by on the rails » Wed Feb 03, 2016 8:39 am
by Dogwatcher » Wed Feb 03, 2016 8:51 am
JK wrote: Norwood would be up there (if not ahead of all) in Football Department spending I would think .. Knew a loss was coming, and don't think it's an issue going forward - Although the spend on the Membership facility still scares me.
by JK » Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:00 am
Dogwatcher wrote:JK wrote: Norwood would be up there (if not ahead of all) in Football Department spending I would think .. Knew a loss was coming, and don't think it's an issue going forward - Although the spend on the Membership facility still scares me.
I understand they've cut/lost at least one senior member of the football department for this season.
So there's at least some cutback in spending. Is that correct?
by wedgetail » Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:19 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Sat Feb 06, 2016 9:34 pm
by VALE PARK » Sun Feb 07, 2016 11:25 am
by Bounce of the ball » Mon Feb 08, 2016 8:54 pm
by Dogwatcher » Tue Feb 16, 2016 11:37 am
by UK Fan » Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:09 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Not strictly financial projections, but good news for a club is set to be announced tomorrow.
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Magellan » Tue Feb 16, 2016 12:40 pm
UK Fan wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Not strictly financial projections, but good news for a club is set to be announced tomorrow.
Which is ????
by Hazydog » Tue Feb 16, 2016 2:02 pm
Dogwatcher wrote:Not strictly financial projections, but good news for a club is set to be announced tomorrow.
by UK Fan » Tue Feb 16, 2016 3:13 pm
Hazydog wrote:Dogwatcher wrote:Not strictly financial projections, but good news for a club is set to be announced tomorrow.
Probably completely unrelated but I found myself wondering whether Holden have committed as major sponsor for this season yet?
fester69 wrote: I'm full of "pish and wind" !!You can call me weak !!
MW wrote: Well call me a special asshole!.
Booney wrote: I'm a happy clapper **** stick.
by Grahaml » Tue Feb 16, 2016 4:44 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:I'm not sure what womans football has to with investing money for the survival, benefit and growth of the SANFL competition.
We must have someone with some financial nous within the clubs pushing for a shared income distribution , let alone at SANFL level. If the clubs and SANFL are that dumb then , yes, our competition is stuffed. This is basic fundamental management stuff.
by Bounce of the ball » Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:19 pm
by VALE PARK » Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:34 pm
by Magellan » Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:42 pm
by VALE PARK » Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:51 pm
by Bounce of the ball » Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:53 pm
VALE PARK wrote:I think he is saying.
The SANFL with their clubs will fund the Women's comp etc.
So the SANFL financial projections must include these costs going forward
unless the AFL come up with the funding.
Like the men players currently,
women players will be taken into the new National women comp in drafts in years to come.
by Magellan » Tue Feb 16, 2016 5:57 pm
Bounce of the ball wrote:VALE PARK wrote:I think he is saying.
The SANFL with their clubs will fund the Women's comp etc.
So the SANFL financial projections must include these costs going forward
unless the AFL come up with the funding.
Like the men players currently,
women players will be taken into the new National women comp in drafts in years to come.
Not sure what it has to do with the SANFL.
Competitions SANFL Official Site | Country Footy SA | Southern Football League | VFL Footy
Club Forums Snouts Louts | The Roost | Redlegs Forum |