Ticket Sales Slow for the Power v Crows game

[power01]

FFS i can read!!... but obviously you didnt understand that the reference i made about double standards wasnt in reference to your actions....honestly wedgie forget it, its just not worth discussing...............you dont understand my point and thats fair enough I would expect nothing less.......

If you can read then you dont understand the English language.
How can it be a double standard if I put myself in the same category of those who Im criticising,ie using the same standard for myself and the target group?
Your point was it was a double standard when clearly its not.
Quite the opposite.
If you're going to make incorrect or stupid comments be prepared to be quizzed on it on this site as the level of intelligence is a bit higher than you're used to.

Now after you gone out your way to insult me as much as possible...I will slowly explain what I meant by "Double Standard"....i'll do it in simple english

My remarks of double standards refered to the continious use of the term Feral, by one particular user when discussing Port Supporters..........I admittedly became cranky and used the work "D****head".........in YOUR post me myself as you explained dont use those terms towards other users (Fair enough)........so my point is/was it seems ok to call someone a feral but not a d****head..............that is ther source of my double standards reference.............

now I dont know if I can make my explaination any simplier................now you have made reference to my intelligence, lack of understanding of the english language.......so wedgie as you can see the comment was in no way a personal reference to yourself (which you seem to think it is)..........

so you can probably see the comment was neither stupid nor was it incorrect, infact it was your good self that seemed to believe my comment was direct at yourself................so may I suggest you ask next time..

[Dirko]

If you love ya footy, who cares bout the Crows/Power game....get down to the SANFL today for REAL atmosphere (or yesterday for Doggies/South).
Wish I was at the 'G yesterday to see my Blue Baggers run over Essendon....Beautiful thing ! Maybe Bryce will get the rising star nimination also !

[Coorong]

FFS i can read!!... but obviously you didnt understand that the reference i made about double standards wasnt in reference to your actions....honestly wedgie forget it, its just not worth discussing...............you dont understand my point and thats fair enough I would expect nothing less.......

If you can read then you dont understand the English language.
How can it be a double standard if I put myself in the same category of those who Im criticising,ie using the same standard for myself and the target group?
Your point was it was a double standard when clearly its not.
Quite the opposite.
If you're going to make incorrect or stupid comments be prepared to be quizzed on it on this site as the level of intelligence is a bit higher than you're used to.

Now after you gone out your way to insult me as much as possible...I will slowly explain what I meant by "Double Standard"....i'll do it in simple english

My remarks of double standards refered to the continious use of the term Feral, by one particular user when discussing Port Supporters..........I admittedly became cranky and used the work "D****head".........in YOUR post me myself as you explained dont use those terms towards other users (Fair enough)........so my point is/was it seems ok to call someone a feral but not a d****head..............that is ther source of my double standards reference.............

now I dont know if I can make my explaination any simplier................now you have made reference to my intelligence, lack of understanding of the english language.......so wedgie as you can see the comment was in no way a personal reference to yourself (which you seem to think it is)..........

so you can probably see the comment was neither stupid nor was it incorrect, infact it was your good self that seemed to believe my comment was direct at yourself................so may I suggest you ask next time..

Pudding/Proof/Intha.

[Wedgie]

Now after you gone out your way to insult me as much as possible...I will slowly explain what I meant by "Double Standard"....i'll do it in simple english

My remarks of double standards refered to the continious use of the term Feral, by one particular user when discussing Port Supporters..........I admittedly became cranky and used the work "D****head".........in YOUR post me myself as you explained dont use those terms towards other users (Fair enough)........so my point is/was it seems ok to call someone a feral but not a d****head..............that is ther source of my double standards reference.............

now I dont know if I can make my explaination any simplier................now you have made reference to my intelligence, lack of understanding of the english language.......so wedgie as you can see the comment was in no way a personal reference to yourself (which you seem to think it is)..........

so you can probably see the comment was neither stupid nor was it incorrect, infact it was your good self that seemed to believe my comment was direct at yourself................so may I suggest you ask next time..

See your explanation actually shows how stupid you are. My post criticises people who generalise AFL supporters and I criticised that group of people saying I myself was one of those who are guilty of it more than others. Criticsing a group of people and calling myself one of the worst offenders is not double standards, it is the same standard. I criticise a group of people and using the same standard criticise myself, it is the opposite to using double standards.
If I'd criticises people for generalising AFL supporters and not included myself as a guilty party then Yes, it would be a double standard and very hypocritical of me but that wasn't the case.
I haven't read any previous posts in this thread hence any reference to them by yourself is irrelevent, you criticised me incorrectly after my point was made through your lack of understanding of the English language. Pure and simple. If you're going to say I have double standards when quoting one of my posts explain how that post is a double standard (which you have failed to do) or don't comment.

power01, what I'd suggest for you on this site as you have a bit of an issue with reading or understanding is when you read posts, address the issue instead of addressing the poster. If you're just going to insult people then get upset when they insult you back with better evidence supporting them you're just going to turn this site into a circus that some others are or were and we don't want that.

Read about an issue, if you have something to add to that issue then feel free to comment. If you have a bit of difficulty understanding the issue then steer clear of it, don't just feel the need to abuse someone especially when you don't have the intelligence to understand the issue being discussed.

As per Coorong's post above, the fact you can't even understand a simple point and feel the need to attack the poster without understanding that post is actually doing less for the cause of people calling Port supporters feral than you are doing good. If you wish to raise the profile of Port supporters I'd suggest you learn to to read and write or don't say anything mate.

Regards.

[power01]

Now after you gone out your way to insult me as much as possible...I will slowly explain what I meant by "Double Standard"....i'll do it in simple english

My remarks of double standards refered to the continious use of the term Feral, by one particular user when discussing Port Supporters..........I admittedly became cranky and used the work "D****head".........in YOUR post me myself as you explained dont use those terms towards other users (Fair enough)........so my point is/was it seems ok to call someone a feral but not a d****head..............that is ther source of my double standards reference.............

now I dont know if I can make my explaination any simplier................now you have made reference to my intelligence, lack of understanding of the english language.......so wedgie as you can see the comment was in no way a personal reference to yourself (which you seem to think it is)..........

so you can probably see the comment was neither stupid nor was it incorrect, infact it was your good self that seemed to believe my comment was direct at yourself................so may I suggest you ask next time..

See your explanation actually shows how stupid you are. My post criticises people who generalise AFL supporters and I criticised that group of people saying I myself was one of those who are guilty of it more than others. Criticsing a group of people and calling myself one of the worst offenders is not double standards, it is the same standard. I criticise a group of people and using the same standard criticise myself, it is the opposite to using double standards.
If I'd criticises people for generalising AFL supporters and not included myself as a guilty party then Yes, it would be a double standard and very hypocritical of me but that wasn't the case.
I haven't read any previous posts in this thread hence any reference to them by yourself is irrelevent, you criticised me incorrectly after my point was made through your lack of understanding of the English language. Pure and simple. If you're going to say I have double standards when quoting one of my posts explain how that post is a double standard (which you have failed to do) or don't comment.

power01, what I'd suggest for you on this site as you have a bit of an issue with reading or understanding is when you read posts, address the issue instead of addressing the poster. If you're just going to insult people then get upset when they insult you back with better evidence supporting them you're just going to turn this site into a circus that some others are or were and we don't want that.

Read about an issue, if you have something to add to that issue then feel free to comment. If you have a bit of difficulty understanding the issue then steer clear of it, don't just feel the need to abuse someone especially when you don't have the intelligence to understand the issue being discussed.

As per Coorong's post above, the fact you can't even understand a simple point and feel the need to attack the poster without understanding that post is actually doing less for the cause of people calling Port supporters feral than you are doing good. If you wish to raise the profile of Port supporters I'd suggest you learn to to read and write or don't say anything mate.

Regards.

you really are quite a peace of work....as for personal insult you might want to read your last few posts to myself.....mate it really doesnt take much to push your buttons does it...............seriously if cant understand the last point i made (which i made very clear about double standards).....mate you are a lost cause.........you just have to scratch the surface to show your true colours...........I simply shake my frigging head!!!!!!........may I suggest anger management..........

Maybe I just expected more..................very dissappointing...............

[Hondo]

I think you guys are closer to agreeing than you think.

Wedgie, Power01 is saying that no-one has picked up MW for throwing the first punch with the term 'feral', yet have attacked him for responding, and he thinks you should have had a go at MW as well as him. He over-reacted with the "dickhead" comment and I think he now accepts that wasn't the best way to go.

Power01, Wedgie is actually agreeing with you with that too many supporters throw generalisations around (him included) and we shouldn't. He hasn't singled out MW individually but, by assumption, MW is in his sights.

Still, the 'anger management', 'don't understand english' stuff is funny for us to read (but prob not so funny to you too). Is it possible you two can have a cyber-beer

[power01]

I think you guys are closer to agreeing than you think.

Wedgie, Power01 is saying that no-one has picked up MW for throwing the first punch with the term 'feral', yet have attacked him for responding, and he thinks you should have had a go at MW as well as him. He over-reacted with the "dickhead" comment and I think he now accepts that wasn't the best way to go.

Power01, Wedgie is actually agreeing with you with that too many supporters throw generalisations around (him included) and we shouldn't. He hasn't singled out MW individually but, by assumption, MW is in his sights.

Still, the 'anger management', 'don't understand english' stuff is funny for us to read (but prob not so funny to you too). Is it possible you two can have a cyber-beer

Now a cyber beer does sound good!!!!!!!!!!..................................

[MW]

I think you guys are closer to agreeing than you think.

Wedgie, Power01 is saying that no-one has picked up MW for throwing the first punch with the term 'feral', yet have attacked him for responding, and he thinks you should have had a go at MW as well as him. He over-reacted with the "dickhead" comment and I think he now accepts that wasn't the best way to go.

Power01, Wedgie is actually agreeing with you with that too many supporters throw generalisations around (him included) and we shouldn't. He hasn't singled out MW individually but, by assumption, MW is in his sights.

Still, the 'anger management', 'don't understand english' stuff is funny for us to read (but prob not so funny to you too). Is it possible you two can have a cyber-beer

He's done that plenty of times in the past

[carey18]

Gee MW all this anger towards you and you are actually a nice bloke!

[MW]

Gee MW all this anger towards you and you are actually a nice bloke!

cheers carey18, I owe you one of these

[power01]

I think you guys are closer to agreeing than you think.

Wedgie, Power01 is saying that no-one has picked up MW for throwing the first punch with the term 'feral', yet have attacked him for responding, and he thinks you should have had a go at MW as well as him. He over-reacted with the "dickhead" comment and I think he now accepts that wasn't the best way to go.

Power01, Wedgie is actually agreeing with you with that too many supporters throw generalisations around (him included) and we shouldn't. He hasn't singled out MW individually but, by assumption, MW is in his sights.

Still, the 'anger management', 'don't understand english' stuff is funny for us to read (but prob not so funny to you too). Is it possible you two can have a cyber-beer

Cheers hondo71, i think you put that beautifully................cheers

[Dogwatcher]

You're both bloody ferals! Get over it.