Should we change the Finals format?
Are too many sides getting the chance to play finals?
Personally, I reckon that the Final Five was and is the best system ... except the AFL would say that it brings in less moolah than the Eight does.
by Benchwarmer » Mon Sep 24, 2007 11:53 am
by BenchedEagle » Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:04 pm
by Hondo » Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:39 pm
by heater31 » Mon Sep 24, 2007 12:48 pm
hondo71 wrote:
I also think that not enough credit is given to the minor premier - there should be some trophy or recognition for it I reckon. Its a great achievement over 22 rounds but we focus mostly on the finals when 1 off day can de-rail your whole season.
by FlyingHigh » Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:02 pm
by Hondo » Mon Sep 24, 2007 1:48 pm
heater31 wrote:hondo71 wrote:
I also think that not enough credit is given to the minor premier - there should be some trophy or recognition for it I reckon. Its a great achievement over 22 rounds but we focus mostly on the finals when 1 off day can de-rail your whole season.
There is one
Its called the McClelland Trophy and used to be awarded to the best performed club throughout the grades in the VFL until 1991 when the u/19 was removed from the league when it went to the minor premier
by Westsider » Mon Sep 24, 2007 2:53 pm
hondo71 wrote: Say Geelong lose 10 players to a virus and lose the GF then their great minor round form gets forgotten and downgraded
by BenchedEagle » Mon Sep 24, 2007 3:20 pm
by Mr66 » Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:17 pm
by McAlmanac » Tue Sep 25, 2007 8:53 pm
lizbeff eaglez wrote:This is the best system in my mind. Top 2 deserve the double home ground advantage. 7-8th have their fair chance to get through. Does not need to be changed at all.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |