by Psyber » Wed Jul 30, 2008 3:44 pm
by Booney » Wed Jul 30, 2008 7:36 pm
by spell_check » Wed Jul 30, 2008 8:44 pm
by RustyCage » Wed Jul 30, 2008 10:55 pm
Booney wrote:From my knowledge and experience:
1: If the Power have 30,000 members,and the Magpies have 4000(both around the mark give or take a few hundred),I would think 3-3500 of the Magpie members would be Power members also.
2:If the Magpies have (lets loosly term) 15-20,000 "supporters" (yes,I know,nowhere near that many go to Magpie games,but this is {IMO} the amount of Adelaidiens who would say the 'Magpies' when asked who they follow ) then I would suggest of those 15-20,000 maybe,and I say maybe 13-18,000 of those now also "support" the Power.
3:Not really (Spelly can provide 97 Magpie memberships and 08,cant you Spelly?).From memory,since 97 the Magpie membership has been one of the top few in the leauge,now,as numbers go this may have dropped but as far as %age of the SANFL Mermbership base goes it would be a similar figure.
Keep in my my learned friend,this is only based on the knowledge I hold of both the Power and Magpie membership/supporter bases and in no can be used to provide statistics to Big Brother.....
by Psyber » Thu Jul 31, 2008 11:08 am
by Rik E Boy » Thu Jul 31, 2008 12:17 pm
Booney wrote:From my knowledge and experience:
1: If the Power have 30,000 members,and the Magpies have 4000(both around the mark give or take a few hundred),I would think 3-3500 of the Magpie members would be Power members also.
2:If the Magpies have (lets loosly term) 15-20,000 "supporters" (yes,I know,nowhere near that many go to Magpie games,but this is {IMO} the amount of Adelaidiens who would say the 'Magpies' when asked who they follow ) then I would suggest of those 15-20,000 maybe,and I say maybe 13-18,000 of those now also "support" the Power.
3:Not really (Spelly can provide 97 Magpie memberships and 08,cant you Spelly?).From memory,since 97 the Magpie membership has been one of the top few in the league,now,as numbers go this may have dropped but as far as %age of the SANFL Mermbership base goes it would be a similar figure.
Keep in mind my learned friend,this is only based on the knowledge I hold of both the Power and Magpie membership/supporter bases and in no way can be used to provide statistics to Big Brother.....
by Booney » Thu Jul 31, 2008 7:33 pm
Psyber wrote:Thanks guys. I was curious about the effect of a club based AFL licence on the original club, in contrast with the effect of the Crows as a composite side.
I had assumed most PAM supporters would also support the Power, but wondered how many left the old club behind.
by Sojourner » Sun Aug 03, 2008 10:13 pm
Psyber wrote:I had assumed most PAM supporters would also support the Power, but wondered how many left the old club behind.
by GWW » Sun Aug 03, 2008 11:44 pm
by Psyber » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:07 pm
by Dogwatcher » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:13 pm
Rik E Boy wrote: What about literacy rates, life expenctancy and rates of incarceration? From my knowledge and experience it would be LOW, SHORT and HIGH. More importantly, will Prime Minister Rudd come out and apologise for the Bogan Generation and do something about bridging the gap?![]()
regards,
REB
by Dirko » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:16 pm
GWW wrote:Yeah its amazing how Port's AFL following has developed, with quite a few traditional Port (SANFL) supporters following the Crows or another AFL club, and supporters of some of Port's rival clubs, such as Norwood, and Sturt in particular, following the PAFC in the AFL. I guess the amount of Sturt based players on Port's squad over the last 5 or so years may have contributed to that.
by Dogwatcher » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:51 pm
by Dirko » Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:53 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Just like Fulham in the EPL
by Rik E Boy » Mon Aug 04, 2008 4:43 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:
Looking in the mirror at Geelong supporters are you? And yes, I'm aware that I'm a Collingwood supporter.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |