Page 1 of 2

Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 5:41 pm
by Big Phil
FULL TIME @ ENVESTRA PARK

LEAGUE - Final Scores

Port - 12.11 = 83

Sturt - 8.15 = 63

Magpies win by 20 points



GOAL KICKERS:

Port - R.Young 4, M.Shaw 3, J.Neade 2, B.Newton, A.Young, H.Slattery 1

Sturt - M.Coad 3, M.Duldig 2, Z.Kirkwood, B.Hansen, A.Kurtze 1

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 5:42 pm
by pipers
Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 5:58 pm
by Macca19
Beard was ordinary. Kirkwood, Greenslade, Harms, Coad were Sturts best.

Young, Shaw, AhChee, Clurey, DBJ best for Port.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 6:10 pm
by LPH
Appeared on TV that the superior fitness of Port Reserves told in the end.
Sturt were very competitive.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 7:06 pm
by SANFLnut
Appeared on TV that Port were on the good end of the worst 10 umpiring decisions of the day. Thought they were very stiff from that point of view.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sat Jun 28, 2014 7:17 pm
by CUTTERMAN
The holding the ball interpretation was disgraceful today. Port were caught infront of goal in the 3rd in what was the most obvious decision that could be made but nothing, yet they pay the most ridiculous.
In the end we should've kicked the goals we missed, had our chances and blew it.
For a franchise that has 50k members they aren't very passionate when it comes to going to the game. Pi$$weak.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:06 am
by matt35
In the end just a case of Port taking their chances when it counted. Really wasn't much in that game all day! Good hard game of Football and both sides should be there deep in to the finals.

What was the crowd there today?

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:17 am
by CUTTERMAN
About 2000 at a guess

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 1:21 am
by topsywaldron
pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?


The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.

You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 2:08 am
by on the rails
SANFLnut wrote:Appeared on TV that Port were on the good end of the worst 10 umpiring decisions of the day. Thought they were very stiff from that point of view.


I agree - Sturt were screwed by the appalling AFL bias the umpires in the SANFL are showing. The performance of the maggots today was as bad as their effort last week re the Cows bias vs. the chooks.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:18 am
by Macca19
topsywaldron wrote:
pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?


The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.

You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?


You're right. That's why 3/4 of this forum is whinging about Port Adelaide on a weekly basis.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:28 am
by CUTTERMAN
Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:31 am
by Rik E Boy
Macca19 wrote:
topsywaldron wrote:
pipers wrote:Who were Sturt's best?

Kirkwood and Beard?

Again?


The death of your football team not stopping you asking pointless questions then.

You know nobody cares about the Maggies anymore don't you?


You're right. That's why 3/4 of this forum is whinging about Port Adelaide on a weekly basis.


Yes but that is whinging about the Power isn't it though.

Regards,

REB

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:39 am
by southee
Watched this game a TV and must say the umpiring was a disgrace against Sturt.
Some absolutely baffling decisions with hints of AFL influence coming through ....

A big worry of things to come IMO ....:(

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 10:47 am
by RB
Just you wait till we get 50m pens, substitutes, and Viney-style 3 week suspensions for nothing.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 11:47 am
by MightyEagles
RB wrote:Just you wait till we get 50m pens, substitutes, and Viney-style 3 week suspensions for nothing.


Don't say that, someone from HQ will read this and decide that that is a good idea. SSSSSHH

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:46 pm
by CUTTERMAN
Chris MattDermot

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 12:53 pm
by maxyoz
matt35 wrote:At Macca; Not worth responding to people like topsy who are on a sulk that's now reached nearly 12 months! Oh and I see the umpires are now in on the great AFL conspiracy! Who next?


No Umps in the SANFL

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:08 pm
by Booney
CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.


Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.

Re: Rnd 12 - Sturt v Port - POST GAME Discussion

PostPosted: Sun Jun 29, 2014 4:21 pm
by kickinit
Booney wrote:
CUTTERMAN wrote:Beard, Kirkwood and Watt walked out of the Magpies due to them being turned into a reserves team. They walked out due to the decisions that the PAFC board made that went 100% against what was promised only 2-3 years previous.
If Wingard or Monfries are in The Pimps best are you going to validate that by suggesting they are Sturt players?
I doubt it. You're a flog.


Clubs that voted yes.

Yours.

E.A.D.


Booney how dare you say anything bad about the clubs that voted yes. Didn't you know that it is all PAFC fault. :lol: