Punk Rooster wrote:I'd say you'd be having your second crack at 30Sheik Yerbouti wrote: most of us are into our 30's & beyond ?
Definately part of the ''beyond'' group bug boy.
by Sheik Yerbouti » Thu Feb 02, 2006 3:48 pm
Punk Rooster wrote:I'd say you'd be having your second crack at 30Sheik Yerbouti wrote: most of us are into our 30's & beyond ?
by Wedgie » Fri Feb 03, 2006 9:01 am
Sheik Yerbouti wrote:Nice piece of deleting Sister Mary Joshepha.
by am Bays » Sun Feb 05, 2006 7:56 am
by stan » Sun Feb 05, 2006 5:02 pm
by doggies4eva » Mon Feb 06, 2006 2:48 pm
stan wrote:Well they won in the end so i guess you would look at them an say that they are the team to beat this year.
by Ian » Tue Feb 07, 2006 12:22 am
doggies4eva wrote:stan wrote:Well they won in the end so i guess you would look at them an say that they are the team to beat this year.
I wouldn't. I was at the game and as I said on the other thread Norf only won cause they kicked straighter. They looked slow and fumbly. A lot more work to do before April me thinks.
by drebin » Tue Feb 07, 2006 7:47 am
doggies4eva wrote:stan wrote:Well they won in the end so i guess you would look at them an say that they are the team to beat this year.
I wouldn't. I was at the game and as I said on the other thread Norf only won cause they kicked straighter. They looked slow and fumbly. A lot more work to do before April me thinks.
by doggies4eva » Tue Feb 07, 2006 2:24 pm
drebin wrote:doggies4eva wrote:stan wrote:Well they won in the end so i guess you would look at them an say that they are the team to beat this year.
I wouldn't. I was at the game and as I said on the other thread Norf only won cause they kicked straighter. They looked slow and fumbly. A lot more work to do before April me thinks.
North were certainly not slow - they fumbled early because of the humidity and playing with the floating Burley football. The NT's bad kicking didn't help them and despite there supposed pace - they ran out of legs and had no body strength against our bigger bodies. A slow team does not win by 4 goals.
If that game had been played in Adelaide - North would have won by 10 goals plus - that is what the NT coach said on Sunday arvo.
by drebin » Tue Feb 07, 2006 3:23 pm
by doggies4eva » Tue Feb 07, 2006 4:07 pm
drebin wrote:I did however read some interesting comments on the bulldog banter section of the Centrals forum about the NT game and North's chances this year. One person said he didn't think North looked much bigger than the NT - he must have been at another game - as we were a lot bigger in height and body weight. He obviously did not get a look at Owen Weatherly who will easily be the biggest bodied (muscle wise) player in the SANFL this year and he is agro to go with it. Others made comments about we won't improve much which is fine - early days yet, but when you add another ruckman to our team (Wakelin) plus our CHF - Alleway who is about the same build as Weatherly, Cox our CHB - who is a big boy himself plus our Captain Wintle I think you will see an improved North. I'm not saying premiership as I still think Centrals start favourites and deservedly so but I had to chuckle at some of the posts. I think some people, when they see the size of the North key position players plus the addition of a couple of new faster midfielders then they might be suprised. Still if people don't take off the blinkers how will they see?
by doggies4eva » Tue Feb 07, 2006 5:14 pm
by drebin » Tue Feb 07, 2006 9:07 pm
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |