by Rik E Boy » Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:13 pm
by Dirko » Mon Sep 15, 2008 1:21 pm
by Booney » Mon Sep 15, 2008 2:55 pm
by smac » Mon Sep 15, 2008 3:12 pm
Booney wrote:One guy,pushing two guys heads up three guys bums............who cares?
by Hondo » Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:09 pm
by Psyber » Mon Sep 15, 2008 4:41 pm
I'll be interested in Wedgie's view of that one, but I assume the AFL administration at the time saw neither of them as real Melbourne teams and therefore didn't want them around. They've sort of adopted Geelong now, but I bet the media will still favour whoever opposes Geelong in the GF this year since it will be a "true" Melbourne team.hondo71 wrote:..So at this point I'll cue Wedgie for discussion about how the 4th placed Crows got to play at home v 2nd ranked Geelong in week 2 of the 1997 finals
by Pag » Tue Sep 16, 2008 1:52 pm
Saw that, what a joke. Surely there's need to be a structure in place so teams know their path through the finals before they start. NRL's is horrible and unfair to the top 4, espcially if they lose the first week. For Melbourne to finish top and only get one home final is complete crap. Not that I care this year, as my Cowboys weren't exactly close...Rik E Boy wrote:It has been a dud finals series so far to some extent but at least it is an equitable one. Have a Captain Cook at the NRL....
8th ranked NZ Warriors defeated 1st ranked Melbourne Storm and then gets a home semi final against the 4th ranked Sydney Roosters.
If the Storm had won the 4th ranked Sydney Roosters (who lost) would have got a home final against 3rd ranked Cronulla Sharks.
5th ranked Brisbane Broncos get a home final against 1st ranked Melbourne Storm!
Honestly, what a joke.
regards,
REB
by MatteeG » Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:40 pm
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by McAlmanac » Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:53 pm
hondo71 wrote:So at this point I'll cue Wedgie for discussion about how the 4th placed Crows got to play at home v 2nd ranked Geelong in week 2 of the 1997 finals
by McAlmanac » Tue Sep 16, 2008 7:56 pm
Psyber wrote:.... but I bet the media will still favour whoever opposes Geelong in the GF this year since it will be a "true" Melbourne team.
by Strawb » Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:01 pm
McAlmanac wrote:hondo71 wrote:So at this point I'll cue Wedgie for discussion about how the 4th placed Crows got to play at home v 2nd ranked Geelong in week 2 of the 1997 finals
Don't mention Leigh Colbert's unpaid mark....![]()
by McAlmanac » Tue Sep 16, 2008 8:09 pm
Strawb07 wrote:Geelong got screwed it is as simple as that. North Melbourne at night well what a top idea that was.
by Psyber » Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:15 pm
Yep the Saints and the Bullies are the "Melbourne" teams this year. Hawthorn is a bit too eastern suburbs to be the most popular.McAlmanac wrote:Psyber wrote:.... but I bet the media will still favour whoever opposes Geelong in the GF this year since it will be a "true" Melbourne team.
How about that Bulldog bandwagon before the game against Sydney? They may as well have had Herograms....
by cripple » Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:36 pm
by Hondo » Tue Sep 16, 2008 9:46 pm
cripple wrote:Its the exact same final 8 system the afl used to have, until the crows won two flags under it and some people got a bit annoyed.
by McAlmanac » Tue Sep 16, 2008 10:30 pm
by MatteeG » Wed Sep 17, 2008 12:37 am
McAlmanac wrote:Fair point, but please don't count grand finals as "interstate finals". Ticketing arrangements and the modern football calendar combine to ensure neither side has any home ground advantage on the last day in September.
helicopterking wrote:Flaggies will choke. Always have.
by Benchwarmer » Wed Sep 17, 2008 1:13 am
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |