SA Footy

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:01 pm**

What are both sets of fans hoping to get out of tonight's final trial match?

From a Sturt point of view, I understand we will be resting some key players such as Nelson, Feast, Whiteman and possibly Sheedy. This will obviously give the likes of DeLuca, Eckermann and O'Keefe a chance to find some form for Round one.

Personally I am hoping to see the boys demonstrate better use of the footy when they get their hands on it, something that was good against the Eagles but fell away last week against South. Delivery into the forwards is another thing I will be keen to observe.

Legs fans? (CP, Manny, REB etc)

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:20 pm**

To be honest MST, all I'm hoping for is an injury free night ... With our first game 6 days away and a couple of losses already to our first choice lineup (Hill, Campbell, Pfeiffer) it would make life even more difficult, for what is already a tough first round assignment against the Magpies.

Best result tonight would be to see some good performances from the fringe/understudy youngsters.

Coopers Stadium is a great place for a Pale Ale too, but that's a highlight that goes without saying!

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 2:39 pm**

A long winter.

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 3:45 pm**

Booney wrote:A long winter.

Hey Booney, start a Magpies thread you dirty, wharfie scum bag :wink:

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 3:53 pm**

NO INJURIES

and no wharfies!

regards,

REB

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:05 pm**

a nil all draw.

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:15 pm**

Blood in the streets. Upturned cars in flames.

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:17 pm**

Coorong wrote:a nil all draw.

That's tomorrows game at Richmond you are referring to Coorong?

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 4:18 pm**

Barto wrote:Blood in the streets. Upturned cars in flames.

Just to provide that little extra lighting of course :wink:

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:28 pm**

Constance_Perm wrote:
Barto wrote:Blood in the streets. Upturned cars in flames.

Just to provide that little extra lighting of course

You mean they still haven't upgraded that awful lighting at the ground???

Posted: **Fri Mar 30, 2007 5:51 pm**

Now come on mate, we don't wanna start comparing grounds do we? :wink:

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:01 am**

scores anyone??

best players etc etc....???

any riots? upturned cars? or worse yet.....wharfies?

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 12:37 am**

Jimmy wrote:scores anyone??

best players etc etc....???

any riots? upturned cars? or worse yet.....wharfies?

Norwood won by plenty.

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 1:32 am**

reserves

norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48

league

norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99

sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63

sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:15 am**

The Oval is a sham when it comes to hosting acceptable SANFL under lights.

The Norwood people are great but their lack of insight and knowledge is evident by their total disrespect for the public who bother to attend a game which carried absolutely no significance to what is going to occur over the next 6 months.

Rick is a smart operator and we have an astute Coaching Panel to assist him.

No Fish Burgers. No BBQ and an atmosphere which was about as inspiring as watching Keith Michell and Co perform in the Festival theatre many years ago

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 5:20 am**

I found the most inspiring aspect of a dull game Lower's intimidation of Chambo during the First Quarter.

How Chambo kept his cool is beyond me but at least Rick rested him in the last Quarter and expect him to continue his amazing performances at Broadspectrum on Easter Saturday :lol:

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 8:25 am**

Better lights at Norwood, the lights at Thebby are better and that's with half of them on.

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:01 am**

bayman wrote:reserves

norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48

league

norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99

sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63

sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily

Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:08 am**

sturt1 wrote:
bayman wrote:reserves

norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48

league

norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99

sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63

sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily

Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.

i hope you are right mate, but i aint going that far!!!!

lets keep this in perspective mate!!!

Posted: **Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:54 am**

sturt1 wrote:
bayman wrote:reserves

norwood 12.12.84 def sturt 7.6.48

league

norwood 4.6.30 8.9.57 10.12.72 13.15.99

sturt 1.3.9 4.4.28 7.5.47 9.9.63

sturt has no depth, 6 regulars out & they look small & ordinary while for norwood its the same as it has been for years no forwards they get plenty of the ball but fail to score heavily

Having said that, Sturt will finish higher than glenelg this season.

Sturt will finish HIGHER than Glenelg

I thought smoking dope was illegal

SA Footy

Norwood/Sturt fans. What are you expecting?

Norwood/Sturt fans. What are you expecting?

Norwood Sturt fans what do you expect?

Norwood Sturt Fans What do you expect?