"Thug"

All discussions to do with the SANFL

"Thug"

Postby Punk Rooster » Fri Jan 20, 2006 8:56 am

I noticed some time ago, that some nuffies refer to Dean Howard as "Thug". I think he'll be a great bloke to have around the club, & if his "crime" was thumping a Glenelg player, then I'll make sure that the Queen herself is aware of this, so that his nomination for a Knighthood can be accepted.
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby redandblack » Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:24 am

He thumped a Norwood player :D
redandblack
 

Postby stan » Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:29 am

redandblack wrote:He thumped a Norwood player :D


even if this topic is tongue and cheek or just a bit of fishing you should remember that hitting a bloke behind the play while he is not watching is a disgraceful act and a scurge of the game. This type of action is what is wrong with the ameture league and many other football competitions. This type of action is unwelome in the sanfl. Disgrace.
Read my reply. It is directed at you because you have double standards
User avatar
stan
Coach
 
 
Posts: 15512
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:53 am
Location: North Eastern Suburbs
Has liked: 88 times
Been liked: 1318 times
Grassroots Team: Goodwood Saints

Postby topsywaldron » Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:37 am

stan wrote:even if this topic is tongue and cheek or just a bit of fishing..


Suspect the latter here Stan.
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Postby am Bays » Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:38 am

Why is it that when an player hits a bloke and he is on the opposition he is a "dirty cheating sniper/bludger/"thug"/animal/low life/ (inset any appropriate term)"

But when they play for your club they are "misunderstod/provoked/good bloke once you get to know them/recommended for a knighthood/ (inset any appropriate term)".

No wonder the most common respeonse in the budget player profiles category "pet hates" is fickle supporters....
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19721
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby Punk Rooster » Fri Jan 20, 2006 9:49 am

The rule is simple... You play for North, we love you. You play for anyone else, we hate you! (Exception is any North player who doesn't leave by choice)
Ralph Wiggum wrote:That's where I saw the leprechaun. He told me to burn things

Ken Farmer>John Coleman

Hindmarsh Pest Control
User avatar
Punk Rooster
Coach
 
 
Posts: 11948
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 9:30 am
Location: Paper Street Soap Company
Has liked: 16 times
Been liked: 16 times
Grassroots Team: Fitzroy

Postby RoostersRuleTheWorld ! » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:05 am

:P I Agree Punk !
User avatar
RoostersRuleTheWorld !
Under 16s
 
Posts: 265
Joined: Sun Oct 30, 2005 12:31 pm
Location: Moonta Bay
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby Wedgie » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:13 am

1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Why is it that when an player hits a bloke and he is on the opposition he is a "dirty cheating sniper/bludger/"thug"/animal/low life/ (inset any appropriate term)"

But when they play for your club they are "misunderstod/provoked/good bloke once you get to know them/recommended for a knighthood/ (inset any appropriate term)".

No wonder the most common respeonse in the budget player profiles category "pet hates" is fickle supporters....


Quite simple really, footy is an emotiaonal game with fierce loyalties.
The same reason people who get transporting drugs are described by their families as top people who are misunderstood.
I wouldn't describe that as fickle, probably the opposite, I tend to think of the fickle supporter described by players as a pet hate as the supporter who cheers and tells the footy players how great they are after a win but are the first to boo and abuse the same players if they lose.

Personally I can think of two thug acts by North Adelaide players that I would have been ropable if it was the other way around, ironically both against Westies players who have been trying to drag us into fights to put us off our games for the last 20 years!
1st at Richmond Oval when Steven Riley broke Roger Luders jaw
2nd in 1991 GF when Steven Sims (must be something about Steven's) hit Matthew Simpson from behind in the old scoreboard pocket, I was at the top of the councourse near the scoreboard and heard the thud as clear as if it were next to me, it was quite sickening. Having said that if Westies hadn't tried to put Darel Hart off his game by illegally roughing up prior it would have never happened.

I actually saw worse things happen in C Grade Southern League in the 5 years I played than in the 30 years I've been watching SANFL.
User avatar
Wedgie
Site Admin
 
 
Posts: 51721
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 8:00 am
Has liked: 2153 times
Been liked: 4093 times
Grassroots Team: Noarlunga

Postby BubblesOfBlue » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:17 am

southern League C grade has had some beauties but is not too bad now.
BubblesOfBlue
Rookie
 
 
Posts: 195
Joined: Wed Nov 23, 2005 1:01 pm
Has liked: 1 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Flagstaff Hill

Postby redandblack » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:21 am

Calm down, people.

The Howard "THUG" comment is tongue-in-cheek, relating to a fight between Howard and Heath Culpitt a couple of years ago. It wasn't behind the play, but caused a debate between some West and Glenelg supporters.

Both players now play for other clubs, so they are both "THUGS" as far as we are concerned :)
redandblack
 

Postby JK » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:27 am

Wedgie wrote:
1980 Tassie Medalist wrote:Why is it that when an player hits a bloke and he is on the opposition he is a "dirty cheating sniper/bludger/"thug"/animal/low life/ (inset any appropriate term)"

But when they play for your club they are "misunderstod/provoked/good bloke once you get to know them/recommended for a knighthood/ (inset any appropriate term)".

No wonder the most common respeonse in the budget player profiles category "pet hates" is fickle supporters....


Quite simple really, footy is an emotiaonal game with fierce loyalties.
The same reason people who get transporting drugs are described by their families as top people who are misunderstood.
I wouldn't describe that as fickle, probably the opposite, I tend to think of the fickle supporter described by players as a pet hate as the supporter who cheers and tells the footy players how great they are after a win but are the first to boo and abuse the same players if they lose.

Personally I can think of two thug acts by North Adelaide players that I would have been ropable if it was the other way around, ironically both against Westies players who have been trying to drag us into fights to put us off our games for the last 20 years!
1st at Richmond Oval when Steven Riley broke Roger Luders jaw
2nd in 1991 GF when Steven Sims (must be something about Steven's) hit Matthew Simpson from behind in the old scoreboard pocket, I was at the top of the councourse near the scoreboard and heard the thud as clear as if it were next to me, it was quite sickening. Having said that if Westies hadn't tried to put Darel Hart off his game by illegally roughing up prior it would have never happened.

I actually saw worse things happen in C Grade Southern League in the 5 years I played than in the 30 years I've been watching SANFL.


Bradley Ryan's king-hit of Michael Aish at the Parade in about 1990 would surely have been in that category if you'd seen it mate, I've never seen a more cowardly act in footy (well at that high a level anyway)!!
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

Postby am Bays » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:29 am

Good post Wedgie, 100% agree, I was taking a philosophical point of view.

I am guilty as charged when it comes to have hypocritical opinions on certain players - just my emotions getting the bettr of me.

Medallist goes back into his box!!
Let that be a lesson to you Port, no one beats the Bays five times in a row in a GF and gets away with it!!!
User avatar
am Bays
Coach
 
 
Posts: 19721
Joined: Sat Dec 17, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: The back bar at Lennies
Has liked: 182 times
Been liked: 2122 times

Postby Leaping Lindner » Fri Jan 20, 2006 10:59 am

Constance_Perm wrote:
Bradley Ryan's king-hit of Michael Aish at the Parade in about 1990 would surely have been in that category if you'd seen it mate, I've never seen a more cowardly act in footy (well at that high a level anyway)!!


Gary McIntosh king hitting Chris Ladhams in 1998. See depends on the team you follow :wink:
"They got Burton suits, ha, you think it's funny,turning rebellion into money"
User avatar
Leaping Lindner
Assistant Coach
 
 
Posts: 4325
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 12:02 pm
Location: Victoria
Has liked: 17 times
Been liked: 48 times

Postby doggies4eva » Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:08 am

I seem to remember a game at Norwood Oval (Norwood v Central)- must have been in the 80s when an all-in fight before the inital bounce. Resulted in Gilbert McAdam going off for stitches before the game started. If thats not thuggery what is?
We used to be good :-(
User avatar
doggies4eva
League - Best 21
 
 
Posts: 2473
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 2:23 pm
Location: In front of a computer screen
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time

Postby JK » Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:20 am

Leaping Lindner wrote:
Constance_Perm wrote:
Bradley Ryan's king-hit of Michael Aish at the Parade in about 1990 would surely have been in that category if you'd seen it mate, I've never seen a more cowardly act in footy (well at that high a level anyway)!!


Gary McIntosh king hitting Chris Ladhams in 1998. See depends on the team you follow :wink:


Didn't see the incident LL and am somewhat shocked given Macca's gentle nature :wink: ... Was just replying to Wedgies comments of the worst incidents he'd witnessed, certainly not trying to suggest my club (or anyones for that matter) is better or worse than any other.

D4E, that game was in 1988, both teams warming up at the same end (Centrals there first, so most likely our fault) and I remember McAdam coming off for stitches prior to the first bounce ... Both teams would have had quite a few sore and sorry boys the next day...
User avatar
JK
Coach
 
 
Posts: 37460
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Coopers Hill
Has liked: 4485 times
Been liked: 3024 times
Grassroots Team: SMOSH West Lakes

thugs

Postby bayman » Fri Jan 20, 2006 11:59 am

at least scooter wasn't a thug he was just tough !!!!!!!!
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Postby topsywaldron » Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:08 pm

Craig Balme walloping Roano Negri and spitting on him while he lay on the ground was none too classy.

First SANFL player to be sent off, Norwood pacesetters once more!
User avatar
topsywaldron
Veteran
 
Posts: 3512
Joined: Fri Nov 25, 2005 5:16 pm
Has liked: 21 times
Been liked: 218 times

Postby drebin » Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:17 pm

surely bayman you are tongue in cheek re Scott Salisbury or did you foget his raised elbow against Woodville in that Night game plus numerous other indiscretions in the Macca mould. :roll:
drebin
 

drebin

Postby bayman » Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:21 pm

!!!!!!!!!!!! = toungue in cheek

but if you remember he was not guilty because of concussion !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
i thought secret groups were a thing of the past, well not on websites anyway
bayman
Coach
 
 
Posts: 13922
Joined: Sun Nov 06, 2005 9:12 pm
Location: home
Has liked: 0 time
Been liked: 0 time
Grassroots Team: Plympton

Postby Booney » Fri Jan 20, 2006 12:23 pm

drebin wrote:surely bayman you are tongue in cheek re Scott Salisbury or did you foget his raised elbow against Woodville in that Night game plus numerous other indiscretions in the Macca mould. :roll:


I dont think tongue in cheek is appropriate when mentioning Salisbury's playing style,I think elbow in cheek is more apt.

Yours truly Greg Anderson.
If you want to go quickly, go alone.

If you want to go far, go together.
User avatar
Booney
Coach
 
 
Posts: 61563
Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2005 1:47 pm
Location: Alberton proud
Has liked: 8181 times
Been liked: 11910 times

Next

Board index   Football  SANFL

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hazydog and 15 guests

Around the place

Competitions   SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums   Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |