SA Footy

And yet North voted Yes to the Crows??
Im guessing similar happened at most other SANFL clubs at the time.

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:And yet North voted Yes to the Crows??
Im guessing similar happened at most other SANFL clubs at the time.

The carrot of a free $50,000.....they forgot to factor in a members revolt would cancel that out

heater31 wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:And yet North voted Yes to the Crows??
Im guessing similar happened at most other SANFL clubs at the time.

The carrot of a free $50,000.....they forgot to factor in a members revolt would cancel that out

But theres 4,000 going to the games when they host the Crows so clubs are swimming in the money from bbq and beers.....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

heater31 wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:And yet North voted Yes to the Crows??
Im guessing similar happened at most other SANFL clubs at the time.

The carrot of a free $50,000.....they forgot to factor in a members revolt would cancel that out

But theres 4,000 going to the games when they host the Crows so clubs are swimming in the money from bbq and beers.....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Not when half the crowd don't turn up cause they've spat the dummy

MW wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:

heater31 wrote:

mighty_tiger_79 wrote:And yet North voted Yes to the Crows??
Im guessing similar happened at most other SANFL clubs at the time.

The carrot of a free $50,000.....they forgot to factor in a members revolt would cancel that out

But theres 4,000 going to the games when they host the Crows so clubs are swimming in the money from bbq and beers.....

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

Not when half the crowd don't turn up cause they've spat the dummy

So why have half the Ravens' fans spat the dummy for?

Sent from my SM-A520F using Tapatalk

ironic you post that in this thread...

Crows reserves and Giant reserves want to have a scratchy next weekend, if only there was a way they could keep match fitness up in the SANFL.

daysofourlives wrote:Crows reserves and Giant reserves want to have a scratchy next weekend, if only there was a way they could keep match fitness up in the SANFL.

Assume the SANFL have sanctioned the game?

daysofourlives wrote:Crows reserves and Giant reserves want to have a scratchy next weekend, if only there was a way they could keep match fitness up in the SANFL.

Just think, if the interlopers had been prohibited from partaking in finals, and the five finals slots given to the five best dinkum teams, then the smears and clowns reserves could have negotiated a trial game for this weekend. Win-win.

Hazydog wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Crows reserves and Giant reserves want to have a scratchy next weekend, if only there was a way they could keep match fitness up in the SANFL.

Assume the SANFL have sanctioned the game?

didn't know SANFL have control over GWS?

MW wrote:

Hazydog wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Crows reserves and Giant reserves want to have a scratchy next weekend, if only there was a way they could keep match fitness up in the SANFL.

Assume the SANFL have sanctioned the game?

didn't know SANFL have control over GWS?

They don't MW - but historically any match outside of the SANFL comp, by an SANFL Team would need approval from the SANFL.

Pedantic I know - but was just interested if it had been covered off.

Very strong Port Power Reserves team on paper for tomorrow. Combined salaries would be worth a bit. Farce. Perhaps it is time for Sturt to suffer a finals drubbing at the hands of the Pros.

Fingers crossed the Dogs can win it, but dont hold great hope.

Hazydog wrote:They don't MW - but historically any match outside of the SANFL comp, by an SANFL Team would need approval from the SANFL.

Where does it say that?

The farce that the sanfl has become due mainly to that crook olsen is coming home to roost now

Good to see Sturt beaten by the Professionals (except for some of their supporters who didn't advocate their inclusion). The Sturt board seems to be one of the strongest advocates of the incursion, I guess they can be they won a flag. Also good to see Norwood out, though Tripodi and Pickard have one team left, with a chance.
Unfortunately I'll always have that "chip on my shoulder" against the boards and the SANFL that have ruined our competition.

^^^ This!

Hazydog wrote:

MW wrote:

Hazydog wrote:

daysofourlives wrote:Crows reserves and Giant reserves want to have a scratchy next weekend, if only there was a way they could keep match fitness up in the SANFL.

Assume the SANFL have sanctioned the game?

didn't know SANFL have control over GWS?

They don't MW - but historically any match outside of the SANFL comp, by an SANFL Team would need approval from the SANFL.

Pedantic I know - but was just interested if it had been covered off.

Will laugh when channel 7 decide to show a reserves scratch match over SANFL finals this week

Reddeer wrote:The farce that the sanfl has become due mainly to that crook olsen is coming home to roost now

Only just now??????

Dogs72 wrote:Good to see Sturt beaten by the Professionals (except for some of their supporters who didn't advocate their inclusion). The Sturt board seems to be one of the strongest advocates of the incursion, I guess they can be they won a flag. Also good to see Norwood out, though Tripodi and Pickard have one team left, with a chance.
Unfortunately I'll always have that "chip on my shoulder" against the boards and the SANFL that have ruined our competition.

'If we vote to let the AFL reserves teams in, the SANFL will be reduced to the status of parklands footy within five years'
Joe Tripodi 26th June 2013.

Keith Thomas "we promise to always play to the line"


You are a liar and a disgrace to the SANFL KT.

Who else is surprised they paid lip service to their promise


http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl ... cfb3a1ab12