by Tight_Lines » Sun Jun 03, 2007 8:36 pm
by Hasbeen » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:06 pm
by Hasbeen » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:11 pm
by rod_rooster » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:48 pm
hondo71 wrote:rod_rooster wrote:I'm a huge fan of the State of Origin concept but looking at the sides that would play i'd be happy to give it a miss for a while yet. The sides that have been suggested for SA on this thread are very ordinary and the Vic side that was suggested would absolutely smash us. What would a WA side look like? I imagine they would be fairly strong.
That's no reason not to have it, in fact that's the point of having it. The best players v best players ..... besides there are a few all-Australians in the SA line-up so I wouldn't write us off too soon. In the 80s half our side wasn't even playing in the VFL and yet we often won. Having a closer look at our side it's pretty strong IMO, line the players up position-for-position and it's pretty close. Rutten did a number on J Brown a few weeks ago for example. O'Loughlin, Burton, Ebert, Pavlich, Tredrea (if fit) is not far off the best forward line as SA has had IMO. Cornes and Rutten not a bad FB/CHB combo. Rutten all-Australian, Cornes a chance for the Brownlow arguably.
by Hondo » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:53 pm
rod_rooster wrote:I had my tongue in cheek saying we shouldn't have it based on the fact SA would get flogged.
by rod_rooster » Sun Jun 03, 2007 9:57 pm
hondo71 wrote:rod_rooster wrote:I had my tongue in cheek saying we shouldn't have it based on the fact SA would get flogged.
Oh OK![]()
Is tongue in check when you say we would get flogged?
by Hondo » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:08 pm
rod_rooster wrote:hondo71 wrote:rod_rooster wrote:I had my tongue in cheek saying we shouldn't have it based on the fact SA would get flogged.
Oh OK![]()
Is tongue in check when you say we would get flogged?
No the SA side posted would get smashed by the Vic side posted. It should still be played though if for no other reason than to prove me wrong
by rod_rooster » Sun Jun 03, 2007 10:14 pm
hondo71 wrote:rod_rooster wrote:hondo71 wrote:rod_rooster wrote:I had my tongue in cheek saying we shouldn't have it based on the fact SA would get flogged.
Oh OK![]()
Is tongue in check when you say we would get flogged?
No the SA side posted would get smashed by the Vic side posted. It should still be played though if for no other reason than to prove me wrong
You don't think 3 all-Australians Bassett, Rutten and Cornes can hold Fev, Hall & Brown (Riewoldt not eligible for Vic)?
Is this back-line that scary for Tredrea, O'Loughlin, Pav & Co?
HB H.Shaw D.Milburn L.Hodge
FB D.Fletcher M.Scarlett J.Bowden
It's all hypothetical, we'll have to agree to disagree and check in next year
by macdog3 » Mon Jun 04, 2007 12:14 pm
by Tight_Lines » Mon Jun 04, 2007 1:51 pm
by the joker » Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:18 pm
so you would put thomas in before didak as a crumbing forward you are a north supporter arent youDutchy wrote:I think you need a crumbing forward....as a wildcard I would put in Thomas..
by NFC » Wed Jun 06, 2007 4:46 pm
Tight_Lines wrote:Beau Waters had a gig in the back pocket didnt he? I dont think that the defence would stretch the SA boys the match would be a shootout but with Judd, Bartel, Mitchell, Dal Santo, Hodge lacing out Fev, Brown and Hall then that would stretch the SA defence. come a shootout i'd put my money on the Vics but wouldn't it great to see them lose something more for them all to complain about.
by blink » Thu Jun 07, 2007 10:02 am
the joker wrote:so you would put thomas in before didak as a crumbing forward you are a north supporter arent youDutchy wrote:I think you need a crumbing forward....as a wildcard I would put in Thomas..
by Tight_Lines » Thu Jun 07, 2007 12:51 pm
by the joker » Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:02 pm
shane edwards???Tight_Lines wrote:Well then who else do you think could be the next big South Australian in a couple of years? other then Bryce Gibbs of course and Thomas
by the joker » Thu Jun 07, 2007 4:03 pm
you are kidding yourself arent youblink wrote:the joker wrote:so you would put thomas in before didak as a crumbing forward you are a north supporter arent youDutchy wrote:I think you need a crumbing forward....as a wildcard I would put in Thomas..
That is not such a stupid idea there from Dutchy. Maybe not now, but I reckon in a couple of years Lindsay Thomas will be as good as Didak.
by the joker » Fri Jun 08, 2007 10:39 pm
joel bowden is from the northern territoryTight_Lines wrote:FF B.Hall B.Fevola G.Ablett
HF N.Riewoldt J.Brown (VC) P.Chapman
C D.Cross C.Judd (C) N.Dal Santo
HB H.Shaw D.Milburn L.Hodge
FB D.Fletcher M.Scarlett J.Bowden
1R J.White S.Mitchell S.West
Int J.Bartel J.Fraser M.Lloyd H.Scotland
Others- T.Johnstone, L.Hayes, C.Bruce, J.Lewis, L Ball, C Mooney
Haven't seen a Vic side written up yet but i just threw this side together quickly. And im not 100% sure on a fews origins especially the highlighted ones (I think Riewoldts a tazzy????) but still a side similiar to this would defiantly give us SA boys a hiding i think. Anyone who missed or should be their loved to hear your thoughts. I Couldnt pick a decent ruckmen though it is very rough side i tried to pick it on current form more then anything. And what about Allies and the WA side how would they line up?
by The sarge » Mon Jun 11, 2007 8:43 pm
by redden whites » Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:00 pm
by giffo » Mon Jun 11, 2007 11:03 pm
Justin Westhoff, he's plenty bigthe joker wrote:shane edwards???Tight_Lines wrote:Well then who else do you think could be the next big South Australian in a couple of years? other then Bryce Gibbs of course and Thomas
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |