SA Footy

Who will play. Only certanies are Sutcliffe and Wright.

Port by 10 goals.

Massive game this one, going to be hard to keep up with the chat in here about it.

Still waiting for your review from the Eagles game last week.

DOC wrote:Still waiting for your review from the Eagles game last week.

PORT

Port Adelaide has included a pair of new faces for its blockbuster SANFL Showdown against Adelaide at Adelaide Oval.

Collingwood premiership defender Tyson Goldsack and Woodville-West Torrens teenager Jase Burgoyne will both make their League debut against the Crows.

Goldsack has recovered from a knee injury while father-son prospect Burgoyne is spending the next month with Port as part of his involvement in the club’s Next Generation Academy.

The son of Peter Burgoyne will then return to Woodville-West Torrens for the remainder of the season ahead of the AFL Draft.

Miller Carter (20, 188cm and 86kg), the son of Magpies premiership defender Stephen Carter, could also make his debut.

League

F: Aldridge, Weidemann, Schofield

HF: Samblich, Edwards, Williams

C: Wong, Moore, Wildman

HB: Westbrook, Garner, J. Burgoyne

B: Strange, Goldsack, Carter



R: Hayes, Sutcliffe, Corcoran

INT: AFL Emergencies to be added

IN: Goldsack, Carter, J. Burgoyne

NEW: Tyson Goldsack (Collingwood), Jase Burgoyne (Woodville-West Torrens), Miller Carter (Port District)



ADELAIDE

Adelaide will unleash its latest recruit against Port Adelaide in the SANFL Showdown at Adelaide Oval.

Tasmanian Oliver Davis (19, 182cm and 75kg) will make his League debut on the wing after being signed up as a development player for the rest of the season.

The ball-winning midfielder will be joined by the Crows’ AFL emergencies who are yet to be names in the SANFL squad.

League

F: Newchurch, B. Davis, J. Mathews

HF: J. Cook, B. Cook, Hall

C: O. Davis, Jackson, Marini

HB: McAsey, Borlase, Wright

B: Latchford, Merrett, L. Mathews

mmm

Read the Port info regarding Burgoyne.

Pear Ressies by 10 goals.

DOC wrote:PORT

Port Adelaide has included a pair of new faces for its blockbuster SANFL Showdown against Adelaide at Adelaide Oval.

Collingwood premiership defender Tyson Goldsack and Woodville-West Torrens teenager Jase Burgoyne will both make their League debut against the Crows.

Goldsack has recovered from a knee injury while father-son prospect Burgoyne is spending the next month with Port as part of his involvement in the club’s Next Generation Academy.

The son of Peter Burgoyne will then return to Woodville-West Torrens for the remainder of the season ahead of the AFL Draft.

What are the WWTFC thinking allowing 1 of their players play for an opposition club in the same comp. How does the SANFL allow this? Does the SANFL not own this comp in anyway anymore?

goddy11 wrote:

DOC wrote:PORT

Port Adelaide has included a pair of new faces for its blockbuster SANFL Showdown against Adelaide at Adelaide Oval.

Collingwood premiership defender Tyson Goldsack and Woodville-West Torrens teenager Jase Burgoyne will both make their League debut against the Crows.

Goldsack has recovered from a knee injury while father-son prospect Burgoyne is spending the next month with Port as part of his involvement in the club’s Next Generation Academy.

The son of Peter Burgoyne will then return to Woodville-West Torrens for the remainder of the season ahead of the AFL Draft.

What are the WWTFC thinking allowing 1 of their players play for an opposition club in the same comp. How does the SANFL allow this? Does the SANFL not own this comp in anyway anymore?

Dumb hey

I don't know but dare say that the Eagles have no say in the matter.

They sure do. They have to clear him.

gazzamagoo wrote:

goddy11 wrote:

DOC wrote:PORT

Port Adelaide has included a pair of new faces for its blockbuster SANFL Showdown against Adelaide at Adelaide Oval.

Collingwood premiership defender Tyson Goldsack and Woodville-West Torrens teenager Jase Burgoyne will both make their League debut against the Crows.

Goldsack has recovered from a knee injury while father-son prospect Burgoyne is spending the next month with Port as part of his involvement in the club’s Next Generation Academy.

The son of Peter Burgoyne will then return to Woodville-West Torrens for the remainder of the season ahead of the AFL Draft.

What are the WWTFC thinking allowing 1 of their players play for an opposition club in the same comp. How does the SANFL allow this? Does the SANFL not own this comp in anyway anymore?

Dumb hey

I assume he is not playing league for the Eagles?
Smart move by them if he's not, gives him exposure at League level and they may call upon him later in the year knowing what they will get.

Im sure Goldsack is nervous and excited about his league debut

I found this on another site. Was it for money? Is it an AFL rule and overrides the SANFL.


AFL approved Next Generation Academy (NGA) and Father Son players can be temporarily permitted during their 18th and 19th years (the years in which they are eligible for drafting with concessions) if nominated by the AFL club they are aligned to. It should be noted that this is subject to the player electing and agreeing to being nominated by AFC and PAFC for temporary permit.
In the 18th year, such a player can be permitted for a period of four games, but will not be eligible for a permit if they have already played League Football at their SANFL club. The SANFL Club will receive a fee in the sum of $2,500.

Been playing well at U18 level for the Eagles, keeping an eye on him as I reckon he might get a fairly high bid on him at the draft.

Booney wrote:Been playing well at U18 level for the Eagles, keeping an eye on him as I reckon he might get a fairly high bid on him at the draft.

If that’s the case wouldn’t Port be best served long term keeping him ferreted away at 18s level? Plays well with your reserves team he’s got to attract more interest and consequently more points from you come November.

Collingwood have the same problem with Daicos. He’s going to cost them unless they spoon up.

Booney wrote:Been playing well at U18 level for the Eagles, keeping an eye on him as I reckon he might get a fairly high bid on him at the draft.

If he had played one league game for the Eagles he wouldn’t be playing for Port .
Something to think about maybe he should’ve been on the bench for a league match so Port couldn’t get him for four games

MJP1993 wrote:

Booney wrote:Been playing well at U18 level for the Eagles, keeping an eye on him as I reckon he might get a fairly high bid on him at the draft.

If he had played one league game for the Eagles he wouldn’t be playing for Port .
Something to think about maybe he should’ve been on the bench for a league match so Port couldn’t get him for four games

I couldn't really see him getting a league game with the Eagles in the next four weeks so not overly concerned and I do understand to an extent why the Eagles let him do it (if they had a say in the matter) 1. The eagles seem like they get money out of it 2. Burgoyne gets league experience which would likely mean he will be better player at this level when he does become available for the eagles again 3. We just played Port so no risk he plays against his current SANFL club.

However the thing that annoys me is that once again this impacts the integrity of the competition.

Mr Fuller wrote:

MJP1993 wrote:

Booney wrote:Been playing well at U18 level for the Eagles, keeping an eye on him as I reckon he might get a fairly high bid on him at the draft.

If he had played one league game for the Eagles he wouldn’t be playing for Port .
Something to think about maybe he should’ve been on the bench for a league match so Port couldn’t get him for four games

I couldn't really see him getting a league game with the Eagles in the next four weeks so not overly concerned and I do understand to an extent why the Eagles let him do it (if they had a say in the matter) 1. The eagles seem like they get money out of it 2. Burgoyne gets league experience which would likely mean he will be better player at this level when he does become available for the eagles again 3. We just played Port so no risk he plays against his current SANFL club.

However the thing that annoys me is that once again this impacts the integrity of the competition.

I wonder what other secret squirrel deals the SANFL has with the AFL. Comp integrity not an issue apparently.

am Bays wrote:

Booney wrote:Been playing well at U18 level for the Eagles, keeping an eye on him as I reckon he might get a fairly high bid on him at the draft.

If that’s the case wouldn’t Port be best served long term keeping him ferreted away at 18s level? Plays well with your reserves team he’s got to attract more interest and consequently more points from you come November.

Collingwood have the same problem with Daicos. He’s going to cost them unless they spoon up.

Daicos will cost them heaps regardless of ladder position

am Bays wrote:

Booney wrote:Been playing well at U18 level for the Eagles, keeping an eye on him as I reckon he might get a fairly high bid on him at the draft.

If that’s the case wouldn’t Port be best served long term keeping him ferreted away at 18s level? Plays well with your reserves team he’s got to attract more interest and consequently more points from you come November.

Collingwood have the same problem with Daicos. He’s going to cost them unless they spoon up.

True, no scouts watch the SANFL 18s...