Pick 64 vs pick 71

Talk on the national game

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby overloaded » Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:26 pm

wal65 wrote:If Westoff was on the crows list, he would probably still be playing for Centrals.

That is why we are 12th and Port are 3rd
therealROSSCO wrote:Now listen to this loud and clear.....

I have not been approached to coach at the WFC this year, next year or any year. I have not approached the WFC to coach this year, next year or any year. This is an unconditional statement.
overloaded
2009 Punting Comp Winner
 
 
Posts: 6909
Joined: Fri May 25, 2007 10:48 am
Location: far queue
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Blue Boy » Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:40 pm

wal65 wrote:If Westoff was on the crows list, he would probably still be playing for Centrals.


Ouch that hurt - yet so true !!!
It is what it is !!!
User avatar
Blue Boy
Veteran
 
 
Posts: 3625
Joined: Mon Jan 09, 2006 3:44 pm
Location: Any where between here and there
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 1 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby stan » Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:26 pm

Blue Boy wrote:
wal65 wrote:If Westoff was on the crows list, he would probably still be playing for Centrals.


Ouch that hurt - yet so true !!!


And that is the problem thats its true. Tell me guys about the young lad from the bays...
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15522
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1318 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Booney » Thu Aug 02, 2007 6:41 pm

I'll take number 71 thanks Andrew.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61674
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8204 times
Been liked: 11937 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Hondo » Sat Aug 04, 2007 8:49 am

On the subject of hits-and-misses in drafts I, have a look at the 2000 top 20 draft picks - the year that the Saints had the first 2 draft picks (and 7 years later still haven't capitalised on it :wink:)

National Draft
Round Pick Player Recruited from Club
Priority 1 Nick Riewoldt Murray Bushrangers St Kilda
1 2 Justin Koschitzke Southport Sharks St Kilda
1 3 Alan Didak Port Adelaide Magpies Collingwood
1 4 Luke Livingston Bendigo Pioneers Carlton
1 5 Andrew McDougall Perth Football Club West Coast
1 6 Dylan Smith Sandringham Dragons Kangaroos
1 7 Laurence Angwin Dandenong Stingrays Adelaide
1 8 Daniel Motlop North Adelaide Roosters Kangaroos
1 9 Kayne Pettifer Murray Bushrangers Richmond
1 10 Jordan McMahon Glenelg Western Bulldogs
1 11 Trent Sporn North Adelaide Roosters Carlton
1 12 Shaun Burgoyne Port Adelaide Magpies Port Adelaide
1 13 Ashley McGrath South Fremantle Football Club Brisbane Lions
1 14 Daniel Harris Bendigo Bombers Kangaroos
1 15 Simon Wiggins Tasmania Devils Football Club Carlton
1 16 Scott Thompson Port Adelaide Magpies Melbourne
1 17 James Davies Xavier College Essendon
2 18 Daniel Kerr East Fremantle Football Club West Coast Eagles
2 (F/S) 19 Jason Cloke Eastern U18 Collingwood
2 20 Kane Cornes Glenelg Football Club Port Adelaide

How well did Port do in securing 2 future premiership players and All-Australians and Daniel Kerr got passed over by every club once.

Laurence Angwin :shock:

The Kangaroos must have done some trading to have 3 first round picks?

Anyway, just for interests sake .....
In between signatures .....
User avatar
Hondo
Coach
 
 
Posts: 7927
Joined: Fri Feb 16, 2007 9:19 pm
Location: Glandore, Adelaide
Has liked: 70 times
Been liked: 32 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby McAlmanac » Sat Aug 04, 2007 6:21 pm

The Saints got it right. Riewoldt is a star and who could have predicted the litany of misfortune to befall Koschitzke? Key position players is what it's all about in the top 5 - a big cheerio to Richmond recruiters.

Case in point - Daniel Kerr. The Eagles picked Andrew McDougall first. Nobody's slagging them.
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Wedgie » Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:18 pm

Pick64 v Pick71?

1 nil Pick64s way at the moment despite Pick64 playing in the underdog team.
Armchair expert wrote:Such a great club are Geelong
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby sydney-dog » Sat Aug 04, 2007 11:26 pm

I am not going to compare both players, I think that is unfair

but what I will say, I am happy with the way Gill is attacking his footy and if he can work hard on his disposal their is no reason why he can't play 100 games for the AFC

Westoff, great start to his career, but let's not get too carry away, he will start to draw more attention, but the biggest concern is his light frame, if he is unable to gain considerable size, he may struggle to sustain performances at this level, still a long road for the kid
sydney-dog
League - Top 5
 
Posts: 3351
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2006 10:53 pm
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby McAlmanac » Sun Aug 05, 2007 11:34 pm

sydney-dog wrote:but what I will say, I am happy with the way Gill is attacking his footy and if he can work hard on his disposal their is no reason why he can't play 100 games for the AFC

Why can't he kick at 24 years of age?

If you can't kick, you can't play.
Blighty Teasdale - SuperCoach former World No. 1
User avatar
McAlmanac
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 1616
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 11:29 am
Location: Baseball Ground
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 2 times

Re: Pick 64 vs pick 71

Postby Psyber » Mon Aug 06, 2007 12:00 am

McAlmanac wrote:
sydney-dog wrote:but what I will say, I am happy with the way Gill is attacking his footy and if he can work hard on his disposal their is no reason why he can't play 100 games for the AFC

Why can't he kick at 24 years of age?

If you can't kick, you can't play.

But you do have to get it first even if you are a great kick!
EPIGENETICS - Lamarck was right!
User avatar
Psyber
Coach
 
 
Posts: 12247
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 10:43 pm
Location: Now back in the Adelaide Hills.
Has liked: 104 times
Been liked: 405 times
Grassroots Team: Hahndorf

Previous

Board index   Football  AFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |