SA Footy

If partington is back …missing 6-7 weeks of footy …surely not match ready ??

Or will the Bays start to panic and play him ??? Even if he is not 100% ???

southee wrote:If partington is back …missing 6-7 weeks of footy …surely not match ready ??

Or will the Bays start to panic and play him ??? Even if he is not 100% ???

PatowalongaPirate wrote:

southee wrote:If partington is back …missing 6-7 weeks of footy …surely not match ready ??

Or will the Bays start to panic and play him ??? Even if he is not 100% ???

This is the problem with an early thread, too much made up stuff.

Did Partington get bail or was he acquitted?

DOC wrote:This is the problem with an early thread, too much made up stuff.

Did Partington get bail or was he acquitted?

Acquitted after a blind trust donated $1m towards legal fees.

I thought the only Blind trusts were out Norwood way, but there you go....

Predicting Glenelg to win by 8-10 goals, then go on and win the Grand Final over Eagles by 6 goals.

Nobes from South played the game of his life against Norwood kicking four goals, he won’t get it that easy against Proud or Durdin. They will struggle to kick goals against a much better drilled team in Glenelg.

blueandwhite wrote:I thought the only Blind trusts were out Norwood way, but there you go....

Reckon it’s how they fund umpires’ wages.

Mitch O'Neill listed as a test. Would be a huge out, has played fantastic in the finals so far. Anyone have inside info if he'll play or not?

In all seriousness I am quietly confident of a win (mind you I was last week as well). I expect us to come to play at least 3 qtrs of footy (South will have their periods where they are up). We've been excellent all year at creating midfield pressure and winning clearances that allows us to get it into our three talls. Last we we were way down on fwd 50 entries which means we basically turned the ball over too easily in the midfield. We have a good disciplined defence that got put under pressure last week due to a lack of midfield and forward pressure, and midfield turnovers that meant they had minimal time to cover the eagles options. We bring the pressure and work rate to create spread through the midfield and get the ball deep into our fwd 50 we can get the job done.

However compared to a month a go South are much improved especially in their effort to create pressure and turnovers which allows them to create scoring opportunities. If we take them lightly....

However I believe in my boys to get the job done.

BTW we're 15 and 4 in prelims (if only that was our GF record..... )

am Bays wrote:In all seriousness I am quietly confident of a win (mind you I was last week as well). I expect us to come to play at least 3 qtrs of footy (South will have their periods where they are up). We've been excellent all year at creating midfield pressure and winning clearances that allows us to get it into our three talls. Last we we were way down on fwd 50 entries which means we basically turned the ball over too easily in the midfield. We have a good disciplined defence that got put under pressure last week due to a lack of midfield and forward pressure, and midfield turnovers that meant they had minimal time to cover the eagles options. We bring the pressure and work rate to create spread through the midfield and get the ball deep into our fwd 50 we can get the job done.

However compared to a month a go South are much improved especially in their effort to create pressure and turnovers which allows them to create scoring opportunities. If we take them lightly....

However I believe in my boys to get the job done.

Momentum is a funny thing...

Newton has three laws to describe this "funny thing"

whybother wrote:Newton has three laws to describe this "funny thing"

Bert had laws about Graham?

Pseudo wrote:

whybother wrote:Newton has three laws to describe this "funny thing"

Bert had laws about Graham?

Yes, never interrupt Graham when he was "Blank"....

am Bays wrote:

Pseudo wrote:

whybother wrote:Newton has three laws to describe this "funny thing"

Bert had laws about Graham?

Yes, never interrupt Graham when he was "Blank"....

Thats not what Cyril said

am Bays wrote:

Pseudo wrote:

whybother wrote:Newton has three laws to describe this "funny thing"

Bert had laws about Graham?

Yes, never interrupt Graham when he was "Blank"....

Go on, Peter, give it a pull.

Spargo wrote:

mots02 wrote:The Christie, Cornes, Schneebichler, Winton Cup.

Campbell, Hams, Scmidt…

shannon snook

stampy wrote:

Spargo wrote:

mots02 wrote:The Christie, Cornes, Schneebichler, Winton Cup.

Campbell, Hams, Scmidt…

shannon snook

Nigel Smart......?

Kym Koster, left us as Captain

Any chance of Jordan Moore making his debut in a Prelim?