by Shirtfront » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:16 pm
by Hondo » Tue Nov 18, 2008 4:48 pm
by Footy Smart » Wed Nov 19, 2008 2:29 pm
by mypaddock » Thu Nov 20, 2008 8:14 am
hondo71 wrote:Plus we are hoping for bigger things from Tippett, Moran and Sellar
Plus natural improvement from 2-3 year players in Knights, Douglas, Porplyzia, VB, Maric, Griffin, Jacky, Mackay, Vince
Dangerfield, Kite, Petrenko and Walker are the ones I am most excited about.
If everyone lives up to the hype/potential we'll be premiers! But we know that not all of them will .... my big hope season is 2010 when hopefully more of these lads hit some reasonable pay-dirt, than don't.
by Hondo » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:09 am
mypaddock wrote:Besides Porplyzia nobody in that 2-3 yr players group will be anything more than a list filler. What the Crows need are matchwinners and from what I can see Porps and Walker are the only ones who fit that bill. Petrenko and Dangerfield may fall into this category in the yrs to come.
Vince, Mackay VB etc are all reasonable AFL footballers but they aren't going to win you premierships.
by mypaddock » Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:24 am
hondo71 wrote:mypaddock wrote:Besides Porplyzia nobody in that 2-3 yr players group will be anything more than a list filler. What the Crows need are matchwinners and from what I can see Porps and Walker are the only ones who fit that bill. Petrenko and Dangerfield may fall into this category in the yrs to come.
Vince, Mackay VB etc are all reasonable AFL footballers but they aren't going to win you premierships.
That's a stupid comment
You could make the same comment about Sewell, Guerra, Gilham and a few other Hawks who are all now premiership players. You could almost say it about the entire Sydney 2005 premiership side. And no disrespect is intended to any of those guys BTW.
You don't need 15 "match-winners", you need maybe 4-5. Then equally importantly, you need 10-15 good AFL players who do their job week in, week out. If 2 of my list are matchwinners and the rest are the good, backbone players then we will be in the same boat as most other sides. Crows 97-98 had exactly that ratio of super-stars to good players.
You contradict yourself anyway - one sentence their "list fillers" the next they are "reasonable AFL footballers".
by Psyber » Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:46 pm
by Booney » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:39 pm
by catchisthecry » Fri Nov 21, 2008 7:09 pm
by stan » Tue Dec 02, 2008 1:22 pm
catchisthecry wrote:Walker should start from Rd. 1. Hentschel needs a few bags in SANFL.
Walker proved himself in SANFL finals.
I like the look of Otten too...
by FD88 » Wed Dec 03, 2008 2:49 am
by Rik E Boy » Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:26 pm
Booney wrote:Lets not get all boring,or Neil Craig about this.. :wink:
by redden whites » Fri Dec 05, 2008 8:53 pm
Oh for the love of god you cant be seriousFD88 wrote:Vince has matchwinning potential.
by NFC » Sun Dec 07, 2008 12:35 am
redden whites wrote:Oh for the love of god you cant be seriousFD88 wrote:Vince has matchwinning potential.
by Footy Smart » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:04 am
redden whites wrote:Oh for the love of god you cant be seriousFD88 wrote:Vince has matchwinning potential.
by catchisthecry » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:21 am
stan wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Walker should start from Rd. 1. Hentschel needs a few bags in SANFL.
Walker proved himself in SANFL finals.
I like the look of Otten too...
Walker proved that when the ball hit the deck he could turn his slower sanfl level defenders inside out and kick a few. He still needs some bulk and a few more senior sanfl games under his belt. In my opinon at this stage he would be beaten by good AFL defenders. So let the kid develop his body first before you throw him to the lions.
by Footy Smart » Mon Dec 08, 2008 9:36 am
catchisthecry wrote:stan wrote:catchisthecry wrote:Walker should start from Rd. 1. Hentschel needs a few bags in SANFL.
Walker proved himself in SANFL finals.
I like the look of Otten too...
Walker proved that when the ball hit the deck he could turn his slower sanfl level defenders inside out and kick a few. He still needs some bulk and a few more senior sanfl games under his belt. In my opinon at this stage he would be beaten by good AFL defenders. So let the kid develop his body first before you throw him to the lions.
Ok.......... or do what Essendon did with a talented, yet not fully developed, young bloke called M. Lloyd.
Play him!!!! Kicked 70 goals as a 19 year old.
Walker has as much talent IMO.
by FD88 » Mon Dec 08, 2008 3:10 pm
Footy Smart wrote:redden whites wrote:Oh for the love of god you cant be seriousFD88 wrote:Vince has matchwinning potential.
He won the game for the crows in a tightly contested showdown if i remember rightly he was a star...... BOG by a country mile and the difference between the 2 teams
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |