by Hondo » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:32 pm
NFC wrote:Oh trust me, if we got pick 97 for him I would've been happy.
by sydney-dog » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:35 pm
by heater31 » Fri Oct 12, 2007 6:43 pm
by stan » Fri Oct 12, 2007 7:43 pm
heater31 wrote:NFC I have had enough of your negativity this week you have shown your true colours of those negative crows supporter types. You blast the club for not acting in previous years and now they do and you still give them a serve. jeez you are hard* man to please.
now back on topic, I am reasonably pleased with the crows activity this week, they have obviously looked at Moran for a long time and have some plans for him in the back half. Symes replaces the loss of Mattner who got an offer from the swans he couldn't refuse
by Dutchy » Fri Oct 12, 2007 8:54 pm
by brod » Fri Oct 12, 2007 9:48 pm
by Dutchy » Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:20 pm
by Pup » Sat Oct 13, 2007 12:08 am
Dutchy wrote:Dont know anything about Davies and Power could be good or s***t....Im not happy about losing Moran though, he has the X factor that could develop into anything....
I dare say cause the draft aint that strong this year that is why there have been more trades
by Dirko » Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:10 am
sydney-dog wrote:On the Hadley trade to Carlton
the Lions are very pissed off
they stuck by Hadley during his two knee recon's, in return Hadley walks out on the club.......
the lions are not happy with this trade at all
by the joker » Sat Oct 13, 2007 10:14 am
after what happened to Josh kennedy i think its good that players can also F#k over the clubs. they can make players trade even when they dont want to its like a meat market so players should be aloud to walk out without clubs being pissed offsydney-dog wrote:On the Hadley trade to Carlton
the Lions are very pissed off
they stuck by Hadley during his two knee recon's, in return Hadley walks out on the club.......
the lions are not happy with this trade at all
by Blue Boy » Sat Oct 13, 2007 6:48 pm
sydney-dog wrote:Blue Boy
Matt Rendell I believe
by sydney-dog » Sat Oct 13, 2007 7:19 pm
by ORDoubleBlues » Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:10 pm
NFC wrote:ORDoubleBlues wrote:Can understand people's frustrations but when you look at it in the context of Hudson was a pick in the 60's himself and may not get back to the level he was at before the knee injury, perhaps it ain't so bad, especially given that everyone says the Crows must get younger and it looks like they are going to have an extra pick or two in the draft.
Umm did you skip this entire season?
by ORDoubleBlues » Sat Oct 13, 2007 8:11 pm
BPBRB wrote:
LOL - ORD should change his user name
by CUTTERMAN » Tue Oct 16, 2007 9:48 am
sydney-dog wrote:bottom line, I still believe the trade week process still requires some fine tuning and the Jay Schulz circumstance is a good example
Jay Schulz agreed to terms with Port Adelaide, only to have his move blocked because of bickering over draft picks.
The Power assumed the trade would be straightforward, with Schulz joining them in exchange for their second-round pick, No. 28.
But the Tigers wanted to also swap pick No. 18 for Port's No. 16 as part of the deal, the Power would not agree, now Schulz must now serve out the final year of his contract at Punt Rd.
swap pick No. 18 for Port's No. 16, Richmond, this is a disgrace, I feel for Schulz
by Blue Boy » Tue Oct 16, 2007 10:26 am
CUTTERMAN wrote:sydney-dog wrote:bottom line, I still believe the trade week process still requires some fine tuning and the Jay Schulz circumstance is a good example
Jay Schulz agreed to terms with Port Adelaide, only to have his move blocked because of bickering over draft picks.
The Power assumed the trade would be straightforward, with Schulz joining them in exchange for their second-round pick, No. 28.
But the Tigers wanted to also swap pick No. 18 for Port's No. 16 as part of the deal, the Power would not agree, now Schulz must now serve out the final year of his contract at Punt Rd.
swap pick No. 18 for Port's No. 16, Richmond, this is a disgrace, I feel for Schulz
I get the impression that Richmond are pretty hard to deal with in trades, I think Adelaide has been stuffed around a few times also
by NFC » Tue Oct 16, 2007 12:26 pm
Blue Boy wrote:CUTTERMAN wrote:sydney-dog wrote:bottom line, I still believe the trade week process still requires some fine tuning and the Jay Schulz circumstance is a good example
Jay Schulz agreed to terms with Port Adelaide, only to have his move blocked because of bickering over draft picks.
The Power assumed the trade would be straightforward, with Schulz joining them in exchange for their second-round pick, No. 28.
But the Tigers wanted to also swap pick No. 18 for Port's No. 16 as part of the deal, the Power would not agree, now Schulz must now serve out the final year of his contract at Punt Rd.
swap pick No. 18 for Port's No. 16, Richmond, this is a disgrace, I feel for Schulz
I get the impression that Richmond are pretty hard to deal with in trades, I think Adelaide has been stuffed around a few times also
About 5 years ago Ben Holland was signed sealed and delivered to the crows - then he ends up @ Melbourne !!!
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |