SA Footy

Ecky/Spelly...can you help me out with recent records between these two teams, esp at Prossie?...Cheers

NORTH v SOUTH
2.15pm Saturday April 28th @ Prospect Oval
Since 1907 Record : Played 236, North won 162, South won 72, Drawn 2
All Time @ Prospect : Played 87, North won 64, South won 23
All Recent Encounters : North have won last 5.
Recent @ Prospect : North won the last two encounters, South the previous 6

Recent Results
2006 1SF Sept 24 @ Adelaide North 14.18.102 d South 11.11.77 by 25pts
2006 Rd 21 Aug 26 @ Prospect North 21.15.141 d South 16.6.102 by 39pts
2006 Rd 14 July 8 @ Prospect North 20.18.138 d South 13.12.90 by 48pts
2006 Rd 2 April 8 @ Noarlunga North 20.21.141 d South 19.9.123 by 18pts
2005 Rd 19 Aug 6 @ Noarlunga North 11.15.81 d South 10.6.66 by 15pts
2005 Rd 9 May 28 @ Prospect South 22.17.149 d North 14.7.91 by 58pts
Last Draw
2003 Rd 9 May 24 @ Noarlunga South 16.13.109 v North 16.13.109

RECORDS
Highest Score North - 34.22.226 (Rd7 May13 1972 @Ad) South - 29.20.194 (Rd9 May28 1977 @Ad)
Lowest Score North - 2.15.27 (Rd3 May15 1909 @Ad*) South - 2.0.12 (Rd3 May15 1909 @Ad)
Highest Losing Score North - 18.18.126 (Rd16 July17 1985 @Ad) South - 20.15.135 (Rd2 Apr22 1967 @Ad)
Lowest Winning Score North - 2.15.27 (Rd3 May15 1909 @Ad) South - 6.6.42 (Rd2 May10 1920 @Ad)
Biggest Winning Margin North - 178pts (Rd7 May13 1972 @Ad) South - 118pts (Rd9 May28 1977 @Ad)

BROADCAST ON – ABC TV / 1197am RPH Adelaide

1909, 1920 sounds like a history lesson.

For you Bay supporters I'll spell it.... H..I..S..T..O..R..Y

Thanks Wedgie, why do South fans say they have a good recent record against South?

Dutchy wrote:Thanks Wedgie, why do South fans say they have a good recent record against South?

Generally South does pretty well in the internal trials

Spiritof64 wrote:1909, 1920 sounds like a history lesson.

For you Bay supporters I'll spell it.... H..I..S..T..O..R..Y

Ahh the best kind of history is the one you can remember......or were at....

So what is it like to win a flag Spirit??

i reckon this one will be a good game...north favs but both teams have underperformed so far altho its early....id say both teams here would love to come away with the 2 points and south have dont pretty well at prossie lately, er pre 2005 !!!

think ill listen to this game since sturt are only getting round the grounds coverage!

Jimmy wrote:i reckon this one will be a good game...north favs but both teams have underperformed so far altho its early....id say both teams here would love to come away with the 2 points and south have dont pretty well at prossie lately, er pre 2005 !!!

think ill listen to this game since sturt are only getting round the grounds coverage!

Under performed??? We have played 2, belted West in one and lost to Centrals in the season opener, who if you didn't happen to see it today, destroyed the Eagles and clearly are miles ahead of the rest of the comp and absolutely hot flag favourites and seriously I can't see any side even remotely challenging them this year. You of course would say Sturt can after your team's incredible start to the year and clearly they are not under performed - after 3 games!

So Jimmy, seeing as how you get around to all the games from NY - tell us what you base your assessment on re the fact North have under performed so far this season after only 2 games and then we can pass you expert opinion onto the North Coaches to make the relevant ajustments so we can perhaps match the "dizzy" heights of Sturt presently!!!

Heeeeeeeeee's back!!!

Dutchy wrote:Heeeeeeeeee's back!!!

lol, yeah, i thought he said he was never going to come back after the incident with his daughter and the port fan i believe it was.

BPBRB wrote:

Jimmy wrote:i reckon this one will be a good game...north favs but both teams have underperformed so far altho its early....id say both teams here would love to come away with the 2 points and south have dont pretty well at prossie lately, er pre 2005 !!!

think ill listen to this game since sturt are only getting round the grounds coverage!

Under performed??? We have played 2, belted West in one and lost to Centrals in the season opener, who if you didn't happen to see it today, destroyed the Eagles and clearly are miles ahead of the rest of the comp and absolutely hot flag favourites and seriously I can't see any side even remotely challenging them this year. You of course would say Sturt can after your team's incredible start to the year and clearly they are not under performed - after 3 games!

So Jimmy, seeing as how you get around to all the games from NY - tell us what you base your assessment on re the fact North have under performed so far this season after only 2 games and then we can pass you expert opinion onto the North Coaches to make the relevant ajustments so we can perhaps match the "dizzy" heights of Sturt presently!!!

gee, you are a drama ******* queen arent ya....sorry for having an opinion chief, but after reading these boards and the roost pretty extensively, i thought id have a say...

i think all the boards should close down seeing as nothing seems to be right for you big fella...

Jimmy wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Heeeeeeeeee's back!!!

lol, yeah, i thought he said he was never going to come back after the incident with his daughter and the port fan i believe it was.

Dude, that happened before this site even existed, he makes some relevent points, why don't you address them instead of just being defensive?

You could say that North have underperformed because of a lack lustre pre season and going on their result at Elizabeth this year and last they've gone backwards there too and beating West proves nothing., see, not hard mate. If people have opinions they're willing to state they should be willing to back them up with some sort of reasoning.

Prediction!!!
some time tonight there'll be a post with a plethora of smileys & winkys trying to cover up a record breaking backpeddle.

Jimmy wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Heeeeeeeeee's back!!!

lol, yeah, i thought he said he was never going to come back after the incident with his daughter and the port fan i believe it was.

Hmm using that incident involving my daughter is your qualified response to the questions I posed to you hey? Good one Jimmy Read your original post and my reply and answer the questions at hand. You can't expect opposition supporters not to take you to task if you make "sweeping" statements like you did without any fact to support it.

Jimmy wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Heeeeeeeeee's back!!!

lol, yeah, i thought he said he was never going to come back after the incident with his daughter and the port fan i believe it was.

Don't kow BPBRB,or you or the incident you refer to Jimmy, but that seemed a bit below the belt. Have enjoyed reading your posts in the past and you seemed like a pretty considered chap IMHO

Jimmy wrote:

BPBRB wrote:

Jimmy wrote:i reckon this one will be a good game...north favs but both teams have underperformed so far altho its early....id say both teams here would love to come away with the 2 points and south have dont pretty well at prossie lately, er pre 2005 !!!

think ill listen to this game since sturt are only getting round the grounds coverage!

Under performed??? We have played 2, belted West in one and lost to Centrals in the season opener, who if you didn't happen to see it today, destroyed the Eagles and clearly are miles ahead of the rest of the comp and absolutely hot flag favourites and seriously I can't see any side even remotely challenging them this year. You of course would say Sturt can after your team's incredible start to the year and clearly they are not under performed - after 3 games!

So Jimmy, seeing as how you get around to all the games from NY - tell us what you base your assessment on re the fact North have under performed so far this season after only 2 games and then we can pass you expert opinion onto the North Coaches to make the relevant ajustments so we can perhaps match the "dizzy" heights of Sturt presently!!!

gee, you are a drama ******* queen arent ya....sorry for having an opinion chief, but after reading these boards and the roost pretty extensively, i thought id have a say...

i think all the boards should close down seeing as nothing seems to be right for you big fella...

heres my response....ppl miss it i guess???

and wedgie, thats pretty much what i read from the roost. cheers

johntheclaret wrote:

Jimmy wrote:

Dutchy wrote:Heeeeeeeeee's back!!!

lol, yeah, i thought he said he was never going to come back after the incident with his daughter and the port fan i believe it was.

Don't kow BPBRB,or you or the incident you refer to Jimmy, but that seemed a bit below the belt. Have enjoyed reading your posts in the past and you seemed like a pretty considered chap IMHO

john, i didnt say anything about the incident, just that when that occured, he said he would never be back, but he is. I dont really care though, probably should never have brought it up. oh well. my bad. I apologise for bringing it up.

Jimmy wrote: he said he would never be back, but he is.

Im still trying to work out how he said he'd never be back on this site when the incident you're talking about occurred 6 months before this site was even thought of??

Wedgie wrote:

Jimmy wrote: he said he would never be back, but he is.

Im still trying to work out how he said he'd never be back on this site when the incident you're talking about occurred 6 months before this site was even thought of??

then i must be mistaken then, but since both sites were running concurrently for a while i thought it may have been this one...once again, stand corrected.

Jimmy wrote:then i must be mistaken then, but since both sites were running concurrently for a while i thought it may have been this one...once again, stand corrected.

Well yes then you are mistaken, Im sure BPBRB will be extremely gracious when you make your apology to him.
(Incident was April 05, this site started late October 05)