Whilst following footy in the 80's and 90's it was easy to list numerous champion rovers.....rovers in the true sense - pacey, diminutive, in and under players who would always be at the bottom of packs dishing the ball out.....and who would be equally at home resting in the forward pocket and could be relied upon to "crumb" 2 or so goals a game. I'm thinking of players such as Platten, Hodgeman, McGuiness, Naley, Nathan Burke, Weightmann, Bews, Royal, Barry Mitchell, Tony Shaw (probably not so pacey though) etc etc. All rovers in the true sense. Also Liber, although hes not really a favourite with anyone who isn't a Bulldogs supporter. Back in the 70's there was Barry Cable, Leigh Matthews, and i'm sure a few others who i'm not old enough to remember.
How do todays rovers stack up? There are some good ones? Kerr from the Eagles, Brent Harvey (inconsistent), Peter Bell. These are the only real rovers in the true sense i can think of who play today (probably are more i haven't thought of though). Dont get me wrong, there are a lot of good/great players who from time to time play as a rover today - Simon Black, Akermanis, Kane Cornes, Simon Goodwin, sometimes McLeod........but i would say these players are more a traditional centreman/ruck rover type than a rover.
What do other people reckon? Am i being too harsh on today's crop of rovers? Are there any factors in today's footy that have counted against the development of champion rovers, as we've seen in the past? Or am i just simply wrong in my assessment??