adelaide’s Matt Thomas and Fremantle’s Hayden Ballantyne have both been offered one-match suspensions after the match review panel's assessment of round 18.
Thomas was charged for rough conduct against Hawthorn’s Xavier Ellis.
Thomas’ poor record means his one-game sanction cannot be reduced with an early plea.
His incident was assessed as negligent conduct, medium impact and body contact, drawing four activation points and a level one offence. Thomas’s existing bad record of three matches suspended within the last three years increased the penalty by 30 per cent to 162.50 points.
Well deserved.
by auto » Tue Aug 04, 2009 9:48 pm
by Booney » Wed Aug 05, 2009 8:48 am
by Ruben Carter » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:14 am
NFC wrote:Absolute dirty scum bag of a player. Has no skills, is in the competition because of his thuggery. The sooner someone takes him out the better.
by Booney » Wed Aug 05, 2009 10:17 am
by catchit » Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:14 pm
Booney wrote:Must be a good player, not even the tribunal could "take him out".....
by Magpiespower » Wed Aug 05, 2009 1:26 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |